It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Security Guard Arrested For Removing Man From Women’s Bathroom

page: 10
25
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TinfoilTP

They only compare because you are selectively choosing aspects of both things and narrowly defining them in a sensationalist way. You know DAMN well that people don't self-identify as adult diaper wearers and don't demand equal protections because they have to wear them (outside of standard disability access laws that apply to all disabilities equally).


Adult diaper wearers associate themselves as adult diaper wearers, what else could they associate themselves as?

If they are denied a seat at a diner and they also get physically removed, are you going to expect an arrest of the security guard? Maybe they want to go into the ladies bathroom to lay on the changing tables, can we get a law for that?


What about my 5 week old daughter???? How do I explain to her, daddy has to wait for the 49 year old man, who identifies as a 6 year old girl, that we have to wait for "her" to finish before we can use the table to change a "true" diaper wearer?!?!

/sarc.




posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Why would they be denied a seat at a diner...?

You think they would just waltz into a diner wearing a diaper and no pants or anything??



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96

Maybe you are but it's lost in incoherence.


It absolutely warms my heart.

That if I ever become sexually 'confused' and decide to go under the knife, and turn myself in to a 'woman'.

You will be right on ATS fighting for my right to use the rest room of my choice.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: rollanotherone

Equal rights is always the clear winner.

So, the rights of pedophiles need to be adhered to also? How about the rights of FGM believers. How about the rights of white supremacists? You allow one tiny minority, you need to allow all minorities their rights


Which Rights...

List them for me so we can discuss this, roll...

You've brought the thread to an interesting point and you're discarding it.

Which Rights?


Simple google search pulled up this.

gizmodo.com...

Still makes me sick that this group can be allowed to exist. But, it's their belief and who am I to deny their beliefs.


So the Right to Assemble.
Protected in The First in the US's case and other writs across the board...

As sick as it is, yes they should be allowed to "parade", as gross as I find it, and as much as I wish someone would slip their fingers on the Reaper Drone button...

There is a reason people like me are not in charge of Human Rights Laws, thank God for the softies because there'd be a trail of carnage if some of us were left to our devices.


What other Rights were you thinking about?



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Honestly we really don't know for sure, because this is something new and there are no stats available,



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777

No it is not something new.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: neo96

I must say, I imagine the majority of transgenders just want to pee, however this law opens up a real can of worms, because perverts will take advantage of it.

Yes, they will, no doubt about it.


Yea but, only law abiding citizens adhere to laws. If they were criminals before the law, they will still be criminals after the law. Point is, we don't need any new laws to allow this pissing match to continue. As has been said before, this is a new issue that's being used to draw attention away from actual real world problems.

Dangle the keys in front of the sheep to distract from what the other hand is doing.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TinfoilTP

They only compare because you are selectively choosing aspects of both things and narrowly defining them in a sensationalist way. You know DAMN well that people don't self-identify as adult diaper wearers and don't demand equal protections because they have to wear them (outside of standard disability access laws that apply to all disabilities equally).


Adult diaper wearers associate themselves as adult diaper wearers, what else could they associate themselves as?

If they are denied a seat at a diner and they also get physically removed, are you going to expect an arrest of the security guard? Maybe they want to go into the ladies bathroom to lay on the changing tables, can we get a law for that?


What about my 5 week old daughter???? How do I explain to her, daddy has to wait for the 49 year old man, who identifies as a 6 year old girl, that we have to wait for "her" to finish before we can use the table to change a "true" diaper wearer?!?!

/sarc.


OMG this is hilarious,



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Don't even... I tried being your friend once, remember? You wanted no part of it.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777



OMG this is hilarious


Examples of Poe's Law are hilarious.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Stormdancer777

No it is not something new.


As far as the law goes, yes it is,



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: rollanotherone

Equal rights is always the clear winner.

So, the rights of pedophiles need to be adhered to also? How about the rights of FGM believers. How about the rights of white supremacists? You allow one tiny minority, you need to allow all minorities their rights


Which Rights...

List them for me so we can discuss this, roll...

You've brought the thread to an interesting point and you're discarding it.

Which Rights?


Simple google search pulled up this.

gizmodo.com...

Still makes me sick that this group can be allowed to exist. But, it's their belief and who am I to deny their beliefs.


So the Right to Assemble.
Protected in The First in the US's case and other writs across the board...

As sick as it is, yes they should be allowed to "parade", as gross as I find it, and as much as I wish someone would slip their fingers on the Reaper Drone button...

There is a reason people like me are not in charge of Human Rights Laws, thank God for the softies because there'd be a trail of carnage if some of us were left to our devices.


What other Rights were you thinking about?

I know what you want me to say, and I will refuse to stoop to that level. As a father of a little girl, I will not go there. It's already against all laws of humanity and should not be allowed.




posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TinfoilTP

How about proving this is an issue/problem before continuing this line of reasoning? Because everything points to you originally trying to be facetious and now it looks like you are trying to put together a serious point here since I didn't laugh at your bad joke.


So it is more clear now.
Only favored perversions get preferential treatment or the politically expedient. Adult diaper wearing is not a divisive enough issue to get a PC makeover. Got it.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Stormdancer777



OMG this is hilarious


Examples of Poe's Law are hilarious.


It was funny, I feel guilty for laughing, the visual was funny, arrest me, lol



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:40 PM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone

It's already clearly implied in your little "analogy". He was just calling you on it. Next time do not make bad analogies.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Stormdancer777

No it is not something new.


And see, there is that dual camp on the same side of this issue. It's either a new issues, or it's been around for some time now. Which is it? Because I've seen both now from this camp.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TinfoilTP

How about proving this is an issue/problem before continuing this line of reasoning? Because everything points to you originally trying to be facetious and now it looks like you are trying to put together a serious point here since I didn't laugh at your bad joke.


So it is more clear now.
Only favored perversions get preferential treatment or the politically expedient. Adult diaper wearing is not a divisive enough issue to get a PC makeover. Got it.


Are we talking about, people who need them or adults that like wearing them as a fetish?

edit on 24-5-2016 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96

Don't even... I tried being your friend once, remember? You wanted no part of it.


Like I would EVER do that.

I'm rather content being a man,

LOL



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: rollanotherone

Equal rights is always the clear winner.

So, the rights of pedophiles need to be adhered to also? How about the rights of FGM believers. How about the rights of white supremacists? You allow one tiny minority, you need to allow all minorities their rights


Which Rights...

List them for me so we can discuss this, roll...

You've brought the thread to an interesting point and you're discarding it.

Which Rights?


Simple google search pulled up this.

gizmodo.com...

Still makes me sick that this group can be allowed to exist. But, it's their belief and who am I to deny their beliefs.


So the Right to Assemble.
Protected in The First in the US's case and other writs across the board...

As sick as it is, yes they should be allowed to "parade", as gross as I find it, and as much as I wish someone would slip their fingers on the Reaper Drone button...

There is a reason people like me are not in charge of Human Rights Laws, thank God for the softies because there'd be a trail of carnage if some of us were left to our devices.


What other Rights were you thinking about?

I know what you want me to say, and I will refuse to stoop to that level. As a father of a little girl, I will not go there. It's already against all laws of humanity and should not be allowed.



I'm not trying to get you to say anything I was genuinely interested in which Rights you were thinking about.


Rights, in my and many other's opinions, is something inherently lawful by Nature and does not harm or impede others...

What you're dancing around (from what I can tell by your latest reply) is a Paedophile's idea that they have a "Right" to sleep with children...
Well no that's not and never will be (in a sane world) a Right.


So your example is not befitting the scenario of a Trans* using the bathroom of the gender they identify with in which no one is harmed unless someone does some serious damage with a Number 2.
But a plumber will suffice.



posted on May, 24 2016 @ 03:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stormdancer777

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TinfoilTP

How about proving this is an issue/problem before continuing this line of reasoning? Because everything points to you originally trying to be facetious and now it looks like you are trying to put together a serious point here since I didn't laugh at your bad joke.


So it is more clear now.
Only favored perversions get preferential treatment or the politically expedient. Adult diaper wearing is not a divisive enough issue to get a PC makeover. Got it.


Are we talking about, people who need them or adults that like wearing them as a fetish?


If their treatment in public is the same, what difference does your question make? They are an adult with a diaper on, and according to PC police they are entitled to scream hate crime if they cannot carry out their duties as adult diaper wearers.




top topics



 
25
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join