It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
lol, this is about the theories to why, no more adding to the never ending list, lol...
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: SaturnFX
Man, why do I love that song so much!
anyway....
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Not another mandeler effect I can't take any more.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: SeaWorthy
Very interesting theory! Are there any conspiracies of this particle being hidden from the public all through the past etc? Has it been detected or suspected in our past history by anyone etc?
originally posted by: hidingthistime
I see it is related to the thread though, as it is more of a WHY thread than a what were all the different MEs thread.
originally posted by: solargeddon
a reply to: SeaWorthy
Ok, over the initial awe of your post....could the singlet perhaps in the future have been manipulated to stamp out the Y2k problem?
Serious question, I know it isn't quite related to the Mandela effect, but I thought it worth posing given they are hypothetically thought to be capable of time travel.
Why did this happen, how was it caused, etc, why was 2008 such a big year for it too etc?
"Crazy" neutrino find has many physicists skeptical, still backing Einstein. Workers help build the neutrino-beam facility used at CERN to shoot particles to Italy in a 2005 picture. Neutrinos—ghostly subatomic particles—may have been observed traveling faster than the speed of light, scientists announced this week.Sep 24, 2011
Particles that travel faster than light would smash a hole in Albert Einstein's 1905 theory of special relativity, a cornerstone of modern physics.
Read more at: phys.org...
originally posted by: Maverick1
Fuzzy. Wuzzy. Soap.
I think this soap is actually an articfact of a parallel reality.
I mean, dude, it GREW HAIR and I clearly remember it. Yep, 21st century: soap that grew hair! Not on the user, that is, but on the soap itself!
originally posted by: solargeddon
a reply to: hidingthistime
All I know as far as the Mandela effect goes...I find it hard to accept Oscar Wilde wrote a book substituting the word picture for portrait, not only do I believe the book is called "The Portrait of Dorian Gray" I find it illogical for the era it was written that Wilde would have used the word picture in his title.
Am example form the 1800s: Charlotte Bronte used the word picture in her novel Jane Eyre when she wrote, ‘The letter-press…I cared little for…Each picture told a story.’
en.wikipedia.org...
The Picture of Dorian Gray begins on a beautiful summer day in Victorian era England, where Lord Henry Wotton, an opinionated man, is observing the sensitive artist Basil Hallward painting the portrait of Dorian Gray
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: SeaWorthy
Very interesting theory! Are there any conspiracies of this particle being hidden from the public all through the past etc? Has it been detected or suspected in our past history by anyone etc?
Go Deeper
Picks for further reading
The Nature of Reality: Trap Doors in Time and Space: Teleportation, Time Travel, and Escape from Black Holes
Seth Lloyd, professor of quantum-mechanical engineering at MIT, investigates hypothetical methods of time travel, both forward and back.
originally posted by: vlawde
originally posted by: hidingthistime
Ok, so they still spelled it right at the bottom, but, what are your theories? Most of us already have memorized by heart the 50000 changes, but I am more interested in the HOWs.....
HOW did all of those things change????
Nothing has changed: www.debunkingmandelaeffects.com...
steins gate
January 26, 2016 at 5:39 am | Reply
IT IS CHIC-FIL-A, I am more certain of that than what I ate for breakfast. I dismissed all other mandela effects as possible mis-hearing/remembering, I rembered berenstein, but figured it could have been berenstain, but this absolutely tripped me out. I remember the first time I went to chic-fil-a (in Oklahoma) I asked my dad why chic was spelled wrong, this memory is absolute, and only this has convinced me there is something to the mandela effect.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: solargeddon
Absolutly, it was portrait, and that is one example of why I think, either super natural, or time travelor with humour, as they all seem so deliberate and obvious.
They are all the most memorised lines etc, things that most people know, so to me it is not just random I feel.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
It was always Chic-fil-A. I remember people laughing at me when I first moved to Atlanta and spelled it Chick-fil-A in an email, and I lookled it up to make sure, and sure enough, they were right...it was Chic-fil-A. So this one I am not forgetting.
I noticed a few months ago that it was Chick-fil-A now I did a double take and figured they finally just changed it.