It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Security Guard Arrested For Removing Man From Women’s Bathroom

page: 9
25
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone

You have not told me the point of your analogy.

And no transgenderism is not a fringe belief. It is well documented and well researched in medicine and science.


edit on 5/24/2016 by Deaf Alien because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: pl3bscheese
Don't you know that americans enjoy pissing themselves off and raising their blood pressures unnecessarily?


Gotta keep big pharma rolling in profits. We 'Murkins love us some blood pressure pills. Along with "stand at attention" little blue pills.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: rollanotherone

Equal rights is always the clear winner.

So, the rights of pedophiles need to be adhered to also? How about the rights of FGM believers. How about the rights of white supremacists? You allow one tiny minority, you need to allow all minorities their rights


Which Rights...

List them for me so we can discuss this, roll...

You've brought the thread to an interesting point and you're discarding it.

Which Rights?



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: pl3bscheese

False eh?



While businesses are required to provide restroom facilities for their employees, not every business is required to allow customers to use these restrooms. If a company chooses to allow public access, they must ensure the facilities conform to local plumbing codes and to the Americans with Disabilities Act.


smallbusiness.chron.com...



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: rollanotherone

You have not told me the point of your analogy.

And no transgenderism is not a fringe belief. It is well documented and well researched in medicine and science.


Yet only accounts for .03% of the population. Or some such number



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: rollanotherone

Are you seriously suggesting that instead of being tolerant and letting these people pee where they want, they should experience the indignity of wearing adult diapers?


Hey that's being intolerant to diaper wearers.

According to PC liberal logic, that is another hate crime you are propagating. The PC police will not tolerate your intolerance, prepare for a life behind bars with those criminal thoughts.


Are you posting from prison? You're one of the most hateful posters on this site... way to shatter the "we're all victims of PC" delusion.


WHAT ?

I thought I had that honor.

I must be slipping.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone



Yet only accounts for .03% of the population. Or some such number

.3% or about 700k.

So what?



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:26 PM
link   
Let's remember Federal government did just step in to the Public Restroom situation.

But, here is an interesting site.

Public Restrooms


Public Restrooms Business establishments are not specifically required by any Federal law to provide public restrooms. Some States however have adopted mandates for public restrooms in some locations and in some facilities. The American's With Disabilities Act (ADA) along with some State building codes do require that new and renovated public restrooms comply with accessibility standards and guidelines. Federal law does require that employers make restrooms available for employees but no federal law specifically requires businesses to make public restrooms available for customers. Americans must rely on public restroom mandates adopted via individual state or local ordinances. Consequently, many businesses' restrooms are not public restrooms and may legally be closed during certain hours, limited to employees or completely closed to the public. There are public restroom organizations such as the American Restroom Association that act as advocates for the availability of clean, safe, well designed public restrooms. We owe many thanks to such organizations for the level of access to public restrooms that we enjoy today. Much work remains to be done, specifically the enactment of Federal statutes mandating public restrooms. www.publicrestrooms.com...


Then we have OSHA (yes I know that's not public): americanrestroom.org...

And the advocates for Federal laws: The American Restroom Association



The American Restroom Association advocates for the availability of clean, safe, well designed public restrooms.

CURRENT INITIATIVES: FEDERAL PUBLIC RESTROOM REQUIREMENTS INITIATIVE

www.americanrestroom.org...

edit on 24-5-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

That's correct, false. You might want to take a basic logic course at some point.



Not every state requires a small business to open their restrooms to the public, though it’s usually good for a store’s reputation to do so. A business in a state that doesn’t require public access may choose to keep its restrooms for employees only to save on operating costs. However, several states including Illinois, Oregon and Texas have passed versions of the Restroom Access Law, a regulation that requires a business to open their restrooms to a patron with a legitimate medical need.


Please read my post again. Thanks.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777

Had the guy went in to the guys restroom there would have been no problems.

ANY guy that tries to go in to the womens restroom.

Would get escorted out.

The SG had NO WAY of knowing if it was a pervert playing dress up or real TG.
edit on 24-5-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:28 PM
link   
double post
edit on 24-5-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: xuenchen

Did she check her ID?


im willing to bet no. this is al a big farce.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: rollanotherone

Are you seriously suggesting that instead of being tolerant and letting these people pee where they want, they should experience the indignity of wearing adult diapers?


Hey that's being intolerant to diaper wearers.

According to PC liberal logic, that is another hate crime you are propagating. The PC police will not tolerate your intolerance, prepare for a life behind bars with those criminal thoughts.


Are you posting from prison? You're one of the most hateful posters on this site... way to shatter the "we're all victims of PC" delusion.


WHAT ?

I thought I had that honor.

I must be slipping.


You're not hateful, Neo, you're just a broken record.


What about the GUN OWNERS eh... Or the BANKERS...
What about THEIR SNIPPING RIGHTS.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: rollanotherone

Equal rights is always the clear winner.

So, the rights of pedophiles need to be adhered to also? How about the rights of FGM believers. How about the rights of white supremacists? You allow one tiny minority, you need to allow all minorities their rights


Which Rights...

List them for me so we can discuss this, roll...

You've brought the thread to an interesting point and you're discarding it.

Which Rights?


Simple google search pulled up this.

gizmodo.com...

Still makes me sick that this group can be allowed to exist. But, it's their belief and who am I to deny their beliefs.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TinfoilTP

They only compare because you are selectively choosing aspects of both things and narrowly defining them in a sensationalist way. You know DAMN well that people don't self-identify as adult diaper wearers and don't demand equal protections because they have to wear them (outside of standard disability access laws that apply to all disabilities equally).


Adult diaper wearers associate themselves as adult diaper wearers, what else could they associate themselves as?

If they are denied a seat at a diner and they also get physically removed, are you going to expect an arrest of the security guard? Maybe they want to go into the ladies bathroom to lay on the changing tables, can we get a law for that?



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: pl3bscheese

Should have KEPT READING.



Not every state requires a small business to open their restrooms to the public, though it’s usually good for a store’s reputation to do so.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:31 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

If you are, it's lost in incoherence.
edit on 5/24/2016 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:31 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I must say, I imagine the majority of transgenders just want to pee, however this law opens up a real can of worms, because perverts will take advantage of it.

Yes, they will, no doubt about it.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP

How about proving this is an issue/problem before continuing this line of reasoning? Because everything points to you originally trying to be facetious and now it looks like you are trying to put together a serious point here since I didn't laugh at your bad joke.
edit on 24-5-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777



I must say, I imagine the majority of transgenders just want to pee, however this law opens up a real can of worms, because perverts will take advantage of it.

It was rarely an issue before.



Yes, they will, no doubt about it.

Prove that the number of incidents will increase then.

The irony is that the Fundies are the ones who are endangering women and children by bringing attention to it.



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join