It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: TechniXcality
Krazysh0t! An enemy combatant has no such rights!
Of course they do. Every human has the same basic rights.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: neo96
I'm actually curious. Which eleven rights do you think gun control violates and why?
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You mean like the due process the left wants to rob from gun owners with no fly no buy?
Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump is reaffirming his stance on potentially restricting individuals on the terror watch list from being able to purchase firearms, a week after the worst mass shooting in U.S. history. “We have to make sure that people that are terrorists or have even an inclination toward terrorism cannot buy weapons, guns,” Trump told ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl in an interview to air Sunday on “This Week.” Asked by Karl if his position is that those on the no-fly or terror watch list should not be able to purchase a gun, Trump responded, “I’d like to see that, and I’d like to say it. And it’s simpler. It’s just simpler.”
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: VivreLibre
Why should they not be allowed to investigate someone just because they are Muslim? Are they being stopped from investigating Christians, blacks, Russians? If there is an Australian terrorist, it's OK to investigate but not if they are Muslim?
Muslim isn't a nationality it is a religion. And how the government treats religions is VERY thoroughly covered in the First Amendment. How about going back and rereading it?
originally posted by: VivreLibre
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: VivreLibre
Why should they not be allowed to investigate someone just because they are Muslim? Are they being stopped from investigating Christians, blacks, Russians? If there is an Australian terrorist, it's OK to investigate but not if they are Muslim?
Muslim isn't a nationality it is a religion. And how the government treats religions is VERY thoroughly covered in the First Amendment. How about going back and rereading it?
So just belonging to a religion exempts one from being investigated by law enforcement?
Cool opinion
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
I'm a liar now? What is my motive? I have to prove my point but shredderofsouls gets a pass? I think we all know why...
Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Amendment XIV Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
We need strong leadership who enforces the law not stops it from being enforced. Obama is a moron. Some of you just don't accept the truth, even if it came up to you and smacked you right in the jaw knocking your teeth out.
originally posted by: shredderofsouls
What I don't understand is that the majority of mass shootings have been perpetrated by right wing white males but you never ask for them to be profiled and nor should they.
Why is one wrong and the other right?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
I'm a liar now? What is my motive? I have to prove my point but shredderofsouls gets a pass? I think we all know why...
I didn't see that person's posts and didn't respond to them. I saw your post, which you still refuse to back up with sources (someone else has since proven you wrong with links though). So yes you are a liar. That's what I call all the people who make claims calling them facts without posting evidence. I don't give a # how lazy you are with sourcing, if you refuse to back it up, I don't believe it and call you a liar. Tough # for you huh?
originally posted by: Arizonaguy
Blacks, Asians,and Native Americans are statistically more likely to commit a mass shooting
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: VivreLibre
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: VivreLibre
Why should they not be allowed to investigate someone just because they are Muslim? Are they being stopped from investigating Christians, blacks, Russians? If there is an Australian terrorist, it's OK to investigate but not if they are Muslim?
Muslim isn't a nationality it is a religion. And how the government treats religions is VERY thoroughly covered in the First Amendment. How about going back and rereading it?
So just belonging to a religion exempts one from being investigated by law enforcement?
Cool opinion
No. Where did you get that? Being in a religion exempts you for being investigated BECAUSE you are in that religion. Nice try with the strawman though. But here try this. If we can investigate muslims for terrorism, just because, then we can investigate Christians for terrorism, just because too.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Krazysh0t
They aren't investigating every mosque because theyre Muslim they are following the cookie crumbs back to specific mosques and being told they can't investigate because they are Muslim.
Get with it and stop trying to push you crap ideology.