It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WH Denies Endorsement Will Intimidate FBI Investigators
3:25PM THE PRESIDENT meets with Attorney General Lynch Oval Office Closed Press The topic of Obama's closed door meeting with Lynch has not been made public. Earnest made the statement in response to questioning from Fox News' James Rosen.
Clinton's comment "that it is not going to happen" comes at the very end right around the 8:10 mark. But the rest of video just shows what a liar she is and as other pundits have noted, during this same interview, she stumbled badly in answering Baier's question about her and her whole team refusing to cooperate with the SOS IG investigation.
originally posted by: ware2010
a reply to: thenightisours
its total BS, she should be indicted and never able to be our president, I cant stand that arrogant hag!!
it makes me mad seeing people get away with something just because of who they are.... what a joke.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: thenightisours
I think no indictment t. But I think it's because she didn't commit any crimes.
I stand with her.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
I think the FBI knows what it is doing
originally posted by: [post=20832105]Sillyolme
a reply to: Sillyolme
I know you believe this and will stick with her SILLY, and I respect that. But, if you just look at the facts that we do know about, which are quite bit, but only the tip of the iceberg. there is overwhelming evidence she committed not only mistakes, but real crimes. If you read the IG report, you will see a scathing and direct rebute to everything HRC has stated on this matter.
Washington Post article on IG report on Clinton emails
Peace!!
originally posted by: thenightisours
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: thenightisours
I think no indictment t. But I think it's because she didn't commit any crimes.
I stand with her.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
I think the FBI knows what it is doing
originally posted by: [post=20832105]Sillyolme
a reply to: Sillyolme
I know you believe this and will stick with her SILLY, and I respect that. But, if you just look at the facts that we do know about, which are quite bit, but only the tip of the iceberg. there is overwhelming evidence she committed not only mistakes, but real crimes. If you read the IG report, you will see a scathing and direct rebute to everything HRC has stated on this matter.
Washington Post article on IG report on Clinton emails
Peace!!
originally posted by: Sillyolme
originally posted by: thenightisours
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: thenightisours
I think no indictment t. But I think it's because she didn't commit any crimes.
I stand with her.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
I think the FBI knows what it is doing
originally posted by: [post=20832105]Sillyolme
a reply to: Sillyolme
I know you believe this and will stick with her SILLY, and I respect that. But, if you just look at the facts that we do know about, which are quite bit, but only the tip of the iceberg. there is overwhelming evidence she committed not only mistakes, but real crimes. If you read the IG report, you will see a scathing and direct rebute to everything HRC has stated on this matter.
Washington Post article on IG report on Clinton emails
Peace!!
I actually downloaded and read the report from the govt website where the 35page PDF is available.
It didn't say more than what she has already apologized for. It was against policy but not against the law.
The question is was states secrets ever at risk. And what the FBI needs to determine.
IG 83 Page Report on Clinton Secretary of State emails
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
This whole email thingnis stupid.
It doesnt matter.
Its not a big deal. Its not like she was selling secrets, or performing treason, or murdering, or laudering, or embezzling.
So she broke a stupid rule about where her emails are stored. So what?
I work for a fortune 100 company and we have a million different guidelines and rules for everything, and yet ppl do what they do all the time, and its no big deal.
Plus, do you think Hillary.. a nearly 70 year old lawyer, knows how to set up a private email server and knows the ins and outs of network security and network engineering?
No, its probably something one of her ylung advisors recommended not knowing it was breakjng any rules, and she said sure go ahead.
To be honest, the person who would really be at fault is whomever allowed her email domain to forward to her server, that person is reapinsible. Not her.. im sure she has no idea abot any of the technicalities of any of it.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
This whole email thingnis stupid.
It doesnt matter.
Its not a big deal. Its not like she was selling secrets, or performing treason, or murdering, or laudering, or embezzling.
So she broke a stupid rule about where her emails are stored. So what?
I work for a fortune 100 company and we have a million different guidelines and rules for everything, and yet ppl do what they do all the time, and its no big deal.
Plus, do you think Hillary.. a nearly 70 year old lawyer, knows how to set up a private email server and knows the ins and outs of network security and network engineering?
No, its probably something one of her ylung advisors recommended not knowing it was breakjng any rules, and she said sure go ahead.
To be honest, the person who would really be at fault is whomever allowed her email domain to forward to her server, that person is reapinsible. Not her.. im sure she has no idea abot any of the technicalities of any of it.
And that my friend is exactly what you have been conditioned to believe.
You see it does matter. Were not talking about your companies latest ideas or what Susie and Jimmy are doing on their lunchbreaks.
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
This whole email thingnis stupid.
It doesnt matter.
I work for a fortune 100 company and we have a million different guidelines and rules for everything, and yet ppl do what they do all the time, and its no big deal.
Plus, do you think Hillary.. a nearly 70 year old lawyer, knows how to set up a private email server and knows the ins and outs of network security and network engineering?
No, its probably something one of her ylung advisors recommended not knowing it was breakjng any rules, and she said sure go ahead.
Not her.. im sure she has no idea abot any of the technicalities of any of it.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ware2010
I think the FBI knows what it's doing.