It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The first successful tests were carried out in 1962 when a team from theMassachusetts Institute of Technologysucceeded in observing laser pulses reflected from moon's surface using a laser with a millisecond pulse length.[2]Similar measurements were obtained later the same year by a Soviet team at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatoryusing a Q-switched ruby laser.[3] Greater accuracy was achieved following the installation of a retroreflector array on July 21, 1969, by the crew of Apollo 11, and two more retroreflector arrays left by the Apollo 14 and Apollo 15 missions have also contributed to the experiment. Successful lunar laser range measurements to the retroreflectors were first reported by the 3.1 m telescope at Lick Observatory, Air Force Cambridge Research LaboratoriesLunar Ranging Observatory in Arizona, the Pic du Midi Observatory in France, the Tokyo Astronomical Observatory, and McDonald Observatory in Texas.
Can I go there n see it?
Also science isn't fact. It's whatever tptb or big corps want us to believe it is.
It was a scientific fact 60yrs ago that smoking was healthy.
YouTube : flat earth Fake Apollo Fake iss Etc etc. It's been scientifically proven Btw science is just a religion it's not based on facts. A good deal of it is all fake.
originally posted by: lavatrance
a reply to: lavatrance
Its a 50/50 as to which is more real flat earth or round n space.
I think maybe round with no space
That or it's flat n they just haven't fully explained the distance between locations issue. Which is very plausible.
You mean the things that have been proven real a million times?
originally posted by: lavatrance
a reply to: TerryDon79
It doesn't work like that. If I create a sheraid, on someone elses dime, I have to eventually prove that what I'm doing is real. The ISS and moon landings etc etc, are that sheraid.
You say it's CGI. Prove it's fake and CGI. Otherwise you're just talking rubbish.
When are they going to prove it's real. CGI DOESNT PROVE IT'S REAL. What floors me is that people think that's evidence enough.
I don't care if it proves it to you or not. Just because you don't accept something, doesn't mean it's not real.
Do you get this??? Like I could create all that CGI on my home computer and I tell you that I have a space station too. See look I have the photos and video. See that proves it right?? No way. They haven't proved jake as far as I'm concerned.
You mean like you can now? Yep, that's right. You can buy a trip into space.
But really when I think about it, in the grand scheme of things, none of it really matters, simply because we'll never be shown any clear proof anyway. And until we do, until we can buy tickets for space tourism then it's a waste even talking about it.
originally posted by: lavatrance
a reply to: eriktheawful
a model rocket. okay 10 dollars at the hobby store
2) a fish eye lense. And how do we know they're in space? explain?
If I create a sheraid, on someone elses dime, I have to eventually prove that what I'm doing is real. The ISS and moon landings etc etc, are that sheraid.
Are the oceans deep? Has anyone even been there?
How could anyone prove the oceans are deep?