False Flag Alert: Orlando Shooting

I don't watch TV, so when an event like this happens, i always wait a few days, to investigate the matter further. I like to get a better feel as to what is really going on. So, when i turned on the TV this morning, i caught a glimpse of the PSY-OP at hand.

1st. The gay pride flag was waving high.
2nd. The club just did a drill, for the same type of event, 3 days prior to the event actually happening.
3rd. Guns
4th. Muslims
5th. Family fun location (Orlando)
6th. 1 victim being carried out by 5 people????

A "Muslim" opens fire at a "gay" club, during "gay pride", in a city known to be safe for families??? And no one questions the "official story"? Riiiiiiight. Well, i've seen enough of these "events" to challenge the "official story". Let's put the pieces together, and see the BIG PICTURE.

https:/ /saboteur365.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/first-suggestion-the-orlando-gay-nightclub-shooting-was-a-drill-leading-to-gun-confiscation/

Another drill? Maybe. Mass shooting at a gay bar and there is a hostage situation. I question the validity because as the shooter opened fire the restaurant the club took a moment to update their FB page telling everyone to “run and keep running”

False flag all the way. Shooting starts at 2:02 am, but continues for THREE hours???!!!?? Shooter killed at 5 a.m.???!!! Police officer on the scene but no law enforcement moves in immediately for back up???!!! No cell phone videos from the people in there??? No camera footage from the club cameras?? Why didn’t the news report the initial shots fired? Where is the triage scene? Why was the trauma hospital locked down (guess: no interviewing the nightclub patrons allowed!!) I could go on and on….very poor acting job on the “crying” white lady asking where her son was…man, can’t they come up with better actors???

Veterans Today. Orlando nightclub shooting. Yet, another false flag?

Will the alleged perpetrator be interrogated to find out what he did or did not do, what his motives may have been, and who his associates were? Apparently not. Once again, we see the “perp shot dead, will never be interrogated or tried” syndrome. If international terrorism sponsored by groups like ISIS were really what it is made out to be, obviously live captures of all suspected terrorists would be the top priority, so interrogations could take place and terror networks taken down.

Another major indicator of “false flag” is the scale of the carnage. More than 50 dead? Only one shooter? And the guy was not even a special forces professional, but a flaky security guard?!

We were told, almost immediately after the Orlando shooting, that “the shooter had pledged allegiance to ISIS.” Robert David Steele remarks: “The tape pledging allegiance to ISIS is patsy perfect.” And since ISIS is a Western public relations operation, a 4th generation warfare psy-op, the ISIS pledge in itself pretty much proves that the shooting was an inside job.

Professional killers i.e. multiple shooters may have done the damage and/or assisted the patsy, as appears to have been the case in many other false flags including the Fort Hood shooting, the Batman theater shooting, the Sikh Temple shooting, and the more recent Paris and San Bernardino shootings. Robert David Steele remarks: “Multiple shooters are detected by proper forensics on all bullet paths and all spent rounds.

Orlando, Florida. Home to Disney World and consequently the destination of so many families and their children over generations, it has become the one location you go to get away from it all.

Pakistani defense analyst Zaid Hamid tweets: “Is this a co-incidence that the shooter worked for a private mercenary contracting outfit G4S which is close to Mossad/MI5/CIA??”

From George Washington’s blog: “Mateen worked for the British company G4S since 2007. Throughout that time, G4S has been what people might call a private, special operations military outfit. It is said to be three times the size of the British military.

From Tomato Bubble: “The producers at LHS (Langley-Hollywood Studios) have really, and we do mean really, “pushed the envelope” with this latest stunt involving the “Pulse” sodomite club in Orlando, Florida — setting an astonishing, and we do mean astonishing “lone gunman” record of 50 kills plus 53 wounded!

Another piece of information i'm desperately looking for, is where the nightclub manager says they were performing "DRILLS" for the same type of attack, 3 DAYS PRIOR. I saw it last night, on the news, but i can't find an article or video on the net.

And, just for the record: "Drills" look the same as the real thing. A passer-by couldn't tell the difference between a "drill" and a "live" event. The difference between a "drill" and a "live" event; what the "drills" lack, is emotion. Trust me, if 100 people were attacked, 50 dead, 53 wounded, it would be MUCH MORE DRAMATIC; MUCH MORE CHAOTIC.

IDK, i just don't see the reality in this attack. 1 person kills 50 and wounds 53? ONE PERSON? ONE???? How did he manage that? Please, enlighten me???? No one tried to play superhero???

Oh, that's right. They were too busy posting on facebook. lol

I didn't even dig into the numerology of this event. There's no need to investigate the matter further. It's an OBVIOUS "false flag", with an LGBT agenda, behind. Might as well throw in some Muslim hate.

We say: love, love, love. But, we hate, hate, hate Muslims. Love the homosexual. Hate the Muslim. (And NO, i'm NOT A MUSLIM...FOR THE RECORD! And NO! I don't agree with who they "worship" but, that's another topic of discussion)

FACT IS: Not one shred of evidence has linked "Muslims" to terrorism, since terrorism became a popular word. Everything is "terror" based, unless it comes from a drone. Then, that's called "safety and security". _javascript:hyperlink()

We have the "right to bear arms" but when things like this happens, NO ONE IS PACKING HEAT? hahahahahahah Right. Sure. Long live the 2nd Amendment.

Let me go ahead and add this RIDICULOUS news STORY:

Mother Feared the Worst After Texting With Son Inside Orlando Nightclub

I'll even go out of my way to post the actual message.


Only brainwashed individuals could believe this non-sense because it makes NO sense!

Mod note, since this was moved to Skunk Works:

It's not like i'm talking about UFO's or moon landings. False flags ARE real and have been admitted by governments, around the world. Why should this "event" be treated any differently? In fact, anything under "Orlando Shootings" should be considered "Skunk Works", if there has been no real proof of an actual shooting. Regurgitating what the MSM spits out can't and shouldn't be considered "facts" or "proof".

What makes their info more valuable than this info???

42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”.

Anders Behring Breivik killed 77 people and injured lots more. He was a loan gunman.

Veteran's Today? Come on!

Also, saw your hater post before it was removed in the other thread. So, not buying the Gays Agenda False Flag thingy. You, know GAFF?

a reply to: JuJuBee

"Disgusting" "sentiment" "that" "is " "all".

I think you aught to look up what G4S is about.It aint a special military unit it's a private company that provides prisons, prisoner escort, money transfer security and low grade security for such things as pop concerts.
In the UK G4S are well known 2nd rate security firm. They do not undertake any military operations.

this didnt take too long to pop up... at least wait until the victims get laid to peaceful rest before connecting dots to make dots to connect.

a reply to: JuJuBee

Every time there's a shooting, there's an ATS member who comes out with this false flag nonsense.

Is there ever an event which is not a 'false flag'?

It gets even more disgusting when people start 'analysing' photos and looking for 'crisis actors'. No respect.

a reply to: crayzeed

Yeah I have friends who work for this "elite military group" and they sit in trailers all day and sign in semi-trucks. I'm sure there's different levels at G4S but I certainly haven't ever seen anything other than the "Mall Cop" one.

What a load of crap. Why on earth ever entirely fake a 'false flag?'

originally posted by: cuckooold
a reply to: JuJuBee

Every time there's a shooting, there's an ATS member who comes out with this false flag nonsense.

Is there ever an event which is not a 'false flag'?

It gets even more disgusting when people start 'analysing' photos and looking for 'crisis actors'. No respect.

Yeah and every one of them pretends like they are the lone wolf in saying it too.

a reply to: JuJuBee

It must be so terribly sad to lead a life of denial.

1. Disgruntled, angry young man
2. Legally purchased assault rifle
3. Devesatingly tragic loss of human life

This actions of one deranged individual does not equate to a government conspiracy.

Ok, so you find a few holes in a story, and it's automatically a government conspiracy to make us love homosexuals and hate Muslims?

....What?

a reply to: DeadFoot

its best not to think about this nonsensical rubbish. best to let this thread fade into obscurity.

a reply to: JuJuBee

A few things are wrong with your "list" for false flags...

1) There has never been a shooting of this magnitude involving the gay community within the US.

2) This may only be the (flimsy) close to red flag anyone could use to "justify" this. Then again, every business has a plan for terrorists attacks or criminal behavior. Timing may be coincidental.

3) Guns... What? Are you saying this because you believe they are trying to push an agenda? Elaborate please.

4) Again, elaborate.

5) So...the other "false flags" are in other locations that don't involve "family fun" as in Schools and such Sandy Hook.

6) Have you ever carried an uncoscious body? If you don't have the body mass to hoist it alone and the more people you have the easier it is to move them faster...

I didn't bother reading the rest

This was an interesting comment from below the linked article.
I haven't confirmed its validity.

"Watching you tube of ABC interviewing eye witness. His name was Luis Burbano. Looked up the name. Low and behold, the first hit was a IMDB sire. Luis is an actor with quite a few movies under his belt. Can we say crisis actor?"

I am going to wait and see what else comes up before I take a stance either way. Info is still flooding in.

But, I am not going to shame you for bringing a conspiracy to a conspiracy site.

It is tragic when people die, but I would like to know the whole story, so I can be safe really.
I also worry about whay draconian laws will be pushed through, so we are "safe".

a reply to: Mandroid7

Sure I can say "crisis actor", so how about you can you say "circumstantial evidence"?

originally posted by: EnigmaAgent
Anders Behring Breivik killed 77 people and injured lots more. He was a loan gunman.

If that's what you want to believe. Did YOU, with your EYES........SEE IT? If not, how can you be sooooooooo sure?

DID YOU SEE HIM KILL ANYONE???????

DID....YOU....SEEE....IT.

If not, that would be considered GOSSIP! Spreading rumors.

originally posted by: DeadFoot
Ok, so you find a few holes in a story, and it's automatically a government conspiracy to make us love homosexuals and hate Muslims?

....What?

A few holes in the story is enough. Isn't it? How many holes were in 9-11's "official story"? How many lies do your friends need to tell you, before you quit being friends with that person???? The government doesn't even like you, and yet, you still cheesin' on them?

Wow.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I just said interesting. Can you understand interesting?

I totally understand it is circumstantial, I thought it was interesting because another poster actually said
Now they will look for crisis actorss...

a reply to: Mandroid7

So you don't plan on supporting your "interesting" remark? So what's the point of bringing it up? It doesn't prove anything and just shows that some guy on a website somewhere can string some circumstances together to create circumstantial evidence to spin this unsound narrative that the Orlando shooting was a false flag.

I don't find it "interesting" at all actually. I find it agenda driven and likely fueled by a confirmation bias. So what do you say to that?