It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dem Party Platform Calls For Prosecuting Global Warming Skeptics

page: 3
20
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: reldra

There was no twist there.

What when on the church wasn't because of the religion itself.

But the politicization of it by the few.

The few that was responsible for the greatest atrocities in world history.

People SHOULD be paying attention.


This entire line of argument is not logical. You are talking about murders committed by a church in the far, far past and trying to compare it to the possibility the definition of fraud may be expanded in a relationship between companies and shareholders.

I suggest you scale down what you want to compare your complaint to.




posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

That's funny coming the founding member of the church of the NRA.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96

That's funny coming the founding member of the church of the NRA.


That manufactured villain.

Go figure from the same people that manufactured 'global warming'.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

He wasn't jailed for a differing opinion, he was jailed for breaking the law.


Dugdale pointed to a probation report citing eight allegations in which Nakoula had allegedly violated his probation. One of those was a requirement not to use aliases without permission from his probation officer, something the prosecutor said Nakoula did on at least three instances: during his fraud case, when he tried to get a passport in 2011 and during the making of the film. Dugdale said Nakoula had deceived the cast of the film as well as his probation officers.


CNN



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: TheBulk

He wasn't jailed for a differing opinion, he was jailed for breaking the law.


Oh please. Would he have ended up in prison without Obama and Hillary blaming his video for the attack in Benghazi? You shills will find any way to rationalize your tyranny. This is what makes you so dangerous. You'll ALWAYS find a justification.

What was it Obama said, "The future does not belong to those that slander Islam"?
edit on 27-6-2016 by TheBulk because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

I'm a shill now?

LOL



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk
This is a leading question fallacy. You imply the claim that Nakoula's arrest came in part for blaming the video on the attack on Benghazi in a question asking about how important that actually was in arresting him. You first need to prove that those claims had anything to do with his arrest before you can ask people to define how important it had to do with his arrest.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

silenced in the media.

And restricted, blocked, or banned from the Internet.

Not all censorship is transparent.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: TheBulk

I'm a shill now?

LOL


I won't go so far as to say you are.

But the DNC is definitely is.

Getting paid for their POLITICAL BELIEFS.
edit on 27-6-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: TheBulk

I'm a shill now?

LOL


I won't go so far as to say you are.

But the DNC is definitely is.

Getting paid for their POLITICAL BELIEFS.


What is the RNC then? A charity?



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TheBulk
This is a leading question fallacy. You imply the claim that Nakoula's arrest came in part for blaming the video on the attack on Benghazi in a question asking about how important that actually was in arresting him. You first need to prove that those claims had anything to do with his arrest before you can ask people to define how important it had to do with his arrest.


Yes it was a total coincidence that he got arrested right after Hillary and Obama LIED and blamed him for the attack. Sheesh, you guys are some deluded fools. You seem eager to display willful ignorance.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:25 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:26 PM
link   
Back to the OP, no one will be prosecuted for being a 'global warming sceptic'. No one has called for that. Until you can prove that, which you have not, since there are no facts to back that up, it is an failed thread.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Au contraire.



Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has some, but not all, of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] For example, corporations have the right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons.


Corporate Personhood.




no one will be prosecuted for being a 'global warming sceptic


FALSE.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Being a GW skeptic is not the same as being a corporation that intentionally misleads their shareholders in contrast to verifiable scientific information.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: neo96

Being a GW skeptic is not the same as being a corporation that intentionally misleads their shareholders in contrast to verifiable scientific information.


Interesting coming from 'CLinton is innocent until proven guilty', and 'corporations are just guilty'. Because Dems say so.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: neo96

Being a GW skeptic is not the same as being a corporation that intentionally misleads their shareholders in contrast to verifiable scientific information.


Interesting coming from 'CLinton is innocent until proven guilty', and 'corporations are just guilty'. Because Dems say so.



Which corporations have been found guilty? This is all speculation as far as I am concerned.

Stop playing the victim card. There is no reason to do so.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:47 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




Another joint proposal calling on the Department of Justice to investigate alleged corporate fraud on the part of fossil fuel companies who have reportedly misled shareholders and the public on the scientific reality of climate change was also adopted by unanimous consent,”


What THAT is ALL hydro chloro Bull Snip as far as I am concerned.

Same AGENDA that's been playing out for the last 8 years.

How about the Dems stop playing the 'victims' for ONCE.

That is when they are NOT taking money from big oil.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

You're not making much sense.



posted on Jun, 27 2016 @ 03:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join