It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While her speech today at the American Jewish Committee Global Forum included some vague criticism of ongoing Israeli settlement expansion, as usual that will have no impact on US policy, as National Security Adviser Susan Rice centered the speech on pledges of a record military aid package being agreed to soon. The aid package, which Rice reiterated would be the “single largest military assistance package – with any country – in American history,” is expected to be between $37.5 and $40 billion over the next decade, which Rice said proved increasing aid to Israel isn’t a partisan issue in the US, but “an enduring American interest.” The US had initially offered a $40 billion deal which required the Israeli government to promise not to lobby the US Congress for more money during the 10-year plan, but this was rejected by Netanyahu. Other offers, in the realm of $35 billion but without the restrictions, have similarly been spurned. Getting Israel to agree to accept the record package remains the focus on Obama’s side, while many are warning Netanyahu that waiting Obama out and trying to get more from his successor risks alienating many Democrats, particularly in Netanyahu’s deal comes from a Republican president. Initial reports suggested Netanyahu was looking for a deal in the realm of $45 billion, though much of the discussion is based around the assumption of always demanding at least a bit more than was offered, no matter how gaudy the package already is.
The US had initially offered a $40 billion deal which required the Israeli government to promise not to lobby the US Congress for more money during the 10-year plan, but this was rejected by Netanyahu
It makes you think who controls who, right?
The US had initially offered a $40 billion deal which required the Israeli government to promise not to lobby the US Congress for more money during the 10-year plan, but this was rejected by Netanyahu.
originally posted by: WombRaider69
a reply to: ElectricFeel
Yep that's the sad reality we have to face. Forever Israel's lapdog. It's pretty clear that Hilary is pro Israel, so that won't change when she's president. What is Trump's stance on the relation between Israel and the US?
The aid package, which Rice reiterated would be the “single largest military assistance package – with any country – in American history,” is expected to be between $37.5 and $40 billion over the next decade
For FY2016, the following legislation addresses U.S. foreign assistance to Israel:
• A draft House FY2016 Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related
Programs bill would provide Israel
$3.1 billion in FMF as requested.
• H.R. 1735, the House version of the National Defense Authorization bill for
FY2016, authorizes up to $371.2 million for various U.S.-Israeli joint missile
defense systems including: $41.4 million for Iron Dome, $249.8 million for
David’s Sling; $34.5 million for Arrow 3, and $45.5 million for Arrow 2.
• S. 1376, the Senate version of the National Defense Authorization bill for
FY2016, authorizes up to $372.4 million for various U.S.-Israeli joint missile
defense systems.
• A draft House FY2016 Defense Appropri
ations bill would provide $487.595
million for U.S.-Israeli joint missile defense programs, of which $55 million is
for Iron Dome, $286.526 million is for David’s Sling, $89.550 million is for
Arrow 3, and $56.519 million is for Arrow 2.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Warpigs are destroying the planet, $40 Billion is far better spent on the domestic front on the homeless situation, infrastructre, job creation and healthcare.
America simply cannot afford to keep doing this - both fiscally and geopolitically it is a policy that is contributing to Americas economic and security woes.