It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why Hillary Clinton is sinking faster than the Titanic

page: 3
48
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   
There are real facts and Fox “facts”


The latter belong to the untruthful and biased




posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:27 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

I read an article earlier this morning in which a reporter asked Sid Blumenthal about the whole email thing and he got smarmy with the reporter.

Hillary's insistence on "no willful violations" and "retroactively classification," Mills getting up and leaving during an FBI interview, Bill calling the investigation a "game" all point to an attitude of 'we know we did wrong AND got caught but we're going to get away with it and there's nothing anyone can do about it.'

I would dearly love to see a "shock and awe" level of findings and an avalanche of multi-count indictment recommendations, but I would not be surprised to see the Clintons skate after tossing a few of their underlings under the bus as appeasement.

And her sycophants won't care regardless of what the FBI finds, Hillary can do no wrong in the eyes of some.



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   
Apologies, phone problems
edit on 21-5-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: (no reason given)


 


May as well use this post...


a reply to: MysticPearl

That was due more to your source than the story.

Anything traceable to Sorcha Faal is dead on arrival.

While there may be some truth within a Sorcha story, there will be much that is not and further distortion, addition, or omission which lead one further away from what might be worth considering.

Any time you find a story by Faal, check for other, non-related, sources and then use them as the basis for your OP. A mention of a Faal story if your so inclined but I would steer clear entirely if it were me.
edit on 21-5-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   
See above
edit on 21-5-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Those damn smart phones! Always outsmarting us...



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

If it makes you feel any better, I was the biggest Hillary syncophant ever, in 2008.

Not exaggerating.

If I could open my eyes to Hillary, I think most people can, too.


edit on 21-5-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Well it definitely makes ME feel better.


But to be honest I still think she would have been better in 2008 than Obama. But I sure as hell don't want to see her as POTUS now.



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

That does give me some hope.

Oh, my comments don't precluse your idea that Hillary is a placeholder and knows it.

The email thing could be enough to keep her from being president while being a Clinton might be enough to keep her out of jail.

Ideally, the FBI turns up enough dirt in the Clinton Foundation corruption investigation to even overshadow the Clintonian ability to skate by when others would be put under the jail.



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
But to be honest I still think she would have been better in 2008 than Obama.


Honestly, I didn't and still don't think they would have been substantively different.

That's why I was so pissed off at the party, in 2008. My feminist-nose was out of joint. I felt like Obama was championed by the party simply because racism was easier to exploit for votes than sexism & misogyny. I also thought Hillary had the edge on qualifications.

Those reasons led me to feel..and then understand...the entire party is disingenuous about what their 'tolerance & enlightenment' is really all about: political exploitation.

I've allowed myself to be much more objective in my analysis of the two parties since that epiphany.


edit on 21-5-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: MotherMayEye

That does give me some hope.

Oh, my comments don't precluse your idea that Hillary is a placeholder and knows it.

The email thing could be enough to keep her from being president while being a Clinton might be enough to keep her out of jail.

Ideally, the FBI turns up enough dirt in the Clinton Foundation corruption investigation to even overshadow the Clintonian ability to skate by when others would be put under the jail.


Even though I believe 'The Establishment' would be 'getting their way' with Bernie, I would find MUCH solace and happiness if Hillary was not the nominee or GE winner.

Keep in mind that I am still firmly in the apathy camp on the outcome of this election though.



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

FOX did ask Obama that very question a few weeks back. Here's the interview.

video.foxnews.com...=show-clips



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Kind of self fulfilling. If she gets indicted we're right.
If she gets off we told you they would cover for her so we're still right.



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 04:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft




bring down the Hilldenberg - she''s a battle hardened war-pig


Man i laughed so hard it started to hurt



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MotherMayEye

FOX did ask Obama that very question a few weeks back. Here's the interview.

video.foxnews.com...=show-clips


Oh, God, please don't make me watch an MSM news clip. Just tell me how he answered and I'll take your word for it!



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 06:34 PM
link   
If the FBI finds enough evidence to indict her.

I believe they will charge her.

If not, we are not all equal in the eyes of the law.

If we are not all equal...We don't have anything.



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 06:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: DAVID64
As bad as I hate to say it [ and I've said it many times ] Clinton will never have charges brought against her and will never see the inside of a courtroom, much less a jail.
She is too connected, has dirt on too many people and will use that to get out of anything they can throw at her. But, that dirt works against her also. If "They" ever decide that Hillary is getting to be too much of a problem, it will be a more permanent solution they use, not jail.

From your mouth to God's ear!



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
There are real facts and Fox “facts”


The latter belong to the untruthful and biased


Funny how people like you choose the single conservative voice in a sea of liberal lies and worry...and spend so much of your lives trying to demean them. It only goes to show how well Fox is doing when being such a small percentage of the news market, you still put them on a pedestal and elevate them above all the liars, call attention to their words and let the whole world of people that disagree with you, realize that Fox must therefore be a good resource for facts.

Thank you. Truly!!! Thank you so much!



posted on May, 21 2016 @ 07:02 PM
link   
Crooked Hillary Rotten Clinton is a power hungry maniac, I honestly believe that she is mentally ill.

The lying barking mad woman belongs inside a mental asylum, and nowhere near the Oval Office. ~$heopleNation



posted on May, 22 2016 @ 01:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: SheopleNation
Crooked Hillary Rotten Clinton is a power hungry maniac, I honestly believe that she is mentally ill.

The lying barking mad woman belongs inside a mental asylum, and nowhere near the Oval Office. ~$heopleNation


I agree, something seems off. Like wicked witch of the east off, how anybody can watch her talk for than a minute or two and not get creeped out is beyond me.



posted on May, 22 2016 @ 02:24 AM
link   
Clinton and her top aides had access to a Pentagon-run classified network that goes up to the Secret level, as well as a separate system used for Top Secret communications.

The two systems - the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) and the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS) - are not connected to the unclassified system, known as the Non-Classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNet). You cannot email from one system to the other, though you can use NIPRNet to send emails outside the government.

Somehow, highly classified information from SIPRNet, as well as even the super-secure JWICS, jumped from those closed systems to the open system and turned up in at least 1,340 of Clinton's home emails - including several the CIA earlier this month flagged as containing ultra-secret Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access Programs, a subset of SCI.

There is no way that information from these isolated systems can be emailed to a private outside email server. This information had to be put on a flash drive and walked outside the secure area.


Buck



new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join