It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: BrokedownChevy
Why? It is the perfect example of one group demanding another group be forced to accept them instead of making equal accommodations for them.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: BrokedownChevy
Why? It is the perfect example of one group demanding another group be forced to accept them instead of making equal accommodations for them. You just watch...the transgendered don't want their own bathroom and therefore...equality. They want to force others to accept them into theirs. Sorry...acceptance is not a right and not being willing to accept someone isn't a crime.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: BrokedownChevy
Why? It is the perfect example of one group demanding another group be forced to accept them instead of making equal accommodations for them.
Again with the "Separate, but Equal". It's been done, unsuccessfully. It's discrimination.
The only group forcing the issue via lawsuits is - - the Religious Right.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: BrokedownChevy
Why? It is the perfect example of one group demanding another group be forced to accept them instead of making equal accommodations for them.
Again with the "Separate, but Equal". It's been done, unsuccessfully. It's discrimination.
The only group forcing the issue via lawsuits is - - the Religious Right.
originally posted by: LordDraconia
Does that 45 year old man have the right to flash his hairy wrinkly old man balls at 6 year olds? Because if you say yes, you are putting his right to be disturbing over the kids right not to have to see that. That is putting something on a pedestal.
]
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: LordDraconia
Does that 45 year old man have the right to flash his hairy wrinkly old man balls at 6 year olds? Because if you say yes, you are putting his right to be disturbing over the kids right not to have to see that. That is putting something on a pedestal.
]
I'd need to research myself to find out all the facts. Something I normally do on any story.
But, from this story, no I do not agree with the decision.
I personally think America is way too puritan about the naked body. I don't have an issue with body parts.
But, in this case - - - it seems too intentional, extremist, and its flat out rude. I wouldn't support a woman flaunting herself on display either.
Manners and Decorum.
originally posted by: LordDraconia
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: gladtobehere
This is the new world and these girls are going to have to learn to live in it.
No mention of any frightening behaviors or gestures, they were only frightened of the appearance.
The mother didn't know how to handle it? How about telling the truth? Children are vastly more adaptable than we give them credit for. And if they are terrified? It's because the mother is.
Translation: SCREW THE CHILDREN! They better learn to live with our demands or we will come down on them like a hammer, call them homophones, bigot or whatever we must. And you...the bitch calling yourself a "Mother"...you better start backing us up whether you agree with our views or not. You and your views, opinions and even your rights don't matter. Only WE are important and WE demand special treatment no matter who it hurts. Yes...no matter who it hurts.
I knew that any grown ups that disagreed with them didn't have any rights of freedoms. But how they can put transgenders on a pedestal over our children, our very future? I don't get it. Does not sound like what Dawkins called an, "Evolutionary Stable Survival Strategy" I believe.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: LordDraconia
Does that 45 year old man have the right to flash his hairy wrinkly old man balls at 6 year olds? Because if you say yes, you are putting his right to be disturbing over the kids right not to have to see that. That is putting something on a pedestal.
]
I'd need to research myself to find out all the facts. Something I normally do on any story.
But, from this story, no I do not agree with the decision.
I personally think America is way too puritan about the naked body. I don't have an issue with body parts.
But, in this case - - - it seems too intentional, extremist, and its flat out rude. I wouldn't support a woman overtly flaunting herself on display either.
Manners and Decorum. Which I believe most people would adhere to.
originally posted by: LordDraconia
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: LordDraconia
Does that 45 year old man have the right to flash his hairy wrinkly old man balls at 6 year olds? Because if you say yes, you are putting his right to be disturbing over the kids right not to have to see that. That is putting something on a pedestal.
]
I'd need to research myself to find out all the facts. Something I normally do on any story.
But, from this story, no I do not agree with the decision.
I personally think America is way too puritan about the naked body. I don't have an issue with body parts.
But, in this case - - - it seems too intentional, extremist, and its flat out rude. I wouldn't support a woman flaunting herself on display either.
Manners and Decorum.
Thanks mmmm common ground and decency and manners.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: LordDraconia
Does that 45 year old man have the right to flash his hairy wrinkly old man balls at 6 year olds? Because if you say yes, you are putting his right to be disturbing over the kids right not to have to see that. That is putting something on a pedestal.
]
I'd need to research myself to find out all the facts. Something I normally do on any story.
But, from this story, no I do not agree with the decision.
I personally think America is way too puritan about the naked body. I don't have an issue with body parts.
But, in this case - - - it seems too intentional, extremist, and its flat out rude. I wouldn't support a woman overtly flaunting herself on display either.
Manners and Decorum. Which I believe most people would adhere to.
The referenced Daily Mail article, of course, does not claim that anyone, including the target here, has done anything untoward or wrong.
Merely that "it might happen" ... every verse same as the first.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: LordDraconia
The typical left tactic is to pretend they "feel your pain" to get your votes.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
Gryphon66...same to you. I'm offering a solution that is fair and equal and satisfies the wants and needs of both sides. Why won't Annee (or anyone supporting the trans) accept it?
I say it is because it isn't about fair and equal, it is about forced acceptance.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
Gryphon66...same to you. I'm offering a solution that is fair and equal and satisfies the wants and needs of both sides. Why won't Annee (or anyone supporting the trans) accept it?
I say it is because it isn't about fair and equal, it is about forced acceptance.
. I have to agree and they created even more racial divide in the process. There's more racial tensions now than I ever remember my whole life.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: LordDraconia
The typical left tactic is to pretend they "feel your pain" to get your votes. Then they ignore your group and let you fall away. Look at black and Hispanics. The left is their champion...until it isn't election time when they forget all about them. Look at the numbers. Obama's reign has hurt blacks more than anyone.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
a reply to: Gryphon66
Your taking this off the topic. Yes...that is what I believe of the left but we were talking about transgender people and the bathroom thing...again. I'm offering a fair and equal solution.