It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anti-Trump Rioters chant "Make California Mexico Again!”, beat up Trump supporters

page: 8
53
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 09:39 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

Yet the media will call Trump a racist for stating, factually, that these sorts of people are a threat to our nation! He should start having video made, and releasing clips of the violence in tv ads.




posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: syrinx high priest

Exactly. What was he thinking when he decided to hold a rally in mostly democrat mostly Latino San Jose?




So......holding a rally in a mostly Democratic place means one should expect violence?

That says a lot......



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

Wrong. It'd be just as confusing as it is now.

What is your obsession with blaming people who have opposite political ideologies to yours? Having different ideas isn't correlated with violent and idiotic behavior. Some people are just ignorant and foolish regardless of how they think. Stop bunching people up in a group and pointing your finger. We're suppose to be past this.
edit on 4-6-2016 by BrokedownChevy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
a reply to: carewemust

Because being anti Trump doesn't imply being pro Hillary or pro Sanders. Most Americans don't vote so maybe many of these anti Trump protesters are simply trouble makers who aren't interested in anything except getting into fights. I find that the world is full of these types of people. Stop intentionally creating divisions between Americans. It's old.


Many of the protestors/rioters are legal, and will vote. The news media must be too scared and intimidated to ask them who they're voting for.

Or, maybe they do ask, but don't like what they're hearing. The major networks wouldn't say that these are Clinton or Sanders followers, if this were the case.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Or maybe none of that is true, which it likely isn't.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 10:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheBulk
a reply to: Gryphon66

Feel free to start a thread about all the rioting Trump supporters are doing.


You know what i am starting to suspect? That the media is waiting for this. Until that time they will label reports of the SJW liberals as

"Trump supporters and protesters clash"

But the moment their victims decide that enough is enough and they are forced to come prepared and seriously (And finally) start to fight back. The planned media war machine will kick in and the report will be labeled:

"Trump supporters attack the peaceful left protestors, leftist protestors act in self defense"

If and when this happens the game is on imo. And i mean really on. There will be war in the streets but the right wont be taking it sitting down anymore like they have so far , credits to them for that btw for trying so hard for so long but there will be a limit reached. Critical mass inc.


edit on America/ChicagovAmerica/ChicagoSat, 04 Jun 2016 22:07:23 -05001620166America/Chicago by everyone because: typos



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

Yes, the Democrats are a distinct group.

One might even argue that "liberals" share basic similarities, although that's much more vague.

However, the spurious, absurd claim that Democrats and liberals support political violence is not merely vague, it's ludicrous.

Forty-five million or so Americans are registered Democrats. About 31% identify as Democrats, depending on the poll.

Let's round it off to 50 million or so American Democrats for this exercise.

You're making the claim that 50 million people all agree with the violent actions by Trump protesters in San Jose.

Let that sink in.

Is that what you want to claim?

Because if it is, and you don't see the absolute utter absurdity of such a claim, we're done.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 10:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
a reply to: carewemust

Because being anti Trump doesn't imply being pro Hillary or pro Sanders. Most Americans don't vote so maybe many of these anti Trump protesters are simply trouble makers who aren't interested in anything except getting into fights. I find that the world is full of these types of people. Stop intentionally creating divisions between Americans. It's old.


Many of the protestors/rioters are legal, and will vote. The news media must be too scared and intimidated to ask them who they're voting for.

Or, maybe they do ask, but don't like what they're hearing. The major networks wouldn't say that these are Clinton or Sanders followers, if this were the case.



Except that Sanders and Clinton have both condemned the violence in San Jose.

Donald J. Trump remains the only Presidential candidate that has supported political violence in this election.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 10:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Gryphon66

What if I started a movement called, "The white race"...

How would you feel about that?


It's your right. What does your group stand for?

That would determine what I think about it.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 10:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
a reply to: carewemust

Because being anti Trump doesn't imply being pro Hillary or pro Sanders. Most Americans don't vote so maybe many of these anti Trump protesters are simply trouble makers who aren't interested in anything except getting into fights. I find that the world is full of these types of people. Stop intentionally creating divisions between Americans. It's old.


Many of the protestors/rioters are legal, and will vote. The news media must be too scared and intimidated to ask them who they're voting for.

Or, maybe they do ask, but don't like what they're hearing. The major networks wouldn't say that these are Clinton or Sanders followers, if this were the case.



Except that Sanders and Clinton have both condemned the violence in San Jose.

Donald J. Trump remains the only Presidential candidate that has supported political violence in this election.


ThATS simply not true suggest you use Google. Condemning the violence but then stating he deserves it isn't really the same thing. Either you oppose it or you don't. Many in this thread have the same misguided logic. Either you support people being attacked for there beliefs or you dont. There is no middle ground and no Trump didn't cause it nor deserves it. In a civil society you don't like someone's political view you present an alternative. Claiming he's alternative racist or a nazi does nothing show his ideas to be wrong or outdated.

To have a political debate you show how your view is better what's the advantage of allowing illegals into the country? Why we shouldn't secure the border. And show us that he's wrong about crime drugs and gangs following these illegal immigrants. Though I'm sure Texans would disagree with you.

edit on 6/4/16 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 11:01 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

They can't and thats why they are freaking out.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 11:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: TheBulk



However, the spurious, absurd claim that Democrats and liberals support political violence is not merely vague, it's ludicrous.



Why is that so ludicrous? We see you here doing your best to turn a blind eye to it don't we? It took several people here about 6 pages to make you see the left's violence in one of the OP's video's. If anything i think you are a prime example of a very large part of the problem that is being discussed.



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 12:00 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 12:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
Condemning the violence but then stating he deserves it isn't really the same thing.

No, it isn't which make me wonder about the rest of your post.


Either you oppose it or you don't. Many in this thread have the same misguided logic. Either you support people being attacked for there beliefs or you dont. There is no middle ground and no Trump didn't cause it nor deserves it.

Actually he did. Even if what he said was true some people might take offense and that is the cause.


In a civil society you don't like someone's political view you present an alternative.

Guess things are not as civil as you believed.


To have a political debate you show how your view is better

Who said it was a political debate?



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 01:12 AM
link   
Don't let the momentum die.



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 01:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheBulk
This is getting ridiculous. We have racist, nationalistic Mexican mobs targeting white people for beatings and humiliation while openly supporting the take over of this country and the media is IGNORING IT. None of this stuff makes the national news and definitely doesn't stir up the outrage it should be. These people don't like this country and they definitely don't like white people. We have all this spin about things Trump has said and claims they're racist, while we have real racism happening on video everyday with out a peep from the usual suspects. I'm tired of it.





Police Officer Assaulted, Punches Thrown After San Jose Trump Rally (video at link)




I bet the people who took over a big chunk of Mexico through ilegal means back then didn't like mexican people, were racist, beat and humiliated brown people and openly supported the take over of another's country land, they didn't like the country named Mexico but they stole their land and they definitely didn't like dark colored people.

What goes around, comes around. Meh



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 01:17 AM
link   
a reply to: WarriorMH


Come and take it



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 01:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: WarriorMH


Come and take it


Lame. I don't care about any of that but its very clear to me that mexican people do. Also they already have dummy you just don't realize it yet.



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 01:18 AM
link   
Trump obviously didn't "make" anyone go out and do anything. But it's obvious that someone vying for a position like POTUS is going to raise levels of concern, hate, anger, etc.. if they make contentious comments. And Trump is the master at this. From snippy rude comments on Twitter made to enrage, anger, and throw opponents off, to ridiculous comments to the media on a regular basis, Trump is the impetus for these sorts of uprisings. You are going to blame Americans for this? When has a mere candidate raised this level of hate and ire in the past? And you are suggesting it is NOT Trump causing it?

He has angered not just Americans, but seems to anger allies around the world, and sadly, is gaining the support of dictators and tyrants. And this doesn't concern you? Russia and North Korea are highly supportive Trump. Our allies are worried about him. But obviously he is so flipping brilliant that this is people overreacting? Please..

The dude is a menace, and I'm still floored people don't see the levels of strife, anger, hate, and contention he will cause if he takes office. He is a buffoon - a reality star, womanizing, racist tendencies bully who lies with such regularity that alone should frighten everyone. Part of the 1% that everyone laughably hated until he ran for office, he is not in ANY way in touch with the ACTUAL American people. How could he be?

If he takes office, woe to the U.S.A. - he will ridicule and create hate with allies, embolden enemies, and will realize his real estate tricks aren't quite the answer to the things like the deficit, and our economy. He has no plans.. he makes ludicrous comments he can't back up with solid ideas. His "solution" to make Mexico pay for the wall was laughable, once revealed.

But again.. people are easily fooled, and mistake braggadocio, ego, and bullying as "having a plan" and "having balls." He is "different", sure. Why people assume this is automatically a good thing confuses me.

edit on 5-6-2016 by fleabit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 01:18 AM
link   
a reply to: WarriorMH

No seriously, let them have California.


Lets watch that one play out.
edit on 5-6-2016 by Lysergic because: (no reason given)



new topics




 
53
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join