It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: shredderofsouls
A felon already can not buy or own a weapon. Someone with known mental issues can not own or buy a weapon. These along with murder are already laws. So please oh superior one, tell me how more laws will fix this.
originally posted by: shredderofsouls
originally posted by: atomish
How do you not see by making it more difficult for "those people" with these measures, you are making it more difficult on everyone?
Infringement is the word you are looking for. You are asking to infringe against all PEOPLE because SOME PEOPLE do bad things.
I have no criminal record, I am currently not under investigation , I have no ties to criminal activity and I have no mental health issues, so if I want a gun I can get one..even if the laws were stricter.
Now though, if I had any of those issue, I can still get a gun because people want it easy when they go for a gun and you see no issue with that.
originally posted by: shredderofsouls
Some Gun owners are disgusting, the fact that another killing spree has happened means nothing to them, just as long as they get theirs guns.
If your all legit and there is no reason to think your violent than what is the big deal if the government wants to make it harder for the insane and criminals to get guns?
I have no issue with people owning guns just as long they have had the training, have had a thorough background check and hopefully are mentally fit to own one.
Saw these on a meme and it is correct...
"gun don't kill people"
Well no sh*t
We want...mandatory safety courses for...PEOPLE, not guns.
We want...more thorough background checks of...PEOPLE, not guns.
We want...stricter negligence penalties imposed on...PEOPLE, guns.
If you're stupid enough to think activists are pi**ed at guns, you're too stupid to own one!
originally posted by: BoxFulder
a reply to: JinMI
No it's no hoop to jump through than the regular background check there is a fingerprint sensor or inkpad where you stamp fingerprint on, you get approved its your gun and only your gun. You want to sell your gun to another legal gun owner just submit the new fingerprint. Ita not gonna be a hassle or impediment to the legal gun owner. Criminals in Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis etc yeah it will be a pain in the ass to them
originally posted by: joemoe
a reply to: BoxFulder
You do realize a firearm is a very simple machanical device when you think of it and for good reason. The simplicity makes it reliable. Adding electronic device to firearms will only make them more prone to failure. But since they are pretty simple technology, anything electronic will be simple to defeat.
originally posted by: BoxFulder
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
You are missing my point didn't say anything about gun free zones. That to me doesn't make sense either. Its a 2nd amendment right.....except for these areas exactly right dumb. Criminals will get guns anyways. That's why with fingerprint identifiers it will stop the black market trade of guns, put guns into rightful gun owners hands and make crime solving easier.