It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: AlienView
originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
originally posted by: AlienView
originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
a reply to: AlienView
Women are easier for us to reason with and are more prone to want peaceful solutions than Man's propensity to war and violence.
How do you explain people like Diane Feinstien, Hillary Clinton and Madeline Albright? This doesn't sound too "reasonable" to me.
Even for those who believe in the gender equality of Witchcraft - There are good witches and bad witches.
Yin and Yang [a Hindu concept] may refer to a balance between male and female.
But whern you talk about Humans, be they male, female or it - Sex is irrelevant, the bad ones still always manifest.
And sexism of any sort is irrelevant - A macho dick-headed politician might be evil and so might a sweet sleazy female politician.
To date most of Human history has been controlled, manipulated screwed up by males.
And if females gained control would they make things any better? Not by necessity
-Good and eviel are concepts that are beyond sex and gender.
That's all great...but these particular women, and many like them, are running our nation.
Yes, they are - but this has nothing to do with sex or gender [except you know Hillay is going to go hard for the feminist,
gay, and transgender vote] - But the women you are talking bout represent forces that have nothing to do with feminism
That is what I like about Trump, dick-head or not, I trust Trump represents Trump, and does not 'appear' to be a part ot
the international cartels controlling the 'New World Order'.
Unfortunately evern though I would never vote for the Hillary group - I also, from experience, don't trust anyone involved in
real estate either. I may not vote.
Social Justice Warrior. A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A social justice warrior, or SJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the groups they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular blogger or commenter of the moment, hoping that they will "get SJ points" and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are "correct" in their social circle. The SJW's favorite activity of all is to dogpile. Their favorite websites to frequent are Livejournal and Tumblr. They do not have relevant favorite real-world places, because SJWs are primarily civil rights activists only online.
originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: zinc12
What is with all these topics about sex and who is what. What in earth does it matter. Jeesh.
originally posted by: zinc12
One way to conquer a country is to feminise the native males both on a mental level and on a chemical level.
Mental level through media programming/education system and chemical level through food, air, water etc
Then you let large numbers of un-feminised more aggressive males in through manipulating the immigration policy's of the target country.
The result is the feminised native males being more passive will give up without a fight...game over!
In nature the male is the protector, has a built in hunting nature. He will fiercely protect the pack, will fight to mate in order to continue his genetic line.
Added to this nonsense is women wanting males to be more sensitive, more emotional, more in touch with there feminine side. If you want that who do you think will protect you?
Feminised males are naturally submissive/passive so are more likely to boast about being conquered then complain about it and low fertility means their genetic line has come to an end anyway and they will proudly embrace that too!
originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
In nature? All you described is a predator like behavior. Like wolves and lions. There are millions of beings on earth. Many of which the female is the stronger one. Like sharks or spiders. Also we're not animals, we don't live by our baser instincts. Sentient beings choose their own paths. Female warriors and protectors exist. Some men are whiny and emotional and make up crap about them being feminized and some nonsense about foreign invaders to make themselves feel more powerful. People are different from one and other. It's not just: Man hunt food, Woman cook food.
Also why don't you list a single country that has been conquered in this manner? Cause you cant't...cause it's stupid
originally posted by: zinc12
In nature the male is the protector, has a built in hunting nature. He will fiercely protect the pack, will fight to mate in order to continue his genetic line.