It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Social Media Vows to End All Hate Speech, Yet They Promote Crimes Against Humanity....WT*?

page: 2
15
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:24 AM
link   
Apparently the Nazi's are in control of online MSM..... hate speech is a American First Amendment right..... it's BS to add hate speech in this Nazi style crack down.


edit on 31-5-2016 by imitator because: (computer locking up)

edit on 31-5-2016 by imitator because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-5-2016 by imitator because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:29 AM
link   
a reply to: paxnatus

Hate speech laws are dubious, much like any restriction of speech. Any use of force that suppresses any speech, no matter how hateful the speech may be, is always more oppressive and detrimental to a free society than letting it be spoken.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:30 AM
link   
www.bloomberg.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">bloomberg

I am not a social media whore by any means but this is the beginning of the loss of freedom of speech!!

Pax



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:32 AM
link   
Facebook is an owned site, so I guess that's their right to moderate. They do the same here on ATS, but with even more restrictions.
edit on 31-5-2016 by amicktd because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: imod02




I have a question, who or what is the driving force behind censorship and PC, and why does it have so much power


Superstition, the same superstition that put Socrates to death for "corrupting the youth", the idea that any consequence of human speech is the fault of the speaker, and not the listener. Look at the wording of the hate speech laws throughout the world. "Incitement", "generating hate"—the notion here is that people can manipulate the physical world with words and be charged for it, which is no different than condemning someone for sorcery.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:37 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
A wonderful answer, but im still missing who or what is doing it, the monster of PC and censorship has to have a head.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: amicktd
Facebook is an owned site, so I guess that's their right to moderate. They do the same here on ATS, but with even more restrictions.


Yes everyone should know better about Facebook..... but.... the list includes Google and Microsoft Corp, everyone knows the government is in their pockets.... they have no right to trample on our voices.

It's also the Jewish youth group, UEJF being like Nazi's... how ironic.


edit on 31-5-2016 by imitator because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: paxnatus
www.bloomberg.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">bloomberg

I am not a social media whore by any means but this is the beginning of the loss of freedom of speech!!

Pax

I think we lost that freedom a long time ago, but only now are the people waking up



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   
Cutting the foreskin off of a baby boys penis is cruel too but I don't see Christians speaking out against it in huge numbers, in fact they allow it for the most part.

This whole Islamaphobia thing is getting really annoying. If you call one religion out for something then why not other religions who do the same thing?

Circumcision in any form is genital mutilation! It serves no good purpose.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:55 AM
link   
a reply to: imod02


I have a question, who or what is the driving force behind censorship and PC, and why does it have so much power

The main stream media is owned by mega corp., start there.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Cutting the foreskin off of a baby boys penis is cruel too but I don't see Christians speaking out against it in huge numbers, in fact they allow it for the most part.

This whole Islamaphobia thing is getting really annoying. If you call one religion out for something then why not other religions who do the same thing?

Circumcision in any form is genital mutilation! It serves no good purpose.

I could be wrong but I dont think Christians do circumcision



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Do we really even want facebookers knowing whats going on in the world?

I make money, they compete for their fragile egos.

Let's keep em memed up and sell em junk.
......

On topic.

Fkrbird cannot be trusted. He's too busy spending black budget tax dollars imo.

You could say Fkrbird actually is the "anticlit"

Not much needs to be said about the morality of the mutilations.

Facebook users deserve the canned view imo.




posted on May, 31 2016 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Cutting the foreskin off of a baby boys penis is cruel too but I don't see Christians speaking out against it in huge numbers, in fact they allow it for the most part.

This whole Islamaphobia thing is getting really annoying. If you call one religion out for something then why not other religions who do the same thing?

Circumcision in any form is genital mutilation! It serves no good purpose.




Clit removal vs trimmed foreskin for cleanliness.

In males it stops the build up of smegma..a white cheeselike substance that accumulates on foreskin or....etc and stuff

Islamaphobia?

All righty, then.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

FGM is an abhorrence. It is basically brutality of girls and women. Need to tell it at it is... mutilation.

These cultures are just not fit for the modern world.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   
Private companies or not.

Somebody is getting real nervous about these issues.

I wonder who? and what they are so scared of?




posted on May, 31 2016 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Private companies or not.

Somebody is getting real nervous about these issues.

I wonder who? and what they are so scared of?





Well all they can do is remove the post. The article states that many people have moved to a whole new level of bigotry online ever since the immigration crisis. Facebook doesn't want a bunch of people posting hatred on their site obviously, which is their right. If people want to be a bigot, then they can use there "free speech" and start saying it to people's faces.



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: amicktd

originally posted by: xuenchen
Private companies or not.

Somebody is getting real nervous about these issues.

I wonder who? and what they are so scared of?





Well all they can do is remove the post. The article states that many people have moved to a whole new level of bigotry online ever since the immigration crisis. Facebook doesn't want a bunch of people posting hatred on their site obviously, which is their right. If people want to be a bigot, then they can use there "free speech" and start saying it to people's faces.


Would you be a bigot if you posted a factual news story about a violent crime?
Would it be "hate speech" if a person posted a factual incident of a protected class who committed a crime?

Use all the buzzwords you choose to name call people who say something factual as hate speech, however, this is what will come of this nonsense.

I'll bet you anything you like, Facebook will not censor anything hateful said against white people nor Christians, which in of itself, shows the political agenda behind this censoring nonsense!



posted on May, 31 2016 @ 01:50 PM
link   
ATS doesn't allow its members to use the f-word, the c-word, or the n-word. Nor does it allow outright hate speech threads or personal attacks on other members. It also doesn't allow nude pictures, centerfold zoom shots, and links to porn sites.

Does that mean that ATS is stomping on y'alls "free speech" too ?


Or does it just simply mean that ATS is trying to keep its site family-friendly while at the same time trying to maintain a friendly, respectful atmosphere for its members to partake in ?



Hmmm...



Infantile foot stomping ?

or

Mature social interaction ?


.......


Infantile foot stomping ?

or

Mature social interaction ?


......




Gosh, it's just so darned tough to decide which is the better path for an online social media service to choose from.




posted on May, 31 2016 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: CranialSponge
ATS doesn't allow its members to use the f-word, the c-word, or the n-word. Nor does it allow outright hate speech threads or personal attacks on other members. It also doesn't allow nude pictures, centerfold zoom shots, and links to porn sites.

Does that mean that ATS is stomping on y'alls "free speech" too ?


Or does it just simply mean that ATS is trying to keep its site family-friendly while at the same time trying to maintain a friendly, respectful atmosphere for its members to partake in ?
If you think ATS is family friendly and has a respectful atmosphere then it could be you are thinking of some other place



Hmmm...



Infantile foot stomping ?

or

Mature social interaction ?


.......


Infantile foot stomping ?

or

Mature social interaction ?


......




Gosh, it's just so darned tough to decide which is the better path for an online social media service to choose from.





posted on May, 31 2016 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: paxnatus

It's Facebook - what should we expect? Free speech isn't the goal of sites like that; conforming to whatever those in control are pushing is the goal.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join