It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
I have never understood the ban on growing food any place that has soil for it.
originally posted by: AMPTAH
originally posted by: Annee
I have never understood the ban on growing food any place that has soil for it.
Because in the old days, the "tax" you paid was a portion of your harvest.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: AMPTAH
originally posted by: Annee
I have never understood the ban on growing food any place that has soil for it.
Because in the old days, the "tax" you paid was a portion of your harvest.
Not buying that.
No one cares about why something was tax in the past.
Its about property values.
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: AMPTAH
originally posted by: Annee
I have never understood the ban on growing food any place that has soil for it.
Because in the old days, the "tax" you paid was a portion of your harvest.
Not buying that.
No one cares about why something was tax in the past.
Its about property values.
And guess what? Higher property values mean higher property taxes! Yea! Woohoo!
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Annee
I suppose it depends but it's generally quite regressive. The longer you own your property and the more it appreciates the more you pay. In places where values appreciate this means that you're going to be paying more and more, no matter what your income does.
If you inherit property but don't make a lot of money, you're screwed unless you sell it.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: AMPTAH
if all that was true, then no one would have any garden anywhere..