It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: shredderofsouls
Why do guns owners act like the 2nd amendment is set in stone? It has the word amendment, which means the fore fathers thought that at some point it and other amendments may need to be changed with the times.
Why do journalists act like the First Amendment is set in stone?
originally posted by: Kali74
Were the framers Fascists?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: burdman30ott6
It's not. Look I think it's far too late to implement but the words well regulated do mean something. Were the framers Fascists?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: AmericanRealist
What would he treason be?
Protesting what their constituates want?
Maybe we should do a better job as gun owners not selfishly worrying about our rights but explaining to the left this is a distraction issue. That gun violence in its massive numbers in the us are related to drugs, poverty, and organized crime. That the poor won't be effected by this type of legislation and it's possibly extremely classist and racist to not address the issues of violence in parts of big cities but focus on guns.
That mental health issues will still slip through the cracks and the people that may even require assisted living have no where to go.
That we haven't stopped the flow of people who can slip over the boarder (where guns easily come with these folks).
And all the other actual problems creating gun violence. .
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: neo96
So you don't think the amendments can be changed through a vote?
You don't think people can protest the co rotation or laws?
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: burdman30ott6
It's not. Look I think it's far too late to implement but the words well regulated do mean something. Were the framers Fascists?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: butcherguy
Sure but there is a process.
And honestly if the 2/3 of the public feels like controlling guns there just isn't really a valid fight against stopping that.
However I don't think people have been zombified that badly yet.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: neo96
Thats not true. You can use the amendment process to change specific functions of the bill of rights. You can make amendments that supersede prior ones .