It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anti-Trump Protests Turning Violent In San Diego Now

page: 14
52
<< 11  12  13    15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DBCowboy

What does that have to do with me? You are trying to project your own assertions on to someone that has not expressed or implied such actions.




When a violent anti-Trump person kills someone, and you don't defend their violent actions, I'll point it out.

Fair enough?




posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: DBCowboy

What does that have to do with me? You are trying to project your own assertions on to someone that has not expressed or implied such actions.




When a violent anti-Trump person kills someone, and you don't defend their violent actions, I'll point it out.

Fair enough?


Sure.

Let's hope that doesn't happen.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:11 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

There are "plants" within the crowd, specifically placed there to incite anger in those around them. The CIA agitators are just trying to assist in getting that Police State installed, but they need a good reason, that way, we will think that we deserved everything that we got.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:18 AM
link   
My favorite liberal group of all time were called the. "Sons of liberty" and they protested, rioted, and looted. Thank God they did!

They we're violent and are hero's.

Humans are violent get over it!



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:20 AM
link   
a reply to: LDragonFire

And we have someone who's honest enough to admit that they'll probably cheer when people's rights are infringed and someone dies as a result of the violence.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:32 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

A modern day weather underground.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:36 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Hopefully its the old toad trump himself.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:36 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Hopefully its the old toad trump himself.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: LDragonFire

And we have someone who's honest enough to admit that they'll probably cheer when people's rights are infringed and someone dies as a result of the violence.

I'm a realist I expect war in our neighborhoods

We have anti establishment candidates on the right and left there supporters are pissed at the status quo. What do you think the establishment is going to do about this?

I think things will get much more violent don't you?



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:39 AM
link   
a reply to: LDragonFire

Yes, but I certainly am not for it.

I may not agree with Bernie or Hillary, but I don't want them dead. Nor do I wish their supporters death.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Looselungjones2
a reply to: DBCowboy

Hopefully its the old toad trump himself.


You can wish for the death of Trump or anyone who supports him, it's your right.

It's authoritarian, but it's your right.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Do you think the establishment is gonna allow him to be president?

Trump, a Mexican, a Muslim, a Isis cell phone, trumps plane and a 9/11 type of event.

How will his supporters act?

The problem isn't just trump for the PTB but Bernie as well.

You don't think they will be JFK'D? How will there supporters react?

Might be a good thread.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 01:03 AM
link   
a reply to: LDragonFire

I think we attribute too much power and authority to the establishment.

If they are that powerful, then they might allow Trump to become president to give the impression that we have some semblance of control.

But regardless who becomes president, taxes will increase, freedoms will be lost, government will grow.

It's like the super Bowl. We can root for our favorite team, but Monday morning, we still have to go to work and carry on with our lives. Nothing will change.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 01:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
a reply to: IAMTAT

There are "plants" within the crowd, specifically placed there to incite anger in those around them. The CIA agitators are just trying to assist in getting that Police State installed, but they need a good reason, that way, we will think that we deserved everything that we got.


It's either that, or they're just a buncha assholes.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 01:53 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You said when they do as if it was a fact so i just chose the big donbowski himself. Wouldnt want it to be an innocent.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   
Trump is campaigning for violence and war crimes, and encourages violence and aggression against protesters at his rallies--- He blames them for the country's problems. He's already hurting the country. And look how happy his supporters are when things turn violent. The more violent it gets, the more votes for Trump. And what do they want to do? Ban people based on religion, build a wall around the country, forcefully deport 11 million people, increase torture, kill innocent families of terrorists, silence the critical media, empower law enforcement-- you know, make America great again.

I'm grateful for the protests.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 02:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: theantediluvian

I can't stand Hillary.
I despise Sanders ideology of socialism.

Yet I have not broken a single window, thrown a single punch.

In fact, I even started a thread a while back stating that I would defend their right to speak against anyone who would want to silence them.

Funny. I haven't heard a single person who would want to do the same for Trump on the authoritarian side.


See, to me that sounds like somebody on the verge of embracing an authoritarian mindset. An individual doesn't become any more accountable for the actions of others because another person believes he should be.

It reminds me of the many times I've heard something to the effect of "If terrorists don't represent most Muslims, then why don't these 'good' Muslims ever speak out?" Forget that Muslims do and it goes unreported by a large swath of the media that happens to also be where these people who asks these rhetorical questions get their "news" — what leads people to believe that there is an obligation to begin with and worse, that if that nonexistent obligation isn't met it signals tacit approval?

Next thing you know it's "we need to ban Muslims" and "we need to monitor Muslims" and "Muslims should be on a list."

How many times has Donald Trump referenced Kate Steinle? Her own brother came out last year and said that Donald Trump was sensationalizing his sister's death to advance his "not rational" agenda. What is it that Donald Trump is hoping to accomplish when he name drops Katie Steinle every single time he discusses immigration? Or rather what sort of irrational thinking is he hoping to appeal to if not that of a person who believes that all members of a group — whether those people even claim an affiliation with one another or not — are equally responsible for the actions of any member of the group?

In my opinion, the answer is quite clear — he's fanning the flames of authoritarianism.

That said, because you say you never see it, I repeat for the umpteenth time in recent months:

I do not support violence, destruction of property or blocking access to venues. I do not support the rushing of stages, grabbing of microphones or any sort of threatening or intimidating behavior.

I do support Donald Trump's right to speak and the right of his supporters to hear him speak.

I unequivocally support those rights across the board. I also support the right for people to congregate and exercise their rights to free speech by protesting and that includes protesting outside of political rallies. I support the same rights for the counter-protesters. I support the rights of the campaign to remove disruptive individuals from the venue. I also support the rights of the individual being escorted from the venue to not be physically assaulted by members of the crowd.

I don't feel that I am obligated to say that once let alone repeatedly to avoid being held accountable for things that other people do that I have no control over but I'm not so intractable that I won't.
edit on 2016-5-28 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 03:14 AM
link   
Great news for Trump again.


Quite surprised the police din't open fire with rubber bullets. I thought they said it was going to be zero tolerance to any violence.



posted on May, 28 2016 @ 03:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
And we added catapults, a moat, and flamethrowers




And these guys!




posted on May, 28 2016 @ 05:02 AM
link   
If these mexican flag waving aimals will do this because they dont like our candidates...... imagine what they will do if they start getting deported



new topics

top topics



 
52
<< 11  12  13    15  16 >>

log in

join