It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dems stage sit-in on House floor to push for gun vote

page: 19
62
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:27 AM
link   
Just Throwing this Out there!!!!

MEME WARS! ??? Anyone









posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: neo96

Let them sit there until they rot.


Let them?

How about chaining them to the floor! LOL.

What a sorry pile of human garbage!


SM2

posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Wolfenz

let me just add this to yor post of memes, just in case people for got, it is in relation to the meme on the bottom.....


According to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, back in 1995, when Eric Holder was Deputy Attorney General under then-President Bill Clinton, Holder authorized members of the FBI to provide explosives to Oklahoma City bombing criminals Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols immediately prior to the April, 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building. This was ostensibly in conjunction with a Clinton Administration undercover operation named PATCON, an acronym for “Patriot Conspiracy.”

Read more at instigatornews.com...



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:37 AM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

From the closed thread:

a reply to: lostbook

One question:

How many of them had their thumbs in their mouths?

Wellll another question or 2 or 3 or . . .

How many of them had a pouty face?

How many of them were whining?

How many of them were obviously wearing their "Depends?"

How many were proudly wearing their lobotomy certificates?

How many were proudly wearing their

TRAITORS TO THE REPUBLIC IN BEHALF OF TYRANNICAL GLOBALISM certificates?

How many of them paused in pandering to the media enough to stay hydrated?

How many of them arrived at the sit-in with armed guards in front of and behind them?

How many of them OBVIOUSLY consider us 'little people' to be merely Eloi fodder for the Morlach's tables?



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Natas0114
a reply to: SlapMonkey

You didn't seriously use noble and us government in the same context, on purpose, right?
best laugh I had all week. Thanks!


Glad I could help



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:40 AM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

Another question the media should be asking is....

Q: How many voted to supply weapons to foreign nationals (including scary assault weapons) immediately prior to this sit-in "protest"?



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:41 AM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

Personally I think we should roll up some white field trip busses and let everyone in Congress get on and go visit the prisons they created for 4-12 years depending on how badly they served their constituates.

Thats my bipartisan solution.
edit on 23-6-2016 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:44 AM
link   
And for the Past ...

of what Liberals were Once Were
and what they stood for



( The Thought Police are Running in my Head ohh Nooo!!! )



Truth to this Meme





edit on 42016ThursdayfAmerica/Chicago6174 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:47 AM
link   
This Nation Is becoming a Police Nation





We are Becoming more and more of the Reality
of a George Orwell Vision of 1984 / Animal Farm
and a Aldous Huxley Scenery of a Brave New World.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr


This is exactly why I really can't stand either party. Democrats wanna disarm us while republicans arm the enemy.


What world is this?



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Wolfenz

It's disgusting The only classical liberals left are treated as wing nuts in the media.

Meanwhile conservatives spend money and in act moral and religious legislation and liberals want to control how people think and divide us into little groups. You get gay rights, Latino rights, black rights, white rights all based on your heritage and struggles. When in reality these are all human rights. We all get rights based on being born. Not who are grandparents were. The problem is people don't like to admit they have treated people inhumanely and acknowledge that find appropriate reperations for injustice and monitor how well the injustice problem is being addressed.

It's easier to stump to special interest groups than try and make us all Americans.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Wolfenz

All that is well and good...but I remember standing up with modern day liberals against the warrant less wiretapping, terror watch lists, and the violation of not just constitutional rights, but governmental procedure outlined in the constitution itself.

Back then the cause of that crap was republican neocons.

Now liberals are screaming to use that very same apparatus to violate due process and strip the second amendment from law abiding citizens.


Quite frankly whatever good liberals did they are working pretty hard to undo it.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:10 AM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn



Quite frankly whatever good liberals did they are working pretty hard to undo it.


I see liberals in this thread and on other social media disagreeing with the Dem Party on gun control and methodologies... blanket statements won't do well to encourage standing together again.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Of Course Commie's don't want Americans to have Guns , it would make it easier to Subvert and Destroy our Country from within that way .



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: intrptr


This is exactly why I really can't stand either party. Democrats wanna disarm us while republicans arm the enemy.


What world is this?


Project ?

Operation Cyclone. Democrat Charlie Wilson that armed the 'mujahideen' that would later form Al Aqaeda.

The current administration arming the muslim brotherhood in Egypt.

Manpads in Libya, arming terrorists in Syria.

And we can't forget about Operation Fast and Furious that armed Mexican Drug cartels.

The only people that push control is the Democrats.

Over 100 FAILED bills since 2011.

That is 20+ per year.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: neo96

Of Course Commie's don't want Americans to have Guns , it would make it easier to Subvert and Destroy our Country from within that way .


You really do live in the 1950s, don't you? LOL "Commies"

We're doing just fine destroying our country from within ... we don't require help.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

burdman your post bears repeating, especially
for school age children who I know are not
being taught a correct comprehension of the
U.S. Constitution purpose & intent.




No, but the US government has undergone a drastic shift in procedural goals since the ratification of the Constitution. The Constitution and Bill of Rights, in principle, defines more restrictions on the government than it does restrictions on the People. When was the last time DC passed anything which restricted or removed power from the federal government and granted power directly to the People?

The definition of fascism is essentially consolidation of power and authority to the highest levels of national government... the complete opposite of the Framer's plan. The 10th Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Federal gun control is in direct violation of the 10th, as nowhere in the Constitution does it provide Congress any authority to do anything related to firearms EXCEPT defense of the 2nd Amendment's sanctity.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

No he doesn't live in the 50s.



Firearms can be used by law enforcement, the military and paramilitary, or security personnel protecting property of state importance (including the arms industry, financial institutions, storage of resources, and scientific research institutions).




Civilian ownership of firearms is largely restricted to non-individual entities such as sporting organisations, hunting reserves, and wildlife protection, management and research organizations. The chief exception to the general ban for individual gun ownership is for the purpose of hunting.[15]


en.wikipedia.org...

2016.



A communist state is a state that is governed by a single party adhering to some variation of Marxism–Leninism as its guiding ideology.[1] The term "Communist state" is used by Western historians, political scientists and media to refer to these countries. However, contrary to Western usage, these states do not describe themselves as "communist" nor do they claim to have achieved communism; they refer to themselves as Socialist states or Workers' states that are in the process of constructing socialism.[2][3][4][5]


en.wikipedia.org...

Here in the west we call them DEMOCRATS.

Bullsnip by any other name smell as sweet ?

Gun control.

And in case someone missed it.

Civilian ownership of firearms is largely restricted to non-individual entities



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:38 AM
link   
Here is another take.

Democrats Tanked Gun Control To Up Their Election Chances



On Monday evening, Senate Democrats put party over principle in rejecting common-sense, reasonable gun control measures. After the mass murder at Orlando gay club Pulse, Sen. Chris Murphy and his colleagues staged a flashy talk-a-thon in which they demanded that votes be taken on legislation strengthening gun control laws. The Senate Republicans agreed to the Democrats’ demand. Democrats got what they asked for, then blew it.


Party FIRST.

Party ONLY.

What is benefit to the PARTY.



posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 10:46 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Dude the Republican presidential candidate is pushing this too

You completely side step this.

How about Iran contra? What about the patriot act? Homeland security, TSA? George Bush is almost up there with fdr with expanding gov and executive orders.

How about rebublicans trying to write religeous moral laws? Drowning in government contracts for donors?

Creating a fiat money system? Opening up uneven trade tariffs to China?

No my friend we are taking it from both sides.
edit on 23-6-2016 by luthier because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
62
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join