It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Profusion
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump told California voters Friday that he can solve their water crisis, declaring, "There is no drought."
Speaking at a rally in Fresno, Calif., Trump accused state officials of denying water to Central Valley farmers so they can send it out to sea "to protect a certain kind of three-inch fish."
"We're going to solve your water problem. You have a water problem that is so insane. It is so ridiculous where they're taking the water and shoving it out to sea," Trump said at a rally that drew thousands.
Trump tells California 'there is no drought'
"There is no drought"
"You have a water problem that is so insane"
Can someone explain how that's not a contradiction?
That is kinda crazy.
How many states get their water from the Colorado River?
Maybe he wants to dam the river at the border, so Mexico gets no water.
The amendment was simple. It would have prevented the federal government from spending any money to implement biological decisions that are denying Californians access to essential water supplies from the Delta. This prohibition would have lasted one year.
California collects and distributes water through large infrastructure projects, including reservoirs and aqueducts. These reservoirs have the potential to hold about 42 million acre-feet of water, enough to submerge all of Iowa in nearly knee-deep water. However, each year one-half of the rain and snow that falls in California is permitted to run off without being managed. Of the water that is managed, nearly one-half is used for environmental purposes, such as providing in-stream flows for fish and to provide habitat for other wildlife.
The Westlands Water District, known for its affluent Republican farmers, its political clout and its bedeviling lack of water, would receive a paltry 5% of its federal water allocation.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: visitedbythem
For irrigation? That would be sort of pricey, wouldn't it?
There is enough water to drink. It's the almonds and lawns that seem to be the problem. Sucking up that ground water.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
That will be the price of living in a dessert. Want to farm a dessert? Its gonna cost you.... Right? How much sense does it make to farm a dessert to begin with?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: visitedbythem
For irrigation? That would be sort of pricey, wouldn't it?
There is enough water to drink. It's the almonds and lawns that seem to be the problem. Sucking up that ground water.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
This is a classic example of Trump being Trump. He meets a group of special interest people (in this case farmers), promises that he understands what they're going through (he doesn't), claims that he can solve all their problems (but then doesn't exactly explain how) and then leaves. In a week's time if someone calls him out on what he said, like the fact that he said that there's no drought, he'll deny that he said it, because he's a giant bloviating puffball of hair with a cheato suspended beneath him who has no shame.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
If trump says there's no drought then it is thus.
Im in OC and i remember water conservation efforts last summerto about October.. it was grim.
Hes a billionaire after all. Im sure he can influence whoever he needs to in order to give cali water again. This is America, its all about 'influencing' using money,power, other*
Lets be great again!
Trump will take america where it needs to go Asap.
originally posted by: CoBaZ
Hmm, Pipe line of Alaska, not for Oil but for ice from the glaciers, A true shovel ready job, Wrap the pipe in solar heated electrical tape to keep the pipe line flowing, Have people chopping ice from big blocks to little blocks and throwing them into the pipe, End target of pipe system be the lakes that are low, fill the north one first and connect the ones south to the northern one.
There we go, More fresh water.
Gainful employment for those willing to move an chop ice.
Sure the northern ice line is receding, but the further it goes, why let it go to waste up there, Pipe it south where it will help.
There we go a ready Made Business Solution.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: misskat1
a reply to: DJW001
They let us believe we own that land. But in reality camping is limited to 14 consecutive days, with a 30 day total camping limit per year.
Can you imagine what the land would look like if 300 million people were allowed to camp there indefinitely?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: mOjOm
If the growers are making money off that pricey water, why should you pay for it?
In any case the notion of desalinization being used for irrigation water is ridiculous.