It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Domo1
So wait. She identifies as a woman, and is pissed off when there is a sign for the women's restroom?
Apparently, she asked if she could use the ladies room and was told NO.
Why even ask, unless you want to make a fuss?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: everyone
I took a different understanding away from the article than you did, apparently. No, in fact, the change in policy for the signs was a direct effect of the ferry company trying to properly redress the woman's very valid grievance.
She didn't demand the change. I submit that there was a wider meaning to the change in signs than you're detecting. It seems to me that this ferry company wanted to make a bit of a statement about compliance with these new laws in Jersey.
Relabel the third bathroom ... the one designed for folks with disabilities? How do you think it should be relabeled?
Yes you are right. I misinterpreted those details and i was wrong in thinking this was the demand. I however still disagree on that decision as a whole as i stand by my original point that that solution was not very helpful and even conflicting to transsexuals in general.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Domo1
So wait. She identifies as a woman, and is pissed off when there is a sign for the women's restroom?
Apparently, she asked if she could use the ladies room and was told NO.
Why even ask, unless you want to make a fuss?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Watcher777
So is this the true story we have all been fusing about. Maybe the story was incorrect from the beginning.
Again was that the OP's original story writer's agenda?
TransJersey
How do you figure this is the "true story"?
It's two stories about the same person.
#waaaaat?
EDIT: Were you trying to link this story? Tribunal ruling: Condor v Bisson
This was a recommendation from a group that supports alternate gender identities ... and I think gave some decent advice.
So, bearing this last point in mind, do we need to replace the signs “ladies and gents” on toilet doors with stick figures? No. You are not going to be taken to the tribunal for discrimination if your toilet signs still use words. However, you could be taken to tribunal if you or your employees do not treat a trans woman the same as you treat a woman. Most transgender people do not want special treatment, they want equal treatment that affords them the same rights and privileges as non-trans people of the same gender as their recognised gender.
Emphasis mine, which to me, says it all.
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Watcher777
So is this the true story we have all been fusing about. Maybe the story was incorrect from the beginning.
Again was that the OP's original story writer's agenda?
TransJersey
How do you figure this is the "true story"?
It's two stories about the same person.
#waaaaat?
EDIT: Were you trying to link this story? Tribunal ruling: Condor v Bisson
This was a recommendation from a group that supports alternate gender identities ... and I think gave some decent advice.
So, bearing this last point in mind, do we need to replace the signs “ladies and gents” on toilet doors with stick figures? No. You are not going to be taken to the tribunal for discrimination if your toilet signs still use words. However, you could be taken to tribunal if you or your employees do not treat a trans woman the same as you treat a woman. Most transgender people do not want special treatment, they want equal treatment that affords them the same rights and privileges as non-trans people of the same gender as their recognised gender.
Emphasis mine, which to me, says it all.
What was important about the article is that this is apparently a mission for this trans person, and I'm changing calling her a "woman" any longer because by her own admission she wants to be acknowledged as Mx not Mr or MS, because Mx is proud of being a transgender, which Is fine I guess....but then please don't try and convince others that your true "soul" is a woman, it's obviously not in this case.
originally posted by: everyone
a reply to: Annee
If a trans gender identifies as a woman then their should be no complaining from anyone including the "Woman" in question that he/she/it is referred to as a woman. You identify as a woman? Ok fine but then BE one.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Watcher777
So is this the true story we have all been fusing about. Maybe the story was incorrect from the beginning.
Again was that the OP's original story writer's agenda?
TransJersey
How do you figure this is the "true story"?
It's two stories about the same person.
#waaaaat?
EDIT: Were you trying to link this story? Tribunal ruling: Condor v Bisson
This was a recommendation from a group that supports alternate gender identities ... and I think gave some decent advice.
So, bearing this last point in mind, do we need to replace the signs “ladies and gents” on toilet doors with stick figures? No. You are not going to be taken to the tribunal for discrimination if your toilet signs still use words. However, you could be taken to tribunal if you or your employees do not treat a trans woman the same as you treat a woman. Most transgender people do not want special treatment, they want equal treatment that affords them the same rights and privileges as non-trans people of the same gender as their recognised gender.
Emphasis mine, which to me, says it all.
What was important about the article is that this is apparently a mission for this trans person, and I'm changing calling her a "woman" any longer because by her own admission she wants to be acknowledged as Mx not Mr or MS, because Mx is proud of being a transgender, which Is fine I guess....but then please don't try and convince others that your true "soul" is a woman, it's obviously not in this case.
You're now defining what's OK and not OK for a transgender woman?
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Watcher777
So is this the true story we have all been fusing about. Maybe the story was incorrect from the beginning.
Again was that the OP's original story writer's agenda?
TransJersey
How do you figure this is the "true story"?
It's two stories about the same person.
#waaaaat?
EDIT: Were you trying to link this story? Tribunal ruling: Condor v Bisson
This was a recommendation from a group that supports alternate gender identities ... and I think gave some decent advice.
So, bearing this last point in mind, do we need to replace the signs “ladies and gents” on toilet doors with stick figures? No. You are not going to be taken to the tribunal for discrimination if your toilet signs still use words. However, you could be taken to tribunal if you or your employees do not treat a trans woman the same as you treat a woman. Most transgender people do not want special treatment, they want equal treatment that affords them the same rights and privileges as non-trans people of the same gender as their recognised gender.
Emphasis mine, which to me, says it all.
What was important about the article is that this is apparently a mission for this trans person, and I'm changing calling her a "woman" any longer because by her own admission she wants to be acknowledged as Mx not Mr or MS, because Mx is proud of being a transgender, which Is fine I guess....but then please don't try and convince others that your true "soul" is a woman, it's obviously not in this case.
You're now defining what's OK and not OK for a transgender woman?
Anne she DOESN"T want to be acknowledged as a woman, Mx wants to be acknowledged as a transgender person....I'm not defining anything for Mx, however Mx seems to want to re-divine what a "Lady" is for the majority of women....thanks to Mx and company we all be reduced to symbols that seek to dilute the fact that Men and Women are biologically different. The more I discuss this the less sympathetic I become to sharing bathrooms with pre-surgery trans males....and to all the trans women out there that just want to go about your business and peacefully live the life of your chosen gender, I'm truly sad that you have this "rogue" group of mentally unstable people creating so much drama for you all.
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
Gender neutral pronouns were developed to open once male dominated professions to women, . . .
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
Gender neutral pronouns were developed to open once male dominated professions to women, !/2 of the population....not to create a new "Gender".....and No surgery is not a requirement to be transgender, but prior to surgery that person is still biologically a male or female.....what Mx wants, I believe, is to create a hybrid Gender and I guess that is in fact what they are.
Not all transgenders KNOW as children they are meant to be the opposite sex and the more I'm learning about this whole subject the more I think that enough people are becoming "trans" .....so yes "choosing" for a variety of reasons to become "trans"....and there is a side to that whole thing that gets very dark.
originally posted by: MountainLaurel
... No surgery is not a requirement to be transgender, but prior to surgery that person is still biologically a male or female.....
what Mx wants, I believe, is to create a hybrid Gender and I guess that is in fact what they are.
Not all transgenders KNOW as children they are meant to be the opposite sex and the more I'm learning about this whole subject the more I think that enough people are becoming "trans" .....so yes "choosing" for a variety of reasons to become "trans"
....and there is a side to that whole thing that gets very dark.
...and to all the trans women out there that just want to go about your business and peacefully live the life of your chosen gender, I'm truly sad that you have this "rogue" group of mentally unstable people creating so much drama for you all
originally posted by: Mclaneinc
Don't get these transgenders, you go to the toilet of the gender you have been operated on to transform you in to it...
Not bloody rocket science, no, you can't hang on to your former gender as a 'back up' in case you need a pee...