It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There are still people that buy the Su-25 narrative?
He probably would have tried had it not been for NATO making sure that wouldn't happen.
And exactly who is my "crew" you speak of, because last time I checked I wasn't part of a crew.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Ohanka
Wow! There are still people that buy the Su-25 narrative? If that were true, explain how the Su-25 was capable of operating well outside its capabilities. Explain how it made it into separatist controlled area with no one shooting it and firing upon it. Explain why Russia has to produce that ridiculous hoax showing a jet firing on the airliner.
Really, what did they do in the past year to impress the new "Hitler"?
When was the last time you checked?
No, S-125 SAM missile, operated by the Ukrainian Air Force's Air Defence Branch in a report produced by the German Opposition in 2015.
Khodakovsky said it was widely known that rebels had obtained BUKs from Ukrainian forces in the past, including three captured at a checkpoint in April and another captured near the airport in Donetsk.He said none of the BUKs captured from Ukrainian forces were operational.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Antipathy17
Ahh good old American Hypocrisy.
I must have missed the part in the article where they are being sued in the United States. You did catch that this is an Australian suit, right?
Oh but wait according to certain people that see him the way you do he isn't the new Hitler...so can we at least decide on whether he is/or isn't the new Hitler as that is getting confusing.
That's what I thought.
So I guess the answer to my question is......nothing.
You thought, yet you came up with nothing.
There are 33 next-of-kin named in the application, the Sydney Morning Herald reported - eight from Australia, one from New Zealand with the rest from Malaysia.
Why would they need to impress him?
Now care to answer the question asked to you, or are you just going to deflect away from it?
To make him not conquer Europe? Didn't you just say that he didn't do it because of NATO?
This is rich. I'm pretty sure I was the one that asked you a question, and you deflected away from it. Do I need to qoute the specific posts?
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
I think Palestinians should sue the U.S. and U.K. governments
MH17 was downed in separatist territory. The separatists had been downing aircraft for weeks leading up to the tragedy. The separatists do not have aircraft and thus the Ukrainian forces would have no reason to fire at an aircraft.