It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
In an interview with FoxNews, In an interview with FoxNews, Hillary said she can't remember signing a non-disclosure-agreement when she was secretary of State !!!
GASP !!!
We have actually seen the document(s) posted on ATS.
My God.
This is really getting good.
Ignorantia juris non excusat[1] or ignorantia legis neminem excusat[2] (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"[1] and "ignorance of law excuses no one"[2] respectively) is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because he or she was unaware of its content.
source: en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
I don't understand the super high level of scrutiny on Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
I don't understand the super high level of scrutiny on Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
I don't understand the super high level of scrutiny on Hillary Clinton. NOTHING new has come out about her "scandals" that fox news has been playing on repeat for the last 8 years. Just rehashed stories over and over. While there is very little scrutiny on Trump, who isn't really conservative. He could've ran as a democrat but it would've been way harder.
Years and years of pushing all sorts of non-scandals on Hillary Clinton because she was going to be the future nominee has convinced a bunch of ppl that she is "crooked Hillary". Whether she is a corrupt politician or not isn't for me to say. It's for the men and women of the courts to eventually decide. Problem with that is the "eventually". American justice system is slow, fox news wasn't gonna wait. So they convinced you all beforehand. Maybe I trust democracy, news media and the justice system too much. But someone who entered the presidential race with years of governing experience and the confidence to know she will be president versus a man who entered the race as a business man looking for free exposure and who is equally surprised with the rest of the world that he is still running for president. You should pick the person who has always had the confidence to become president. Not someone who never actually thought he would be president. Or vote libertarian, what's his name seems like a decent guy lol.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Her resume speaks volumes.
Her stamina in the face of rhetoric like this thread says even more.
If they've bilked millions from the American people why don't they just say screw you and retire?. Why do they just keep working and putting themselves out there for ridicule?
Why put up with the constant attacks? Winter in Miami is a lot nicer than winter in DC but they stay. They work. Both are over retirement age but they just keep on working. Certainly not for fame and glory because they get little of that.
They work because they care.