It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

'Hillary Clinton has to go to jail!': Donald the counter-puncher clobbers Hillary

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 09:50 AM

originally posted by: MEDIKATED
Trump is going to counterpunch her and then donkey punch her.

Then he will schlong her.

posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 09:53 AM

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Unfortunately, all of Trump's "counterpunches" were merely more lies ..

It's sad, really.

You mean CNN (Clinton News Network) as your source? Ok.

posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 08:11 PM
If he wants to drive home the point, he should change his arguments. He ought to ask her about her SF 312 and then follow up with something like:

Intentional Mishandling

. This type of mishandling case results from a willful and knowing disregard of security regulations by the accused. In these cases, the accused is well aware of the requirements of the regulations, but chooses to ignore them because he did not want to be subject to such constraints. This type of case is often characterized as a “self-help” case. The most common types of self-help cases are:


“I needed to cut a few corners in order to get the mission accomplished!”

This excuse is most commonly used by those who view the classification regulations as impediments to their ability to do their jobs effectively or efficiently. A common scenario is taking classified information from one job to the next, but doing so by improperly copying information to CDs, thumb drives, and personal laptops. It is very possible to accomplish the same end using the security regulations (see Chapter 2 on transportation and transmission of classified information), but rather than do so, the individual takes the easy way out and knowingly violates the regulations.


“Everyone knew this report was not properly classified as Secret so I went ahead and took off the markings.”

This excuse is not seen in courts-martial as often as the others are, but the first part of the statement is a common sentiment in many intelligence circles. Most of those who work in the field, however, understand that just because something has been published by the media does not mean it is no longer classified. Information remains classified until it is formally declassified by proper authority.

While compelling, and often creative, such excuses rarely amount to a legal defense or justification to dereliction of duty or orders violation charges, but may be persuasive as to forum or disposition. Especially when the use was designed by the accused to benefit the Navy, such excuses are often used in the defense extenuation and mitigation case. Additionally, a self-help case on a battlefield, e.g., sharing classified information with a coalition partner that does not have the appropriate clearance, could contain significant facts to support a relatively lenient command response.

So they look at the intent behind the violation of proper handling procedures of classified information. I wonder what they will determine Hillary's intent to be?

Other Cases Involving Classified Information(dorect .pdf link)

Granted the above deals with court marshal procedures, but the arguments remain the same in a civilian criminal court.

edit on 6-6-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: what kind of document? I claim dyslexia...

new topics
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in