It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The hate is spiraling out of control, small bomb detonated in Target bathroom

page: 6
18
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: Sargeras

And, you and other fearful men would be comfortable with a person that in all outward appearances was a woman, walking in and peeing in the urinal next to you? Because that would be the only way you would know what "parts" they have.



Fearful?

I prefer logical and pragmatic.




posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Ive actually seen that very thing. My best friend in preschool and early elementary school was a lesbian who wished she was a boy. She would wear boys underwear and pee standing up at the urinals like all the other bous. And it never bothered a single one of us. We laughed and thought it was funny cause she was trying to be like the boys. But we never thought it was even weird. Just a prerogative. Still have the mental inage though. She would have to lean way back to get a good arc, but nothing else was different. Had pretty good aim too.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sargeras

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: Sargeras

And, you and other fearful men would be comfortable with a person that in all outward appearances was a woman, walking in and peeing in the urinal next to you? Because that would be the only way you would know what "parts" they have.



Fearful?

I prefer logical and pragmatic.


Do you include the prpbability of odds in your pragmatism in this subject? Cause it seems very unlikely that a wpuld be rapist wpuld go through all the trouble, again sighting thatvtheres easier alternatives like simple abduction.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:30 AM
link   
The whole toilet based on how you identify at any given time only effects women. guys dont care all that much. guys dont really care if other women use the toilets (go to any nightclub and you will see plenty of women using mens restrooms when their line goes on forever..and men dont care at all).

So...whats the solution then?



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: BASSPLYR

originally posted by: Sargeras

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: Sargeras

And, you and other fearful men would be comfortable with a person that in all outward appearances was a woman, walking in and peeing in the urinal next to you? Because that would be the only way you would know what "parts" they have.



Fearful?

I prefer logical and pragmatic.


Do you include the prpbability of odds in your pragmatism in this subject? Cause it seems very unlikely that a wpuld be rapist wpuld go through all the trouble, again sighting thatvtheres easier alternatives like simple abduction.


Why do they have to be a rapist?

And not just a weirdo that likes to peep of women, or install cameras etc..

Too many strange fetishes to name most.

My strangest fetish is I enjoy drinking beer and typing on the internet.... It gets me into a lot if funny situations since my already "abrasive " personality loses all the filters.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: imod02
Inspite of what people are saying, my big worry is that a "safe" place for our children to have a pee is been removed all becouse of PC. All I want is a safe place for kids to have a pee without some pervert hidding behind this transgender BS been in the same place taking his dick out hoping for a BJ. For all the snowflakes out there I did say dick


Alarmist nonsense. Do you really think that restrooms are less safe now? They're no different than they've ever been.

If you want to stop perverts from preying on people in restrooms, you strengthen the existing penalties for those crimes, not penalize third parties that have done nothing wrong. Further, you claim that you fear for the safety of your kids. If it's that important to you, why aren't you getting up off your ass and escorting them in? You want to be lazy, but hold 3rd parties responsible if something goes wrong. Take responsibility for your own damn kids.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: SaturnFX
The whole toilet based on how you identify at any given time only effects women. guys dont care all that much. guys dont really care if other women use the toilets (go to any nightclub and you will see plenty of women using mens restrooms when their line goes on forever..and men dont care at all).

So...whats the solution then?


I agree, it doesn't matter to me personally, but I'm a guy, I don't mind letting the ladies admire my... Generous endowment, at least that's what they tell me after I cry.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: ReprobateRaccoon

originally posted by: imod02
Inspite of what people are saying, my big worry is that a "safe" place for our children to have a pee is been removed all becouse of PC. All I want is a safe place for kids to have a pee without some pervert hidding behind this transgender BS been in the same place taking his dick out hoping for a BJ. For all the snowflakes out there I did say dick


Alarmist nonsense. Do you really think that restrooms are less safe now? They're no different than they've ever been.

If you want to stop perverts from preying on people in restrooms, you strengthen the existing penalties for those crimes, not penalize third parties that have done nothing wrong. Further, you claim that you fear for the safety of your kids. If it's that important to you, why aren't you getting up off your ass and escorting them in? You want to be lazy, but hold 3rd parties responsible if something goes wrong. Take responsibility for your own damn kids.


So then tell me oh great and wise one, why did we long ago segregate restrooms by sex?



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 10:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: SaturnFX
The whole toilet based on how you identify at any given time only effects women. guys dont care all that much. guys dont really care if other women use the toilets (go to any nightclub and you will see plenty of women using mens restrooms when their line goes on forever..and men dont care at all).

So...whats the solution then?


And do you see men overlapping into the women's toilet? Or is that treading in rape territory?



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm
Rape, regardless of location or gender is still illegal. What does it matter, IMO, if a man goes into a restroom to use the facilities, washes, then leaves? If his BEHAVIOR in there is illegal, it should be reported. Otherwise, I see not issue her.e If it is "save the children" (typical fear mongering emotional argument) then why are parents allowing their children in the bathrooms unattended? If strict laws are put in place that demand that you "use the restroom that matches your anatomy", then a parent that has different anatomy form their child now MUST let the child go in there alone. That will increase their chances of all this fear of being assaulted....doesn't it? And a male child cannot legally enter a women's room with their mom then either.

People are mixing and confusing illegal BEHAVIOR with legal APPEARANCE.


edit on 6/10/2016 by Krakatoa because: mandela effect



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix

We have failed as a free society when we can't even recognize individual freedoms for people we don't agree with.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix

We have failed as a free society when we can't even recognize individual freedoms for people we don't agree with.


You can't call it a free society if such base level things as free speech don't exist.

America is the last place on earth that still has this.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 10:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sargeras

So then tell me oh great and wise one, why did we long ago segregate restrooms by sex?



Did I say men should be allowed to enter the ladies room?

No, MEN should not be allowed in the ladies room. Transgender people that are legally recognized in their new gender, however, do not fall into that category. I don't care what resides between the legs of someone in the locked adjoining stall if they're just there to pee.

What I object to is men who think that by virtue of having a wife or daughter, they're entitled to restrict ladies restroom access to anyone who doesn't look feminine enough. We've already seen cases of men chasing women out of restrooms based on looks. Police dragging women out of restrooms because they didn't look enough like women. Where do you draw the line? You want to pass new laws keeping transgender people out of restrooms. Let me ask you, how will you identify those transgender people? Will you arrange for your daughter to carry her birth certificate around with her? Kids are kids, and it's only a matter of time before she loses it, and sensitive ID information is lost. ID theft run rampant. No thank you. If you're not going to rely on birth certificates, what do you use to "verify" sex? Should we have security guards at every restroom, feeling up entrants via manual verification? Think TSA on crack and you'll realize the horror of such a system. Your solution there is worse than random perverts. It becomes the problem rather than the solution. No thanks.

I don't need any man gating access to the ladies room. It's not your space to regulate. If you want to restrict access to a space, feel free to set up a toll booth at the mens room and report on how receptive the public is to your ID demands. Maybe you can hang out at the urinals and "peek." Perhaps you can require that entrants fart the theme song from MacGuyver. I don't care, just keep it in YOUR space.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 11:07 AM
link   
Solution -

XX use the Ladies
XY use the Gentlemens

That was a tough one.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 11:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sargeras

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix

We have failed as a free society when we can't even recognize individual freedoms for people we don't agree with.


You can't call it a free society if such base level things as free speech don't exist.

America is the last place on earth that still has this.


We hardly have free speech any more either.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Can no longer call it FREE Speech...when people get 'Charged' for using it.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sargeras

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix

We have failed as a free society when we can't even recognize individual freedoms for people we don't agree with.


You can't call it a free society if such base level things as free speech don't exist.

America is the last place on earth that still has this.


We hardly have free speech any more either.


Thats hate speech!!!

It is tiring isn't it?



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: DBCowboy

Can no longer call it FREE Speech...when people get 'Charged' for using it.


EU Canada Australia... Cough cough



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   
I'll bet that now they regret naming their chain stores "Target" Seems like a dumb name for a place that is concerned about safety. A bit like naming your kid "Deadmeat" and sending him off to war.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 11:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: ReprobateRaccoon

originally posted by: Sargeras

So then tell me oh great and wise one, why did we long ago segregate restrooms by sex?



Did I say men should be allowed to enter the ladies room?

No, MEN should not be allowed in the ladies room. Transgender people that are legally recognized in their new gender, however, do not fall into that category. I don't care what resides between the legs of someone in the locked adjoining stall if they're just there to pee.

What I object to is men who think that by virtue of having a wife or daughter, they're entitled to restrict ladies restroom access to anyone who doesn't look feminine enough. We've already seen cases of men chasing women out of restrooms based on looks. Police dragging women out of restrooms because they didn't look enough like women. Where do you draw the line? You want to pass new laws keeping transgender people out of restrooms. Let me ask you, how will you identify those transgender people? Will you arrange for your daughter to carry her birth certificate around with her? Kids are kids, and it's only a matter of time before she loses it, and sensitive ID information is lost. ID theft run rampant. No thank you. If you're not going to rely on birth certificates, what do you use to "verify" sex? Should we have security guards at every restroom, feeling up entrants via manual verification? Think TSA on crack and you'll realize the horror of such a system. Your solution there is worse than random perverts. It becomes the problem rather than the solution. No thanks.

I don't need any man gating access to the ladies room. It's not your space to regulate. If you want to restrict access to a space, feel free to set up a toll booth at the mens room and report on how receptive the public is to your ID demands. Maybe you can hang out at the urinals and "peek." Perhaps you can require that entrants fart the theme song from MacGuyver. I don't care, just keep it in YOUR space.


You know, I like how you told me I want to pass laws etc..

Even though I want most laws on the books to be removed.




top topics



 
18
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join