It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fascism isn't considered right wing, its by definition.
The most prominent early user of the term left-fascism was Jürgen Habermas, a sociologist and philosopher influenced by the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School. He used the term in the 1960s to distance the Frankfurt School from the violence and authoritarianism of left-wing terrorists.[1][2] Habermas, whose work emphasizes the importance of rational discourse, democratic institutions and opposition to violence, has made important contributions to conflict theory and is often associated with the radical left. Sociologist Irving Louis Horowitz, in his 1984 book "Winners and Losers", built on Vladimir Lenin's work "Left-Wing" Communism: An Infantile Disorder.[3] Lenin describes the enemies of the working class as opportunists and petty-bourgeois revolutionaries, which he links to anarchism. Horowitz argues that there was a similar political strain in the United States in the 1980s, which he characterizes as "left-wing fascism". Horowitz argues that it is dangerous to assume clear distinctions between left, centre and right, and that various combinations are possible. He warned of "left fascism" during later years of the European Years of Lead, which were rife with red-black terrorist groups such as the German Rote Armee Fraktion (RAF) and the Italian Red Brigades, which had mixed left- and right-wing influences.
But who are the real fascists in our midst? In “Liberal Fascism,” National Review columnist Jonah Goldberg shows that the original fascists are really on the left — and that liberals, from Woodrow Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton, have advocated policies and principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler and Mussolini. Replacing manufactured myths with enlightening research, Goldberg begins by showing how the Italian fascism, German Nazism and American Progressivism (forebear of modern liberalism) all drew from the same intellectual foundations the idea that the state can create a kind of social utopia for its citizens. He then traces fascism’s history in the U.S. — from Woodrow Wilson’s war socialism and FDR’s New Deal to today’s liberal push for a greater alliance between big business and government. Finally, Goldberg reveals the striking resemblances between the opinions advanced by Hitler and Mussolini and the current views of the left on such diverse issues as government’s role in the economy, campaign finance reform, campus “speech codes,” education, environmentalism, gun control, abortion, and euthanasia - See more at: www.conservativebookclub.com...
Paterakis was asked by School Board chairman Andy Ziegler to step away from the speakers’ podium after making what Ziegler said were inappropriate remarks. A school district security officer asked him to leave, and Paterakis refused. Sheriff’s deputies then stepped in to ask Paterakis to leave, according to a statement from sheriff’s spokesman Cpl. Dave Jacobs.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced a bill that would criminalize anti-transgender speech, with violators receiving up to two years in prison.
The new bill, introduced May 17 on the International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia, aims to amend the Canadian Criminal Code to expand the country’s “hate speech” prohibitions to include any public speech or communication that “promotes hatred” on the basis of “gender identity” or “gender expression.” It would also change the Canadian Human Rights Act to cover transgender people.
First off let me start by saying that I realize that Fascism is considered right-wing, but I believe we are beginning to see the rise of authoritarianism from the left.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: onequestion
First off let me start by saying that I realize that Fascism is considered right-wing, but I believe we are beginning to see the rise of authoritarianism from the left.
That's cause they are trying to use a false equivalency to American politics.
The Italian political process and parties, and German political process's and party's are hardly comparable to the American political system.
Check this out.
Hitler was a 'fascist' right ?
He was a self professed socialist that used unions to gain power, and he's a 'right' winger !
So bleeping wrong.
True some people just love calling the right 'fascists', and they are so wrong it ain't even funny.
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
drumpf lowered the bar, and there are idiots in every party
I have been following US politics since 1980 and I can't ever remember violence being this common, and it all started with the hate speech and not so sublte fascism coming from drumpf in phase 1
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: onequestion
First off let me start by saying that I realize that Fascism is considered right-wing, but I believe we are beginning to see the rise of authoritarianism from the left.
That's cause they are trying to use a false equivalency to American politics.
The Italian political process and parties, and German political process's and party's are hardly comparable to the American political system.
Check this out.
Hitler was a 'fascist' right ?
He was a self professed socialist that used unions to gain power, and he's a 'right' winger !
So bleeping wrong.
True some people just love calling the right 'fascists', and they are so wrong it ain't even funny.
On of Hitlers first acts was to ban trade unions.
National Socialism is not socialism.
originally posted by: jimbo999
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: onequestion
First off let me start by saying that I realize that Fascism is considered right-wing, but I believe we are beginning to see the rise of authoritarianism from the left.
That's cause they are trying to use a false equivalency to American politics.
The Italian political process and parties, and German political process's and party's are hardly comparable to the American political system.
Check this out.
Hitler was a 'fascist' right ?
He was a self professed socialist that used unions to gain power, and he's a 'right' winger !
So bleeping wrong.
True some people just love calling the right 'fascists', and they are so wrong it ain't even funny.
On of Hitlers first acts was to ban trade unions.
National Socialism is not socialism.
I dissagee. The National Socialist Workers Party Of Germany were certainly Socialists - at least when they came to power. But like many extreme Leftist organisations, they soon morphed into Totalitarianism - much lime the EU today has.
originally posted by: jimbo999
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
drumpf lowered the bar, and there are idiots in every party
I have been following US politics since 1980 and I can't ever remember violence being this common, and it all started with the hate speech and not so sublte fascism coming from drumpf in phase 1
Nonsense. It actually started with BLM in Fergussen long before Trump started coming to prominece. This is very much an extreme Left issue. It's a form of Totalitarianism. Fascism by the way is a Leftist ideology. It's commonly associated with Nazi Germany - but the misonception is that most people today dont realize that the Nazis were actually a Leftist Socialist organization. So th label is perfectly apt: Fascism it is.
National Socialism is not socialism.
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: ScepticScot
National Socialism is not socialism.
oh please! This is such a tired and untrue argument. lol its funny too.... making me laugh. There was a rift between national and International socialist groups.
originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
I had to look up WTF SJW meant.
From Urban dictionary
"SJW
Social Justice Warrior. A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A social justice warrior, or SJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the groups they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular blogger or commenter of the moment, hoping that they will "get SJ points" and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are "correct" in their social circle.
The SJW's favorite activity of all is to dogpile. Their favorite websites to frequent are Livejournal and Tumblr. They do not have relevant favorite real-world places, because SJWs are primarily civil rights activists only online.
#1:
A social justice warrior reads an essay about a form of internal misogyny where women and girls insult stereotypical feminine activities and characteristics in order to boost themselves over other women.
The SJW absorbs this and later complains in response to a Huffington Post article about a 10-year-old feminist's letter, because the 10-year-old called the color pink "prissy".
#2:
Commnter: "I don't like getting manicures. It's too prissy."
SJW: "Oh my god, how #ing dare you use that word, you disgusting sexist piece of sh$t!"
#sjw #dogpile #internet activist #slacktivism #angry people #tumblr #livejournal
by boiledchicken January 07, 2012
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: onequestion
Its not the size of the group that worries me its their power.
You have good reasons to be worried. I posit that what they're managing to achieve is marginalizing people who disagree with them out of the public square, or in the terms of the Internet, public space. Through their PC programs, the SJW crowd creates an atmosphere such that the only thing "normal" people can do is to take all measures necessary to avoid contact with these people. And that's because in their rants, they control language such that there's no persuading them to any middle ground.