It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Media silent on global gun control meeting taking place at the UN.

page: 1
21

log in

join
share:
+1 more 
posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 01:00 PM
link   

Global Gun Control Advocates to Meet in NYC to Set UN Disarmament Agenda.

Sixth Biennial Meeting of States on the Programme of Action.


Anti-gun globalists will meet in New York City this week discuss ways to confiscate small arms and ammunition from civilians and to consolidate monopoly control over those weapons in the hands of the governments of United Nations (UN) member states.

The convention is part of a UN-controlled process of disarmament called the Programme of Action (PoA).

From June 6-10 delegates from around the world will attend the Sixth Biennial Meeting of States (BMS6) of the PoA.

This latest planning meeting will give delegates an opportunity to move the ball closer to the goal of ridding the world's civilian population of the small arms and ammunition that could challenge the ability of UN-approved governments to carry out the will of the world body.

Why is this a global initiative?

Arent sovereign nations the ones in the best position to decide whats best for their own countries?

IMHO, the globalists really thought that theyd be able to push thru a lot more agenda items due to Obama's perceived popularity.

They were terribly wrong.

But he did get the healthcare mandate passed and officially turned the US into a war zone via the NDAA, where citizens no longer have Constitutionally protected rights.

Fortunately, they werent able to take away the guns.

I know a lot of people argue that the agenda has never been about "gun confiscations", just "common sense" regulation.

Law makers would disagree with you.




posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   
It's like I say with generally every thread focused on something that the UN is doing: Who cares.

We live under the Constitution, not UN policies. They can want to do whatever, but it doesn't mean that it will happen here in America.

The UN is a waste of time and money, and I wish that they would move it off-shore to a different country.



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 01:25 PM
link   
a reply to: SlapMonkey

They are actively involved with the lawmakers who try and chip away at our second amendment, I would say that constitutes a legitimate threat. Only one day left, and the half of them will probably fly off to Dresden for the Bilderberg 2016 meeting going on now.

Let us pray for more failures on their part.



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 01:53 PM
link   
Let them do what they want, the American people will not be down for confiscation. Maybe in the cities but definitely not anywhere else....they will run out of cops before we run out of bullets.



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   
Our alien overlords must be allergic to hot lead at 2,000 fps.



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: NightFlight

I believe that is a universal allergy lol! Sometimes it is the only medicine we have against authoritarians though



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

It doesn't matter how many laws Washington criminals pass against gun control, they will never get our guns. Never.



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 03:19 PM
link   
This is why the UN needs to go bye bye. They have outlived their purpose. kill the UN snake.



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 03:26 PM
link   
How quaint

UN mandate or US Constitutional right?


It's a no brainer.

In other News....



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Even should the unlikely happen--a UN treaty or some such is passed, and the President agrees with it...

It still has to be ratified by the Senate...and pass Constitutional muster...not to mention the voters responses.

Good luck with that!

The UN is powerless without the support of the US. Much as people hate that idea, it's plain unfettered truth. Nothing like this is going to get past the Security Council veto that the US holds.

Much more worrisome would be a measure in Congress that might approach having enough votes to get out of committee and onto the floor, and into the hands of the President. You know, those "reasonable" laws that so many harp on about.



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere
more people will die trying to take our boomsticks then just letting us keep em for our freedom and beliefs, if you really believe giving up your firearm will make the world safer, you sir, have no brain.





posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Isn't this the thing where its basically about export and importing guns and ammo? so an american wanting to buy an american gun will have zero changes and those who love to import different stuff might have an extra delay or two but one the average firearm dealer knows what boxes need ticking i'd doubt any US citizen would notice much difference



posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

For this country, the plan now is to arm all the alphabet agencies, and import troops from elsewhere, since they failed to take our guns.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 03:24 AM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

You know what's interesting...the fact that the UN meeting is about the illegal small arms trade worldwide. And this meeting has been going on since 2001.

This has nothing to do with legally bought guns, or them wanting to take your legally bought guns.

They had the same meeting in 2014 which you can read about here...

www.un-arm.org...

I guess actual research was too hard when you can just complain saying they are trying to take our guns.

Again it has to do with illegal trading of small arms not taking your legal guns away.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Sure its about illegal guns,but certain guns are legal here are illegal elsewhere correct? SO technically this could be skewed to actually impose a confiscation to please the countries where the US arms are illegal.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 01:45 PM
link   
Dont take me away



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 04:34 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Its all about the dodgy illegal trade not you walking down to wally mart and slapping a dozen guns and a trailer full of ammo in your trolley which is all perfectly legal.

Its illegal to have a pig in Israel (iirc) but theres nothing stopping anyone else outside of Israel having a bacon butty is there due to it being illegal there?

and if we went with a lot of the Roman based legal systems where it needs to be declared legal before its ok you'd be shafted as i do remember there was a thing where in Italy the internet was illegal as it hadn't been approved and thats why the British empire and later the US did so well as we work the other way around in that everything is legal unless ruled illegal.



posted on Jun, 10 2016 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa




Sure its about illegal guns,but certain guns are legal here are illegal elsewhere correct?


This is a meeting to try and curb things like this...





And many more like these are what they are discussing...they care less about your legal guns.



SO technically this could be skewed to actually impose a confiscation to please the countries where the US arms are illegal.


Where are American arms illegal, because those selling them are doing it illegally which is what the meeting is about.

In fact here you go... explained

www.poa-iss.org...



new topics

top topics



 
21

log in

join