This is sort of a question, and I could be way off base here, but if I'm NOT way off base, I'm surprised I haven't seen this mentioned in the other
"Was the HoR sit-in felonious?"
As of February 29, 2012,
3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, obstructs or impedes
ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds;
(c)In this section—
(1)the term restricted buildings or grounds means any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area—
(B)of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting;
I saw that Bernie made an appearance, so Secret Service was there, no?
(c) Violation of this section, and attempts or conspiracies to commit such violations, shall be prosecuted by the United States attorney in the
Federal district court having jurisdiction of the place where the offense occurred.
So... Seems like it falls under the conditions, doesn't it?
(I only thought of this because of that list of 26 participants who are "legal" gun owners...) If the sit-in WAS felonious, aren't they automatically
forfeiting their gun-ownership rights?
(Caveats: I am pretty much pro individual rights, especially 2nd amendment, and I don't like the "assaults" on our rights, so... If anyone wants to
redo this post, and it's references, better, do it. I wouldn't mind.)
(It's getting late, I dunno how long I'll be up... I also don't know how much more info I can contribute...)
I look forward to what "both sides" have about this, so go for it...
edit on 6/25/2016 by japhrimu because: Added
stuff... Don't know if I made it any better...