It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SomeDumbBroad
The constant upheaval of this victim mentality is absurd. When people use papercuts as examples, they make a mockery of stab woulds. We used to call people like this pious, vain or just outright assholes. Now we are forced to call them by whatever "gender" they decide to come up with tomorrow.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: In4ormant
a reply to: introvert
Stretching a little there.
No stretch needed. I only used their own words to show the folly in their opinion.
originally posted by: onequestion
originally posted by: SomeDumbBroad
The constant upheaval of this victim mentality is absurd. When people use papercuts as examples, they make a mockery of stab woulds. We used to call people like this pious, vain or just outright assholes. Now we are forced to call them by whatever "gender" they decide to come up with tomorrow.
We live in victim society.
I have really been enjoying Jocko Wllinks podcast and perspective on extreme ownership lately. Under normal circumstances his podcast would be to macho for me, but in todays world it give me some good balance.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: introvert
I am not a their, I am a they please get it right or I will have to report you to the proper authorities.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: onequestion
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't you get all snowflake on us a couple of Christmas ago with the whole selling breaking bad toys in a toy store?
I think it's kind of funny you being offended by people who get offended.
It's perfectly obvious that he's referring to people who are allowed to take offense and be coddled as victims at almost any speech, not just hate speech, because they don't like it.
Wahhhhh! You hurt my feelings when you said that!! Bahh, wrong! Only you can control your feelings and it's about damn time you take ownership over the way you feel and stop trying to police other peoples language.
The right of possessing something. YOU possess your own feelings, they are not mine to determine. They are yours and only you can effect them. Feeling victimized by my words is a choice YOU make for yourself, not one that I make for you.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
Then the "mods' get called and the Whaaaaaambulance comes in and sensors your post because you may have potentially possibly perhaps pissed someone off.
Censorship in any form or fashion is not conducive to honest discourse. If someone is always sour, the majority will eventually stop responding. If censorship is introduced, the true opinions will be stifled/censored and you will end up with 'nosebleed' drivel that is politically correct meaningless to everyone and useful to no-one.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: introvert
I'm simply pointing out that I prefer you call me "they" and not "their".
How is that a personal attack?
Are you delusional?
feed-back into these feeling states with a cognitive component
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: In4ormant
It's perfectly obvious that he's referring to people who are allowed to take offense and be coddled as victims at almost any speech, not just hate speech, because they don't like it.
He said this:
Wahhhhh! You hurt my feelings when you said that!! Bahh, wrong! Only you can control your feelings and it's about damn time you take ownership over the way you feel and stop trying to police other peoples language.
The right of possessing something. YOU possess your own feelings, they are not mine to determine. They are yours and only you can effect them. Feeling victimized by my words is a choice YOU make for yourself, not one that I make for you.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: onequestion
I have a great memory.