It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
6 people no glass
don't Remember Jackie being a suspect
There was definitely 4 people. The driver, the texas governor, JFK and Jackie. I remember all my friends said how odd it was that the driver and Jackie miraculously didn't get a scratch on them. There was never any mention of the other people in the car in our conversations because everyone else wasn't in the car. So weird! Great video to bring to
no partition only 4 people
I remember 4 and the car was lighter in color.
I remember 6 and the story of Jackie is totally new...
also I never ever ever saw it in color
2 up front, 4 in back. No glass. On the 22.
There were 4 in the car no more than 5 if the govener Conley wife was in tbe car, 2 secret service on the back of the car, JFK died on Nov 22 1963..
There was no other woman in that car! Wtf! There was no bullet proof glass between the driver and passengers either.
what the heck is that ? that's the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen six people and a bigger car omg hahaha no fn way sorry
only 4 people .
connley was hit in the front seat
i never heard about the Jackie story till a few days ago
i first saw the video clip of this a couple years ago on youtube, and even though it seemed like there were 4 people in the car, i can't be completely sure about that, but i DO remember the car being white instead of black!! wtf
i dont re' member blood nor jackie being a suspect....there were only 4 people in a drop top convertable vehicle....jackie and her husband in the back and two CIA/FBI agents in the front with one of them driving and the other on the passenger side and what is moor, there were no bystanders on the grass on jackies side when kennedy got shot twice....the first shot he fell forward and the second shot he fell backword with his head lying on the trunk of the car....that is when jackie tried to get out....no blood splatter during the shots and no footage of the bloody car evidence and if they had it they never showed it to the public....and the footage were in black n white and not technicolour.....this is a first for me.....
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: reldra
In my timeline Nixon won.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: reldra
Well he won once, but in 1968. lol
I meant in 1960. In my timeline the dead people in Chicago did not vote.
There is a lot of masonic ritual around the JFK assassination. The luciferians use 333 and 666 in time intervals quite often. Look at this 333 week interval.www.timeanddate.com... assassination took place close to 97Wlon and 33Nlat. 33 Nlat has a tremendous amount of dark ritual on it. The 97th degree of egptian masonry is reserved for the black pope, the grand hierophant.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: UnBreakable
If you don't like the Mandela Effect, you should stay out of the threads. I don't go post huge internet memes in say, Cryptozoology. If you have something useful to contribute, fine. But that is not useful.
Like Atheists should not go in random threads in Religion and just say 'how can you worship your Sky God?"
Not helpful. It is clutter.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: UnBreakable
If you don't like the Mandela Effect, you should stay out of the threads. I don't go post huge internet memes in say, Cryptozoology. If you have something useful to contribute, fine. But that is not useful.
Like Atheists should not go in random threads in Religion and just say 'how can you worship your Sky God?"
Not helpful. It is clutter.
Problem is, I DO like the ME. I like to see how much people say how things didn't exist, when in fact, they did. And despite your requested censorship, I'll go into any forum I damn well please and post anything I want, unless a mod (which you are not one) decides to remove it.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: UnBreakable
If you don't like the Mandela Effect, you should stay out of the threads. I don't go post huge internet memes in say, Cryptozoology. If you have something useful to contribute, fine. But that is not useful.
Like Atheists should not go in random threads in Religion and just say 'how can you worship your Sky God?"
Not helpful. It is clutter.
Problem is, I DO like the ME. I like to see how much people say how things didn't exist, when in fact, they did. And despite your requested censorship, I'll go into any forum I damn well please and post anything I want, unless a mod (which you are not one) decides to remove it.
first, I didn't ask for censorship. I mentioned what I feel to be clutter. You can do with that what you will.
I'm sorry if I took it the wrong way. But The ME is pretty much all about what existed in whatever timeline you were in. So to say 'how things didn't exist, when in fact they did' is a contradiction to the entire idea.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: UnBreakable
If you don't like the Mandela Effect, you should stay out of the threads. I don't go post huge internet memes in say, Cryptozoology. If you have something useful to contribute, fine. But that is not useful.
Like Atheists should not go in random threads in Religion and just say 'how can you worship your Sky God?"
Not helpful. It is clutter.
Problem is, I DO like the ME. I like to see how much people say how things didn't exist, when in fact, they did. And despite your requested censorship, I'll go into any forum I damn well please and post anything I want, unless a mod (which you are not one) decides to remove it.
first, I didn't ask for censorship. I mentioned what I feel to be clutter. You can do with that what you will.
I'm sorry if I took it the wrong way. But The ME is pretty much all about what existed in whatever timeline you were in. So to say 'how things didn't exist, when in fact they did' is a contradiction to the entire idea.
I apologize for my snarky response, but that's the point. As you allude to, the ME is an 'idea', not a proven fact. We as humans would rather blame multiple timelines, rather than admit we have faulty memories.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: UnBreakable
If you don't like the Mandela Effect, you should stay out of the threads. I don't go post huge internet memes in say, Cryptozoology. If you have something useful to contribute, fine. But that is not useful.
Like Atheists should not go in random threads in Religion and just say 'how can you worship your Sky God?"
Not helpful. It is clutter.
Problem is, I DO like the ME. I like to see how much people say how things didn't exist, when in fact, they did. And despite your requested censorship, I'll go into any forum I damn well please and post anything I want, unless a mod (which you are not one) decides to remove it.
first, I didn't ask for censorship. I mentioned what I feel to be clutter. You can do with that what you will.
I'm sorry if I took it the wrong way. But The ME is pretty much all about what existed in whatever timeline you were in. So to say 'how things didn't exist, when in fact they did' is a contradiction to the entire idea.
I apologize for my snarky response, but that's the point. As you allude to, the ME is an 'idea', not a proven fact. We as humans would rather blame multiple timelines, rather than admit we have faulty memories.
I happen to believe much of it is not 'faulty memory'. Especially on topics I have estensively studied. You stated you like the ME. Saying it is due to faulty memories does not match that.