It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: neo96
why cant' a mass shooting also be an act of terrorism?
Because TERRORIST use what ever is around them.
There's been 40 years of proof.
so a terrorist that shoots a mass group of people with a gun doesn't count as a mass shooting in your mind? that makes no sense
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: neo96
why cant' a mass shooting also be an act of terrorism?
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: DancedWithWolves
a reply to: JimBielson
This man was investigated twice, and cleared by the FBI twice with both investigations closed. If someone is willing to die to kill you, we can't make you "safe." Life comes with risks. Freedom comes with risks.
Enjoy each day you are alive with more tolerance and compassion and less blame and hate. That alone makes you safe. The rest, even eating bacon, is a roll of the dice.
Peace
He was NOT cleared by the bureau. He was interviewed twice and the results were inconclusive.
They are NOT the same thing when it comes to an investigation.
originally posted by: JimBielson
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: JimBielson
ill repeat myself, congress and the nra does not want stricter gun laws. they block obama. obama wants stricter gun laws on people on watch lists but he can't do it because conservatives wont let him. what exactly do you want him to do? convict people that havent done anything yet? put anyone in prison that looks shady?
No, I expect him to do his job with the tools he has. You further my suspicion by saying Obama's hands are tied. As many tools that he / they have, that we know about and many we dont this guy was free to slaughter. Just because someone says no, you cant have that does not mean you throw a tantrum and just let a massacre take place.
That is exactly what Obama did. He knew the target and he was warned about the terrorist that did the deed. That is all we need to know.
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: Konduit
we could have said the same thing about christians at one point. christianity has had the luxury of secularism. there is no reasons why muslims cant live a secular life. most do, most interpret islam in a non violent way, just like christians chose to do. moderation in islam is obviously more common in western culture.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: neo96
why cant' a mass shooting also be an act of terrorism?
Because TERRORIST use what ever is around them.
There's been 40 years of proof.
so a terrorist that shoots a mass group of people with a gun doesn't count as a mass shooting in your mind? that makes no sense
No it doesn't.
Not a mass shooting. A TERRORIST ATTACK.
There is a difference especially how LEO handles it, and the US government handles it.
I know why some are calling it a 'mass shooting' though.
Because it takes heat off the epic failure of the NSA and the surveillance state, and the EPIC failure of the administrations foreign policy.
And it creates OPPORTUNITY to push draconian LAWS.
originally posted by: JimBielson
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: JimBielson
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: JimBielson
right so out of all those muslims that were checked, where this american born terrorist on that list?
I think you use the term "checked" very loosely. Again, this American born terrorist was on a list, a FBI list. He was on a list that Obama and his minions decided to ignore. If he is going to ignore an American born Muslim Terrorist, what do you think he is ignoring with those 680,000 his is letting in will nilly? It really doenst take much reasoning and logic to question his motives here. I think we all know exactly what Obama is doing.
so you would hate obama for nsa and spying on us, then you hate him for not doing enough? should he stick a wire up our butts? because then we'd be safe and you couldnt hate on him for not doing his job. its a loose-loose situation for conservatives, obama is either fringing on our privacy or he's not keeping us safe.
Man you are fringe.. His job is to protect Americans. He failed and you seem to want to deflect from that. If he is not man enough to do his job he needs to step down. Whos fault is this? Answer the question already... Its not mine because I am a conservative.
Are you saying Obama with his pen and his phone couldn't do anything about this but he can by executive fiat do others? Give me a break already...
I expect Obama to go about the job of protecting America. He had a warning on location, he had a warning about the Muslim Terrorist getting ready to blow.
How much more do we need to say our President is incompetent and that incompetence led to a massacre last night?
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
About a year ago I had predicted something like this would happen. I was even having the conversation with my former boss, owner of Honey Pot in Tampa.
All of his security personnel are armed at Honey Pot and there are only two ways in and two ways out, front door (usually at least one cop there) and back door in the alley...
I just texted him to see what his thoughts are on the issue. Although I doubt he will respond to me today.
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: JimBielson
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: JimBielson
ill repeat myself, congress and the nra does not want stricter gun laws. they block obama. obama wants stricter gun laws on people on watch lists but he can't do it because conservatives wont let him. what exactly do you want him to do? convict people that havent done anything yet? put anyone in prison that looks shady?
No, I expect him to do his job with the tools he has. You further my suspicion by saying Obama's hands are tied. As many tools that he / they have, that we know about and many we dont this guy was free to slaughter. Just because someone says no, you cant have that does not mean you throw a tantrum and just let a massacre take place.
That is exactly what Obama did. He knew the target and he was warned about the terrorist that did the deed. That is all we need to know.
when you label him a terrorist before he does anything wrong is where you are mistaken. there's lots of people on the government watchlist, you're saying they should all be in prison for thought crime. thats the essence of fascism and it goes against american law and what we stand for. innocent until proven guilty. i dont expect for the president to imprison someone that hasnt broken any law. the fact that violence happens doesnt mean he fails as a president, that means the the terrorist fails at being a human. the blame is on the terrorist.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: vjr1113
Considering how many individuals are shot daily, and in the occasional mass shootings, the stance by our Presidential Administration and Congress is absolutely insane. Until scientists learn how to erase our violent side, guns should only be shipped to law enforcement and the military.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: DancedWithWolves
a reply to: JimBielson
This man was investigated twice, and cleared by the FBI twice with both investigations closed. If someone is willing to die to kill you, we can't make you "safe." Life comes with risks. Freedom comes with risks.
Enjoy each day you are alive with more tolerance and compassion and less blame and hate. That alone makes you safe. The rest, even eating bacon, is a roll of the dice.
Peace
He was NOT cleared by the bureau. He was interviewed twice and the results were inconclusive.
They are NOT the same thing when it comes to an investigation.
ok well thats your opinion. this was a mass shooting by a terrorist
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: vjr1113
a reply to: neo96
why cant' a mass shooting also be an act of terrorism?
Because TERRORIST use what ever is around them.
There's been 40 years of proof.
so a terrorist that shoots a mass group of people with a gun doesn't count as a mass shooting in your mind? that makes no sense
No it doesn't.
Not a mass shooting. A TERRORIST ATTACK.
There is a difference especially how LEO handles it, and the US government handles it.
I know why some are calling it a 'mass shooting' though.
Because it takes heat off the epic failure of the NSA and the surveillance state, and the EPIC failure of the administrations foreign policy.
And it creates OPPORTUNITY to push draconian LAWS.
ok well thats your opinion. this was a mass shooting by a terrorist. was this a terrorist attack? yes. was this carried out by a mass shooter? yes. the two are not exclusive from each other. it can be a terrorist mass shooting, because that's what happened.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: vjr1113
Considering how many individuals are shot daily, and in the occasional mass shootings, the stance by our Presidential Administration and Congress is absolutely insane. Until scientists learn how to erase our violent side, guns should only be shipped to law enforcement and the military.