It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order preventing Seattle City Light from disclosing the location of FBI cameras and other surveillance equipment hidden on some of the city’s utility poles. U.S. District Judge Richard Jones said in a written order Monday that he reviewed classified material before issuing the order, finding that the bureau could be “irreparably injured” if the information is released. Turning over the information could damage national security or “harm important federal law enforcement operational interests as well as the personal privacy of innocent third parties.”
Federal prosecutors filed a complaint Monday in U.S. District Court asking that City Light be barred from turning over the information in response to a state public- disclosure request filed by Phil Mocek, a founding member of the Center for Open Policing, which has sued a number of public agencies over access to information. Jones said the temporary restraining order would remain in effect until further order.
The city, after strenuous objections to the release of any information by the FBI, agreed to redact the location of the cameras. That’s the information that Mocek was seeking — and that the city intended to release — before Jones issued the temporary restraining order. In its complaint, the FBI says the city’s decision to release any information has badly damaged the relationship with the bureau, and the FBI says it is no longer telling City Light when or where it might be installing surveillance equipment, which the complaint says is routinely disguised so it won’t be recognized by passers-by or the subject of the investigation. Every camera, the government said, is tied to a specific investigation.
A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order preventing Seattle City Light from disclosing the location of FBI cameras and other surveillance equipment hidden on some of the city’s utility poles.
The FBI is not the only federal law- enforcement agency using city utility poles as a base for surveillance. The issue came to light last August when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives acknowledged it has installed cameras as part of an investigation in the Central District.
originally posted by: corblimeyguvnor
a reply to: seattlerat
Panopticon
2nd line
The Panopticon is a type of institutional building designed by the English philosopher and social theorist Jeremy Bentham in the late 18th century. The concept of the design is to allow all (pan-) inmates of an institution to be observed (-opticon) by a single watchman without the inmates being able to tell whether or not they are being watched. Although it is physically impossible for the single watchman to observe all cells at once, the fact that the inmates cannot know when they are being watched means that all inmates must act as though they are watched at all times, effectively controlling their own behaviour constantly. The name is also a reference to Panoptes from Greek mythology; he was a giant with a hundred eyes and thus was known to be a very effective watchman.
originally posted by: imitator
They are watching you buy guns and shooting them too!
The FBI is not the only federal law- enforcement agency using city utility poles as a base for surveillance. The issue came to light last August when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives acknowledged it has installed cameras as part of an investigation in the Central District.
originally posted by: ANNED
I would be thinking more about the terrorist watch list.
Are the three mosque in Seattle being watched.
So the likelihood of BAFTE "watching you buy guns" for this operation is nil.
originally posted by: seattlerat
a reply to: seattlerat
I parked nearby the location and snapped a couple of photos. The intersection where the Mosque is situated already has a very fancy "traffic-cam" positioned kitty-corner from the main building. It has obviously has the ability to pan/tilt, and I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that it includes a WINDSHIELD WIPER! It is pointed in such a fashion that I'm sure they are able to easily capture most of the building even when it is not pointed directly at it (wide-angle lens)
As I mentioned in a previous post, I suspect that any of the surveillance agencies (you know who you are) could easily take control of these "traffic-cams" that are at many locations around the city. Some of them are at places where traffic is a problem (hard to find anywhere in this town where it IS NOT a problem), but I've noticed a number of them in areas where I would question WHY they are there at all.
Here are a couple of photos taken this morning at the Mosque in North Seattle:
As a side note, a couple of years ago I put up security cameras where I live due to problems with vandalism, harassment, and other issues like trespassing by suspicious individuals and peeping toms. One of my neighbors called the police (and my landlord) within a couple of days after she noticed them and asked them to force me to remove them. Apparently she decided that I was watching girls with them or some other illogical nonsense. This caused me a lot of problems, and it did not matter that the cameras weren't even functioning as I had not completed setting them up. The crazy thing (other than the woman who complained) is that there were already multiple cameras on other buildings pointing directly at this woman's residence (an old lady), but she didn't have a problem with them. I ended up taking the cameras down just to get her to leave me alone, but ever since this happened I have had to deal with multiple unrelated issues with this person and her relatives.
originally posted by: Bedlam
In some cities, DC the worst of all, you got biowarfare sensors mounted on the phone poles.