It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AP: Clinton State Dept. Calendar Hides 75 Meetings With Donors
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IAMTAT
Yup. Interesting too,...and with that in mind, her meetings with Sid Blumenthal were not recorded either. Sid was 'Persona non grata' to Obama regarding State Dept. business. Wonder if Hillary didn't want the BOSS to know she was secretly meeting with Blumenthal while SOS.
It was/is pretty well known that Blumenthal worked for the Clinton Foundation.
Yes it was/is.
...And we also NOW know (thanks to the Benghazi investigation) he was actively involved in exchanging off-the-books intelligence reports emails to her in her capacity as SoS.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: introvert
I think the more pertinent question is why is there anything other than State Department business on her calendar at a time when she should have been doing nothing else?
Talk about conflict of interest and actual impropriety, nevermind the appearance of!
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT
Interesting thing about the Hillary presidential run.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says you can't elect an evil authoritarian dictator as president.
Our republic is ours to give away.
Fat and ugly too.
That's not nice to say about someone with cankles like a troll, a wrinkled face that looks like an old catcher's mitt, and wears size 14 polyester pant suits from Lane Bryant.
Yep.
She actually is someone's grandma.... the poor kid.
OHHHHH and they might say size 14.... but I don't think there is any chance of squeezing that ass into an actual size 14.
You guys, or girls, have a lot of growing up to do.
That's rich coming from someone who always uses the phrase 'circle jerk'. Until you said it, I think I last heard it on the sixth grade playground.
originally posted by: butcherguy
The Clinton Foundation Intelligence Branch... dealing with subjects that are deemed Classified by the US Government.
Kind of redefines what a 'non-profit organization' is all about.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: introvert
but could be considered classified if the government got their hands on it.
Could it be considered classified if the info came from the Secretary of State of the United States..... and also is a member of the Foundation?
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: introvert
I haven't seen everything that was on the CF server.
Maybe the FBI will release some of that stuff so we will know more about it.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: introvert
I haven't seen everything that was on the CF server.
Maybe the FBI will release some of that stuff so we will know more about it.
Many of the emails are already available. The Blumenthal emails that have been released directly reference work the CF is doing in other nations, and was not part of the SD.
One of the criteria for something to be deemed classified is that it has the material has to be "owned by, produced by or for, or is under the control of the United States Government"
Determining whether information is under governmental control requires that three major questions be answered. First, is the information subject to governmental control when that information is within the United States? Does the government have the power to control the information, either through governmental ownership, contractual relations, or by a statute? If the government cannot control information that is under consideration for classification, then it is generally futile to classify that information. Second, do the government's adversaries already have the information? Protecting information already known to adversaries is a wasted effort.* Third, can the government's adversaries readily obtain the information by their own, independent, nonespionage efforts? If adversaries can easily obtain the information, then it is usually not cost effective to classify it. Considerations in determining the answers to these three major questions are described in the following subsections of this chapter.
Thank you for proving things not owned by or produced by or for the United States Government but subject to the statues of (which is what brings the item in question under the control of) the United States Government can be classified.
Anything subject to the statutes of the United States Government can indeed be classified.