It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

#Guccifer2 and #Guccifer3 Trending on Twitter

page: 7
28
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 22 2016 @ 11:17 PM
link   
I would like to clear the water on some assumptions.

The hackers are in no way government affiliated. The hackers are not even all from the same country. Two of them have not interacted with the third. One is a follower of the other. There are more than 3.
There is no political agenda here beyond truth.
The hackers have been successful before but they are, except for the original Guccifer, Ghost hackers. This means that they change laptops, OS, accounts, and hacker identities regularly. Prior hacks were under different identities.
The Guccifer 2 twitter is authentic.
Only the DNC's db has been hacked because they and their warhawk nominee are the greater threat to the world and to the American people. They are the ones who lied, manipulated, and gamed the system and votes. Trump's rise is simply a phenomena of sheer stupidity. And while it may be harmful it is not a lie. Unless what we suspect is true and that Trump was simply a planned motivator to secure a Hillary vote.
Hit and miss, people.
Enjoy.




posted on Jun, 23 2016 @ 05:28 AM
link   
a reply to: B14ckC47

You have made a long list of assertions that you have baldly stated as fact. That calls for proof, or at the very least, evidence. Much of what you say is extremely questionable. Why attack Clinton but not Trump? Truth is truth, is it not>



posted on Jun, 25 2016 @ 05:19 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

I made such factual statements because I am in a position to make them with complete honesty. I do not owe you an explanation especially as such would definitely not be in the interest of my safety and anonymity.



posted on Jun, 25 2016 @ 05:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: B14ckC47
a reply to: DJW001

I made such factual statements because I am in a position to make them with complete honesty. I do not owe you an explanation especially as such would definitely not be in the interest of my safety and anonymity.


Your description of Clinton as a "warhawk" has me reevaluating my opinion again. That is the straight up Russian propaganda line. It certainly suggests that the agenda is not "simply truth."



posted on Jun, 25 2016 @ 06:45 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Warhawk is a term used by far more than the Russians. There is also Killary, Shillary, and more. You don't have to be Russian to say a word.
You know, I really wish this was government backed. Then there would be no fear of imprisonment, it would be a protected hack. As is, truth seeking hackers have the whole world against them with no backing or protection, the inability to reveal who they are, and thus an inability to be trusted and taken seriously by the ungrateful and suspicious masses they seek to assist.



posted on Jun, 25 2016 @ 07:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: B14ckC47
a reply to: DJW001

Warhawk is a term used by far more than the Russians. There is also Killary, Shillary, and more. You don't have to be Russian to say a word.
You know, I really wish this was government backed. Then there would be no fear of imprisonment, it would be a protected hack. As is, truth seeking hackers have the whole world against them with no backing or protection, the inability to reveal who they are, and thus an inability to be trusted and taken seriously by the ungrateful and suspicious masses they seek to assist.


Hey,you can always take refuge in Russia. If the hacker ideal is to give the public the information they need to make an informed, democratic choice, it is imperative that all sides are represented, otherwise it is just partisan propaganda.

Russia has made it clear that it would rather deal with a venal, narcissistic fool like Trump than a seasoned diplomat with experience "in the kitchen." Putin could convince Trump to recognize their annexation of Crimea by offering him a casino there with his name on it. Hillary would learn from Erdogan and draw a line that Putin wouldn't dare cross without losing face. Given Putin's aggression, which candidate is the greater danger? It's not up to Anonymous (or anyone else) to decide for the American people. That would be profoundly anti-democratic.

I guess hackers are just so brilliant that they could never find their informal network infiltrated and subverted by a professional intelligence agency with intent to interfere with another nation's democracy.




top topics
 
28
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join