In any conspiracy you have to "follow the money" to find out the who and the why.
Prior to the murder, polls showed five successive rises in the leave vote and falls for remain, so the trend was towards Brexit.
Then there was the battle of the Thames which (on social media) turned the narrative from immigrants to the working class versus the rich. Thanks to
Geldof's snide intervention.
He was due on question time that night and I for one could forsee the car crash that would have followed people having a go at him and his putting his
big fat foot further into his mouth.
Cameron due on Questions on Saturday facing the smae stuff plus the added fallout from whatever followed Geldof. Cambo is a rubbish debater so far and
every time he has been doing one of these shows the net is full of people castigating him.
So, in short it was looking like a continued shift towards leave, maybe to an unassailable lead by then.
Now, this murder happens, campaigning suspended by both camps....Except it wasn't, was it? The media has been awash with allegations pinning this on
Brexit, The star's front page was MP killed by Brexit Gunman...Just think about that. Then you had all the commentary on tv blaming everything from
brexit adverts and arguments through to just the idea of Brexit itself, not to mention people such as the slimy Polly Toynbee in the guardian putting
her boot in.
So we have now had 3 days of silence from leave and three days of insinuating that anyone who wants to leave has an association with Britain First
from the remain supporting media.
You can guarantee that any cogent argument between now and vote day from leave will be countered with "That's the kind of talk that led to Jo Cox's
murder." or something like it.
What I just wrote isn't conjecture, it's what has happened. So even if you hold the reasonable and more likely view that her actual killing wasn't a
conspiracy, you can certainly see how one side has been making hay on the back of it.
Now to the conspiracy bit (Which I must say, is entirely my own conjecture. I'm not saying this IS what happened, only what MIGHT have, we got that
The killer, a man said by people to be a pleasant loner (by all accounts, not overly friendly but not bad either)who seems to have had mental health
problems of long standing. (See the reference tohis voluntary work and his statement about it being better than medication etc in the press)
One neighbour said he liked gardening and going to the library to access the internet (Which implies he had no net of his own) Now, we know the net is
riddled with hate sites. Five minutes on google will confirm that for you. The net can be a dangerous place for anyone, but especially someone who has
The trouble is though, that you just can't access this stuff from a library. It is filtered up to the ying yang. Most libraries in the UK use Sophos
and you can see the categories they can block on their site, you can also read what the councils block through sites that show freedom of information
So how did he get radicalised?
An american anti racist charity came straight out with a ten year old net post showing him as a subscriber to an old, print version of a South African
race supremacy magazine and book orders for such things as "How to make a gun" (Which was said not to be the same as the gun in the shooting on the
How? How did they get that info so quickly? It smacks of them being fed it by someone to me.
Now I don't buy the whole MKULTRA mind control thing, but, we can all accept that if he had been wallowing in hate sites, for long enough, given his
mental state, he could become "radicalised" yes?
So what if he had a friend on the net who was able to feed him such stuff via email or in private chats? Maybe post him manuals and even, say, a gun
that was made on someone's workbench rather than in a factory?
They could have slowly radicalised the guy over time and, with all the stuff on the news about massive migration, bedroom taxes and austerity, just
imagine if he had received a letter from the DHSS telling him he was going to be evicted to make room for a Syrian family...Perhaps the number at the
top of the official letter went to someone who didn't actually work for the DHSS but pretended to and they said, "Nope, nothing you can do to fight
this, maybe go see your MP?"
His friend may ha have consoled him with statements such as they are all pigs and your MP only cares about refugees" etc.
He could have gone there, angry, confused, armed with the gun he obtained (complete with ammo, don't forget that) and nature took it's course.
The whole area is cordoned off, someone from an anti terror unit can see the letter and says to the copper "We need that, sign this official secrets
act or your life is over". and it vanishes.
Not exactly faking the moon landings crazy is it?
edit on 55pSat, 18 Jun 2016 06:47:55
-050020162016-06-18T06:47:55-05:00kAmerica/Chicago30000000k by SprocketUK because: comma
edit on 23pSat, 18 Jun 2016 06:48:23
-050020162016-06-18T06:48:23-05:00kAmerica/Chicago30000000k by SprocketUK because: spelling
edit on 46pSat, 18 Jun 2016 07:01:46
-050020162016-06-18T07:01:46-05:00kAmerica/Chicago30000000k by SprocketUK because: more spelling