It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama's mindset on Terrorism is dangerous

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+4 more 
posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 11:59 AM
link   
I'm listening to his speech and I'm wondering if he's just lying or he truly doesn't understand what's going on. He's having a debate about the merits of Islam the Religion. He acts like he has to defend Islam against stupid Americans when 9/11 happened and you didn't have this huge backlash against Muslims. It's amazing to me that Obama makes this very Asinine argument.

Islam isn't just a Religion, Islam is a Government. This is why ISIS call themselves the Islamic State. You have Governments in the Middle East that our stuck in the 6th Century and run their Governments based on a Religion from the 6th century. This is a recipe for disaster and you have Muslims growing up that are hostile to the modern world. This has to stop.

We need to brutally attack ISIS. There then needs to be a summit with world leaders and we have to demand that some Middle East Countries become more modern. We're on the verge of technologies that can kill 100,000 people at a time not 50. We can't have apart of the world that's still stuck in the 6th Century.

Again, Obama is defending the Religion of Islam and it makes no sense. Where are all of these Muslims being beheaded, burned alive and skinned alive by Americans?

This also occurred when the Catholic Church was the power behind Governments in Europe. These Countries were trying to run their Governments based on dictates from the Pope and it was chaos. You eventually had the Reformation, Enlightenment and then America.

So of course you say Radical Islam and people are not so stupid that they don't understand that radical Islam doesn't mean all Muslims. The fact that Obama is having a theoretical debate about the merits of the Religion of Islam is astounding. This is a war against the Islamic State not the Religion of Islam. All Christians or Catholics weren't fanatics but should we wipe the words Christian and Catholic out of the History books when we talk about the Crusades or the Spanish Inquisition? Obama would never make this argument but this is the argument he's making about Islam today. His whole speech was a defense of Islam the Religion and nobodies talking about going to war on a Religion.




posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

I have allot of respect for evil, it's smart, cunning and understands just how easy it is to blind the mortals of this world. 1 evil act creates a domino affect of hate, brutality and narcissist behavior ,and it blinds humans with no respect or integrity of one's human soul.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 12:20 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Maybe obama is a closet Muslim, he certainly has all the characteristics of a Manchurian candidate.

Cheers - Dave


+1 more 
posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 12:21 PM
link   
Obama: 'There's no magic to the phrase radical Islam'


Obama, who appeared visibly angry at times during his remarks, took on criticism from Trump and other Republicans that he has refused to use the phrase "radical Islam," calling it a "political distraction."

"What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change?” Obama asked.

“Would it make ISIL less committed to trying to kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this?” he continued. "The answer is none of the above. Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction.”


I honestly think the PC culture has become a mental disorder.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 12:37 PM
link   


Obama's mindset on Terrorism is dangerous

Wait , we have ISIS on the run , dont we ? And they were just the Junior Varsity Team , correct ?
Yes dangerous to the world. But Obama is no way stupid , etc. His reaction to all this was planned from the start .



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 12:59 PM
link   
A pox on both parties for their stupidity. One party wants to raise money to lobby to take guns away from everyone except "the authorities" while the other party wants to raise money to lobby for making war on anyone who disagrees with their viewpoint. No matter their viewpoint---they are out for more money for their party/cause and the rest of us can go suck eggs. Seems to me that the mental disorder is a love of money and power and has infected the entirety of both major parties. They have grown so far removed from the reality of daily life for the ordinary citizen that they can't get their twisted brains to form coherent thoughts anymore.
Both parties were complicit in running guns to Mexican drug cartels. Both parties were complicit in sending troops to the middle east and killing hundreds of thousands in attempts to do what? Change hearts and minds by killing people? Both parties are complicit in allowing immigration laws to be blatantly ignored and broken. Face it the government we now enjoy is lawless and it is "we the people" who are paying for this lawlessness and encouraging it when we parrot what either party is crusading for or against. Jesse Ventura was spot-on when he described the parties as glorified gangs of thugs.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 01:25 PM
link   
I actually think he is being very smart.

Talking about fighting "radical Islam" in the context of terrorism sends out a message to a lot of people in the world that America is at war with Islam not just a very small proportion of its followers. In fact when you look into the motivation of individual terrorists the often site the reason they are fighting is to defend Islam who they feel the west is at war with.

With Obama moving away form this language he is sending a message to the Islamic world that says we understand we are not at war with your faith. Its really quite powerful and in my view the right language to use.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 01:26 PM
link   
He's the head of the this beast! In many people's opinion And the trail of evidence would in normal sane societies have him behind bars or executed for treason.

It seems that alot of people in miitary, in government and in policing authority positions are part of the problem, they're all on this dark side team of destruction of the western world.

So we have to stop playing victims, and stand in our power, and start to problem solve.

We have to all get really mad like Alex Jones, on steroids even, and phone in by the millions demanding action, pay visits to our appointed ones and police, in huge groups and remember they can easily deal with a few thousand rioters, but thousands or millions sitting down on the road and refusing to budge or holding non stop general strike, they can't even begin to deal with wide awake people standing in their own power and refusing this tyranny!



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 01:27 PM
link   
Another point, Trump is the boogie man for wanting to close borders and vet in whomever may enter? REALLY?

It doesnt matter if you're liberal, or conservative, Bush, Obama, Hillary, Trump or any other elected one or potential, all governments are under the constitution and laws, and oaths of office.

No government, of any stripe, elected, can grossly endanger the population by bringing in terrorists or any high risk groups. Its completely illegal. TREASON!



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Thats like... your opinion man.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 01:47 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 01:47 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Islam is not a government, it is a religion. Practitioners of Islam are called Islamic or Muslim. Islamic people that wish for their government to be based on their religion are called Theocratic.


Islam (/ˈɪslɑːm/;[note 1] Arabic: الإسلام‎‎, al-ʾIslām IPA: [alʔisˈlaːm] ( listen)[note 2]) is a monotheistic and Abrahamic religion articulated by the Qur'an, a religious text considered by its adherents to be the verbatim word of God (Allāh), and, for the vast majority of adherents, by the teachings and normative example (called the sunnah, composed of accounts called hadith) of Muhammad (c. 570–8 June 632 CE). An adherent of Islam is called a Muslim (sometimes spelled "Moslem").[1] Muslims believe that God is one and incomparable[2] and that the purpose of existence is to worship God.[3] Nearly all Muslims consider Muhammad to be the last prophet of God.


Wikipedia



theocracy
[thee-ok-ruh-see]
1. a form of government in which God or a deity is recognized as the supreme civil ruler, the God's or deity's laws being interpreted by the ecclesiastical authorities.

2. a system of government by priests claiming a divine commission.

3. a commonwealth or state under such a form or system of government.


dictionary.com

People defend Islam when there's a terrorist attack committed by people who claim to be Muslim because when it happens the whole religion comes under attack. Obama is just a hypocrite mouthing words the rest of us defending Islam actually feel. If he actually wanted to protect and defend Muslims he'd change his Middle East strategy.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 01:55 PM
link   
Obama's mindset on Terrorism is dangerous

You have to love it though.

When it comes to right wing neocon's clinging to their guns and religion.

The only time O and his supporters defend it is when it's 'muslims'.

Every other day of the weak they disparage those other right wing neocon's.

Don't you just LOVE the smell of hypocrisy ?


edit on 14-6-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Where's your labeling when Christians commit acts of terror? Where's your labeling when a white supremacist goes on a shooting spree? Not in such a hurry for labels then, are you?



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

There's more of that hypocrisy.

Christian terrorist eh.

White supremacists eh.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 02:15 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I figured you wouldn't like those labels.

Why is it only important to label when it's an Islamic terrorist?



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96

I figured you wouldn't like those labels.

Why is it only important to label when it's an Islamic terrorist?


Alright if you want to talk about labels.

Let's talk about 'mass shooting', 'gun violence','Assault weapons', and the over 80 years of BIGOTRY gun owners have experienced.

Ya know the countries first 'terrorists'.



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

State religion

guess what the majority is ...




posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 02:25 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Eighty years of bigotry?!

LOL

Why so fragile!?



posted on Jun, 14 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   
The objective of the Muslim Brotherhood is the usurpation and replacement of the law and constitution with sharia law by any definition this is treason and anyone that participates in or aids or abets this process is a traitor.That includes Presidents and Secretaries of state.




top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join