It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But bu but. Regardless of how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
originally posted by: ssenerawa
But bu but. Doesent how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
Elaborate?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
But bu but. Doesent how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
Doesn't a societal reset mean...a reset?
originally posted by: ssenerawa
I suggest you lay off MSM it's merely propaganda, and to do you're own research.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
Absolutely not, just read the news.
originally posted by: ssenerawa
Elaborate?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
But bu but. Doesent how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
Doesn't a societal reset mean...a reset?
Regardless of how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
Luck really? The resources are available, your sadly mistaken. We're also very easy to eradicate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
Our technology would not be responsible for our survival through. The resources are not available, say the ice age lasted 10,000 years, what are we going to do, stay in the DUMBS for all that time?
Humanity would survive down to dumb luck and the fact that we are rather hard to eradicate.
I don't understand what you're trying to say.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
Elaborate?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
But bu but. Doesent how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
Doesn't a societal reset mean...a reset?
Regardless of how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
Your words, quoted.
The thread is about intelligence, do I really need to spell it out?
originally posted by: ssenerawa
I don't understand what you're trying to say.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
Elaborate?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
But bu but. Doesent how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
Doesn't a societal reset mean...a reset?
Regardless of how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
Your words, quoted.
The thread is about intelligence, do I really need to spell it out?
Didn't say you're an MSM drone, I stated that you should lay MSM a bit. There all you see is the world blowing up and coming to an end
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
I don't understand what you're trying to say.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
Elaborate?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
But bu but. Doesent how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
Doesn't a societal reset mean...a reset?
Regardless of how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
Your words, quoted.
The thread is about intelligence, do I really need to spell it out?
Wow...
Ok then, the thread is about intelligence, I said we were clearly not intelligent, just look at the news. You responded that I was an MSM drone or whatever, You also talked about society reinitiating from an ice age. I said a reset is a reset, intelligence per se is lost.
WTF?
Didn't say you're an MSM drone, I stated that you should lay MSM a bit. There all you see is the world blowing up and coming to an end
but when I step outside I you see kids playing, birds are still singing, the sky is still blue and the grass is still green. Then I say hello to the mail man.
Also intelligence has nothing to do with compassion and/or the way people behave.
It's proven psychopath are smarter than nosy religious folk and/or average joes. And we all know they're not the nicest people.
Why wouldn't I?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: ssenerawa
Didn't say you're an MSM drone, I stated that you should lay MSM a bit. There all you see is the world blowing up and coming to an end
The implication was there, for sure.
but when I step outside I you see kids playing, birds are still singing, the sky is still blue and the grass is still green. Then I say hello to the mail man.
I am 47 years old. I have lived in more than one country and my son is 12 and not English, although I am. You have absolutely no idea who you are talking to.
Also intelligence has nothing to do with compassion and/or the way people behave.
I have no clue why you would say this.
It's proven psychopath are smarter than nosy religious folk and/or average joes. And we all know they're not the nicest people.
Once again, I have no idea why you are saying this in the context of the conversation.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: ssenerawa
Didn't say you're an MSM drone, I stated that you should lay MSM a bit. There all you see is the world blowing up and coming to an end
The implication was there, for sure.
but when I step outside I you see kids playing, birds are still singing, the sky is still blue and the grass is still green. Then I say hello to the mail man.
I am 47 years old. I have lived in more than one country and my son is 12 and not English, although I am. You have absolutely no idea who you are talking to.
Also intelligence has nothing to do with compassion and/or the way people behave.
I have no clue why you would say this. I corrected some of the grammar.
It's proven psychopath are smarter than nosy religious folk and/or average joes. And we all know they're not the nicest people.
Once again, I have no idea why you are saying this in the context of the conversation.
They could play 24hr of videos that restore your faith in humanity. Like that uber driver who just recently returned $3,000 cash with his wallet and legal immigration documents from Ukraine.abc11.com... MSM chooses to air that crap, fear is what keeps the profits rolling uphill.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
I don't understand what you're trying to say.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
Elaborate?
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: ssenerawa
But bu but. Doesent how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ssenerawa
If there was another significant Ice age, which there will be relatively soon our current technology could not save the majority of humanity.
Doesn't a societal reset mean...a reset?
Regardless of how many won't survive it, the species will continue to flourish and re-populate.
Your words, quoted.
The thread is about intelligence, do I really need to spell it out?
Wow...
Ok then, the thread is about intelligence, I said we were clearly not intelligent, just look at the news. You responded that I was an MSM drone or whatever, You also talked about society reinitiating from an ice age. I said a reset is a reset, intelligence per se is lost.
WTF?