It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vaibow123
. . . but do the majority of the transgender community respect the rights of those on the other end of the spectrum? I'm not saying they don't, or should...
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: gladtobehere
This is the new world and these girls are going to have to learn to live in it.
No mention of any frightening behaviors or gestures, they were only frightened of the appearance.
The mother didn't know how to handle it? How about telling the truth? Children are vastly more adaptable than we give them credit for. And if they are terrified? It's because the mother is.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: LordDraconia
1. Which law(s) are you referring to that bestow the rights to demand examinations, in public, of citizen's genitals?
2. Who is going to serve as this supposed "Pee Police" and decide if someone looks male or female enough and check out their "status?"
originally posted by: LordDraconia
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: LordDraconia
1. Which law(s) are you referring to that bestow the rights to demand examinations, in public, of citizen's genitals?
2. Who is going to serve as this supposed "Pee Police" and decide if someone looks male or female enough and check out their "status?"
This shouldn't be some thing that is dictated and we didn't need the Nanny State to nanny us and tell us how to do it for thousands of years of bathroom history. They should just use common sense. If you can "pass" you can go in the bathroom you want. If you can't then you should go in the bathroom people are "incorrectly" identifying you as. But to pass a law that then lets grown men flash their meat and 2 veg at little girls and not be thrown out of the locker room as was linked somewhere here on ATS www.dailymail.co.uk... html
AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR SINGLE-SEX MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY BATHROOM AND 2 CHANGING FACILITIES IN SCHOOLS AND PUBLIC AGENCIES AND TO CREATE 3 STATEWIDE CONSISTENCY IN REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND PUBLIC 4 ACCOMMODATIONS.
originally posted by: LordDraconia
But to pass a law that then lets grown men flash their meat and 2 veg at little girls and not be thrown out of the locker room as was linked somewhere here on ATS www.dailymail.co.uk... html
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: gladtobehere
This is the new world and these girls are going to have to learn to live in it.
No mention of any frightening behaviors or gestures, they were only frightened of the appearance.
The mother didn't know how to handle it? How about telling the truth? Children are vastly more adaptable than we give them credit for. And if they are terrified? It's because the mother is.
Translation: SCREW THE CHILDREN! They better learn to live with our demands or we will come down on them like a hammer, call them homophones, bigot or whatever we must. And you...the bitch calling yourself a "Mother"...you better start backing us up whether you agree with our views or not. You and your views, opinions and even your rights don't matter. Only WE are important and WE demand special treatment no matter who it hurts. Yes...no matter who it hurts.
originally posted by: LordDraconia
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: gladtobehere
This is the new world and these girls are going to have to learn to live in it.
No mention of any frightening behaviors or gestures, they were only frightened of the appearance.
The mother didn't know how to handle it? How about telling the truth? Children are vastly more adaptable than we give them credit for. And if they are terrified? It's because the mother is.
Translation: SCREW THE CHILDREN! They better learn to live with our demands or we will come down on them like a hammer, call them homophones, bigot or whatever we must. And you...the bitch calling yourself a "Mother"...you better start backing us up whether you agree with our views or not. You and your views, opinions and even your rights don't matter. Only WE are important and WE demand special treatment no matter who it hurts. Yes...no matter who it hurts.
I knew that any grown ups that disagreed with them didn't have any rights of freedoms. But how they can put transgenders on a pedestal over our children, our very future? I don't get it. Does not sound like what Dawkins called an, "Evolutionary Stable Survival Strategy" I believe.
originally posted by: LordDraconia
But how they can put transgenders on a pedestal over our children, our very future? I don't get it. Does not sound like what Dawkins called an, "Evolutionary Stable Survival Strategy" I believe.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
YOU are the reason they are killing themselves. YOU.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Those poor little snowflakes. We mustn't trigger them by having them wash their hands next to a trans person.
You go boy! What a SJW you are!!
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
What would any Doctor say about a person who kills themselves because others refuse to accept their life choices?
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
YOU are the reason they are killing themselves. YOU.
Really? Explain that to me then. What have I done to make someone kill themselves?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
YOU are the reason they are killing themselves. YOU.
Really? Explain that to me then. What have I done to make someone kill themselves?
Because you and others like you insist that they are mentally ill freaks who don't deserve the same rights as everyone else. Any person who gets that pounded into their brain every day is going to be negatively affected by it.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: LordDraconia
But how they can put transgenders on a pedestal over our children, our very future? I don't get it. Does not sound like what Dawkins called an, "Evolutionary Stable Survival Strategy" I believe.
You have it backwards.
First off: Equality doesn't have a pedestal.
Second: Those putting themselves on a pedestal are the ones denying Equality.