It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

And today children, we're at DefCon 3....

page: 3
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You are one of the brightest if not the brightest fellow on this site but that comment I dont agree with
edit on 21-6-2016 by khnum because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 12:05 AM
link   
a reply to: khnum

Fair enough. It was an opinion, after all.

But tell me, has Russia announced such maneuvers? How long ago?



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 12:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: khnum
I wonder how the Pentagon would respond to a 24 country coalition of 31000 troops,thousands of vehicles,105 airplanes and 12 warships conducting an excersise just south of San Diego?


Well, the only country capable of doing that exercise there would be the USA and its allies, why would they worry about it?



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 12:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: BestinShow

originally posted by: caterpillage

originally posted by: BestinShow
a reply to: Phage


Yep...

www.snopes.com...



Whew! thanks! its nothing everybody go back to watching the kardashians.


Who are the kardashians..?



They were one of the lumpy faced aliens on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.




posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 12:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

On June 1st the Russian defense minister announced there will be about 2000 drills and exersizes during the summer months including 'dozens' of large scale exersises,there were recent readiness exersises so yes they are training also



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 12:15 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

No. You're confused. They were the ones with the sexy spots on their necks.



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 12:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: chr0naut

No. You're confused. They were the ones with the sexy spots on their necks.


I thought the sexy spots ones had worms or something and were gender confused?

But they weren't the only ones, the sexy b1t# one had the hots for the guy with big earrings an a dress (one of them on-and-off affairs).


edit on 21/6/2016 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 02:37 AM
link   
This thread belong in the Hoax bin
www.defconlevel.com...



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 05:06 AM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

The site itself admits it is a farce not connected to the US government in any way...don't really need anyone else to verify it is BS.



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 05:15 AM
link   
a reply to: nullafides

No if you post obvious bs as though it is actually the truth...that makes you the fool.

With just a little bit of research and the truth became known...something that the should have been done before the OP was written...

Having an open mind is great...but that doesn't give you carte blanche to push obvious crap and complain when it gets debunked.

Remember this and it will help you to balance the crap from the truth...

Deny Ignorance.



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 05:23 AM
link   
a reply to: khnum

And have been since they invaded Ukraine...with way more troops than any NATO exercise that has happened in the last few years combined.

www.rt.com...

europe.newsweek.com...

But hey that is okay, but when less than 5000 NATO troops train there is a problem...do you not understand the hypocrisy of what Russia says and does?
edit on 21-6-2016 by tsurfer2000h because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Relax, the site is simply giving analysis in regards to it's mission...it's not tied into the WOPR!



I don't think we'll be getting the DEFCON 2 & 1 notices, so this is as good as it gets.


(post by nullafides removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: nullafides

In general....

The response I've gotten to this has been so overtly negative, it is utterly amazing. I did not say that the website I provided was the hands down authority on this issue.

I merely asked, Why?

The culture here is so fragile in it's rabid quest for intellectualism, and "truth". It draws a blind eye to all but what it sees as "truth", which is no better than those who suckle at the teat of MSM pablum.

The vast majority of you here are so pathetically dogmatic in your thought processes and approach, it is summed up in one single word.


SAD.



posted on Jun, 21 2016 @ 06:34 PM
link   
How are members here to know what some guy running that site thinks and his reason? I wouldn't put it past him to change it just to get hits.

You could ask him why.
edit on 6/21/2016 by roadgravel because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join