It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The FInal Captsone- Revelation of The Devil Her Name is Alice Part 3

page: 10
15
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
You should worry, thousands of them are in your computer, RIGHT now.


They cannot get into the NSA mainframe. Plus I just had my pals at DIA retask a satellite.

Now, to the topic. You find that quote yet or are you willing to admit it does not exist?




posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:28 PM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

I think that post is called "BS from an internet wannabe".



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

If I give you the quote, will you stop or will you continue this charade?



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
If I give you the quote, will you stop or will you continue this charade?


Most certainly.

This should be fun.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

If I give you the quote,


You already gave the fake quote....

My invisible pink unicorns have just kicked the crap out of the mouse people, so they will not be coming here at all!



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:32 PM
link   

Public Service Announcement!!!



Go After the Ball, Not the Player!



Quit bickering!!!!!!!!!!!!!



and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:32 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
If I give you the quote, will you stop or will you continue this charade?


Most certainly.

This should be fun.


I cannot believe I caved in. But this is the last thing I do here. I'm just tired.

I was wrong on ONE thing. The quote is not from Morals & Dogma. It is from la femme et l'enfant Page 588



However, i want to point out where you were wrong. Remember when you said to "read the paragraph above"?

Your quote (Just to get it right and not put words in your mouth. Unlike some people, I don't like puting words in peoples mouths when they said no such thing)

Quote from Augustus:



What you need to do now is read the paragraph before this one where Pike makes it clear he thinks only jackasses believe in Lucifer.


I see no such paragraph. Do you?

edit on th2016000000Mondayth000000Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:53:33 -0500fAmerica/ChicagoMon, 06 Jun 2016 18:53:33 -0500 by SoulSurfer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

With that said, I take my leave. have a good day.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Um, SoulSurfer?

You do know that that book wasn't written by Albert Pike?



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
I was wrong on ONE thing. The quote is not from Morals & Dogma. It is from la femme et l'enfant Page 588


Yeah, and the one thing you were wrong on was that this is the Taxil Hoax.


I see no such paragraph. Do you?


Sorry, wrong page, 102 in various copies:


...thence came the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the
Ancient Serpent, and the Light-bearer or Phosphor, of which the
poets have made the false Lucifer of the legend. "


'False Lucifer of legend'.

Pike did not believe in Lucifer.

Thank you for playing.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I just want to say ONE thing. For once, I am actually glad you tried to debunk me. because you put my attention towards the following paragraph.



Albert Pike proves Jonathan (The man I pointed to in the Original OP) to be Correct. Which means, he is NOT a hoax.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
Albert Pike proves Jonathan (The man I pointed to in the Original OP) to be Correct. Which means, he is NOT a hoax.


To be honest I could not care about Johnny, I was only interested in pointing out that the Taxil Hoax was quoted.

Masonic Agenda and all that. Glad you found something useful for yourself.




edit on 6-6-2016 by AugustusMasonicus because: Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
Albert Pike proves Jonathan (The man I pointed to in the Original OP) to be Correct. Which means, he is NOT a hoax.


To be honest I could not care about Johnny, I was only interested in pointing out that the Taxil Hoax was quoted.

Masonic Agenda and all that.


Whether you care about him or not. I thank you for proving him correct.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

That would be called "confirmation bias".

Just because one discredited person agrees with another discredited person, doesn't make either more credible and the stories any truer.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Now you're just flip floping. Yea I have no time for this. I spoke what I needed. And Augustus ended up proving that Jonathan was correct in his videos in the OP.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
I thank you for proving him correct.


I proved him correct by proving you wrong? That is some space continuum destroying logic there.

But if it makes you happy, have at it.




edit on 6-6-2016 by AugustusMasonicus because: networkdude has no beer but at least he is not a religious nutter



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: TerryDon79

Now you're just flip floping. Yea I have no time for this. I spoke what I needed. And Augustus ended up proving that Jonathan was correct in his videos in the OP.


Actually, he didn't.

It was proven that 2 people have the same opinions. 2 equal opinions does not a truth make.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:09 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

He did, he pointed towards the paragraph. That is in a sense, proving Jonathan is correct.
.

Funny how this went from defending Albert pike to all of a sudden saying "pike is discredited.".



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: TerryDon79

He did, he pointed towards the paragraph. That is in a sense, proving Jonathan is correct.
.
Again, just because 2 people agree, doesn't make it fact.


Funny how this went from defending Albert pike to all of a sudden saying "pike is discredited.".
Who was defending Albert Pike? He was a liar and wrote a lot of untruths. It was about you misquoting what he had said. There's a big difference.

BTW, you should seriously look at the Taxil Hoax. It will show just how wrong you really are.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join