Clinton pardoned to become President

a reply to: neo96

Uh, google Bush Cocaine......enough said!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
She won't need a pardon. She didn't do anything illegal. Sorry reps but you all know this and just can't seem to swallow it.

All I can say is wow. The ignorance blinders is strong with this one.

Care to explain the indictment then? On second thought, never mind. The spin is too strong with you. Good luck come November. Let's all be a part of history and vote the first female president!! Horray!!! First a black pres, now a female!!! I'm so proud to be an American!!!

a reply to: rollanotherone

Care to explain the indictment then?

Wait. What?
Clinton was indicted? Awesome! This is big.

Um... I can't find anything about it. Can you help?

Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton TO BE INDICTED – Breaking News!

Read more: www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

a reply to: awareness10

Oh.
So, the answer is there has been no indictment. But the good news is that there is a blog post about a blog post that someone wrote but has been deleted.

awesome.

Yup. Leave it up to the usual suspects to proclaim "I helped elect the first female president".

My prediction is that the entire corrupted Washington establishment would have to be removed to ensure this country's very existence. 2nd line.

a reply to: TDawg61
Existence.
For how long?
2 weeks? 2 centuries?

Nothing lasts forever.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: awareness10

Oh.
So, the answer is there has been no indictment. But the good news is that there is a blog post about a blog post that someone wrote but has been deleted.

awesome.

I just love the way you talk sometimes Phage, do you always answer people in riddles rhymes and rhetorics?

Do you want me to say sorry would that make you feel all fuzzy and warm?

a reply to: awareness10

I just love the way you talk sometimes Phage, do you always answer people in riddles rhymes and rhetorics?

I try.
To get people to think about what they say. And think.

Sometimes it works. Most of the time, not so much.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TDawg61
Existence.
For how long?
2 weeks? 2 centuries?

Nothing lasts forever.

Well Phage, I dont see my observation requiring a finite timeline.What can be answered, and all ATS needs to know..Do yourself and Donald Trump use the same hair dresser?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: awareness10

I just love the way you talk sometimes Phage, do you always answer people in riddles rhymes and rhetorics?

I try.
To get people to think about what they say. And think.

Sometimes it works. Most of the time, not so much.

You can 'think' too you know, really, you don't have to police others' views to match your own.

a reply to: TDawg61
I don't have a hairdresser. I get to Supercuts once a year. Twice if there's a special occasion.

Really good attempt at...something, though.

a reply to: awareness10

You can 'think' too you know, really, you don't have to police others' views to match your own.

Police?
No, you can think what you wish. For all the good it does anyone.
You can believe any rumor you wish. For all the good it does you.

Back to topic.What would the world think if such a scenario were to take place? Any moral credibility this nation had would be lost., IMO

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TDawg61
I don't have a hairdresser. I get to Supercuts once a year. Twice if there's a special occasion.

Really good attempt at...something, though.

Its called a jest Phage.Try Wikipedia. ..

a reply to: TDawg61
All I get is this. It doesn't seem relevant.
en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Phage

That was a short post representing absolutely nothing about absolutely nothing.

To get people to think about what they say. And think.

Sometimes it works. Most of the time, not so much.

What exactly are you trying to get people to think Phage?

I'm curious now.

a reply to: awareness10

What exactly are you trying to get people to think Phage?

It's not so much about what they think, but why they think it.
www.criticalthinking.org...

Basing what you think on blogs probably is not an indication of critical thought.