Clinton emails on film

Due to the suppression of the video tapes of the depositions from Hillary's staff.

This guy took the transcripts and had actors play them out.

I haven't watched it yet and there will be more to come when he gets the transcripts.

It would seem to be quite an interesting project.

LOL

Oh this is great !!!!

a reply to: burgerbuddy


Hillary is a lesbian you know?

SPAM REMOVED BY ADMIN

Weird. I started watching the video and after a minute or two my internet goes down. Anyone else have issue's?

a reply to: sirlancelot

Nope, running fine.

I watched the whole thing. It is very revealing, very well done

I watched through 21 of the 28 minutes.
It was well acted. But it was acted.
As a life long theater person, I enjoyed the dramatic retelling, But that only shows us the director's and actors interpretation. It does nothing to show the truth of the situation.

SPAM REMOVED BY ADMIN

I watched both of them. The Chris Wells one shows an attempt to pry open this investigation wide open. But it keeps falling short due to selective memory. With so many of our government officials having such a bad recall of memory for anything that is important, it makes me feel less secure about our countries own well being.

originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
I watched through 21 of the 28 minutes.
It was well acted. But it was acted.
As a life long theater person, I enjoyed the dramatic retelling, But that only shows us the director's and actors interpretation. It does nothing to show the truth of the situation.

Well?

Would you rather read the transcripts?

Most people would glaze over after the first page so as a visual with actors appeals to a vastly wider audience.

It's not a Hollywood production with Jack Nicholson and Oprah.

Also, the parts were already written in real time by real people so not a lot of room for improvising on the part of the director and actors.

I am glad he is doing this.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Between a dramatic interpretation or reading the transcripts. I would choose the transcripts.
They read like a script, I'm used to reading scripts.

The words were said in real time, with real people.
When you only have the words, you have an infinite opportunity for interpretation.

For example this simple sentence (not related to the videos):
I did not see her kill that woman.

Has 6 different meanings depending on which word is emphasized, 7 if no word is emphasized. And that doesn't account for any body language associated with the statement.

ETA: I would prefer to watch the actual taped statements.

originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Between a dramatic interpretation or reading the transcripts. I would choose the transcripts.
They read like a script, I'm used to reading scripts.

The words were said in real time, with real people.
When you only have the words, you have an infinite opportunity for interpretation.

For example this simple sentence (not related to the videos):
I did not see her kill that woman.

Has 6 different meanings depending on which word is emphasized, 7 if no word is emphasized. And that doesn't account for any body language associated with the statement.

ETA: I would prefer to watch the actual taped statements.

I agree but this is what we got.

My wife and I translate scripts for subtitles. I also do some acting and read scripts for parts.

I would think that this script is open to interpretation by the actor based on what the dialog is and not under a directors wants for drama or not.

Here is Pagliano's testimony, lol. Gotta wonder wtf is going on.

Huma I guess will be next.

Here is Steven Mull, I'm not sure I've heard of this guy in relation to the emails.

But interesting, nonetheless.

I have Huma Abedin's re enactment.

She talks more than the others.

More interesting than the others. I think she is a weak link. lol.