It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain
That's the ticket through, essentially you are asking "are we greater than the sum of our parts"?
Humanity probobly shares some from of group consciousness, but that does not mean we cannot utilize technologies to access such a concept. Even if it does raise some ethical conundrums as to us interrupting what some would consider to be the natural process of life.
originally posted by: andy06shake
In the grand scheme of thing we probobly just not that important.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain
"What you are actually is beyond words."
Oh i don't know about that, i can think of quite a few choice words that describes our current iteration of existence.
What we actually are seems to be a collection of biological information that thinks its sentient and/or in the possession of freewill. Which is a tenuous concept at best and probably an illusion.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain
What do you think about the concept of Synchronicity, which holds that events are nothing more than meaningful coincidences. How do you think, or do you think, that synchronicity plays its part with regards to the Human condition?
originally posted by: andy06shake
Without meaning or meaningful answers to the questions we pose as a species Humanity is doomed to repeat her mistakes time and time again which is clearly illustrated by history.
Scientists who study the microbiome, the collection of microorganisms that live in and on the human body, have peppered research papers with an estimate that bacteria outnumber human cells 10-to-1 or even 100-to-1. In recent years, those estimates have come into question, with the American Academy of Microbiology suggesting in 2013 that the real figure is probably closer to three bacterial cells for each human cell.
life is meaningless. Life does not need meaning to be.
Has it ever been considered that 'thought' maybe the issue
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: andy06shake
In the grand scheme of thing we probobly just not that important.
What you are actually is beyond words, but it would be not untrue to say you are nothing whatsoever other than pure, infinite, disembodied consciousness/intelligence; a field of miraculous infinite light; God dreaming itself; an infinite point of pure potential; or the infinite implications of nothing whatsoever.
The immediate presentation of this unspeakable actuality is the field of your experience, which is an instantaneously appearing virtual field of Radiant Presence as apparent qualities. This is the actuality of which every/ and any/ thing that you think exists consists. This is inclusive and complete; nothing whatever other than this field exists. In short, the entirety of Reality is the "bubble" of YOUR experience, the field of Radiant Presence, which alone exists.
This is the totality of Reality. This is not theoretical, but is actually, immediately real; always the case right here right now. theopendoorway.org...
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
Does Love ever "appear" or "arise" in your field of perception?
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Has it ever been considered that 'thought' maybe the issue
Going by that logic you type on ATS without thinking?