It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Why I think Hillary will could bring disclosure.

page: 1
<<   2 >>

log in


posted on May, 20 2016 @ 08:48 AM
First, off. Let me say I think she is a terribly dishonest person and would not be fit for presidency, you can lay down the pitch-forks now.

That said, here are the reasons why it might really be probable she would actually become the disclosure President.
Yes, she does this to pander UFO believers for votes as well but here are some reasons as to why she might actually want to see it happen.

1. She has hired John Podesta, who has openly spoken and advocated UFO disclosure 3 times in public before she hired him.
AND she has given him the green light to talk about UFOs and imply aliens, as he has done that twice the past year:

2. She is talking about it her self. To the Conway sun she reported that 'I think we may already have been visited, I don't know' on December 2015 and said similar things on Jimmy Kimmel and that radio news show last week

3. She is getting OLD and she has been in the now for almost 20 years now (see the rockefeller initiative, declassified documents that show she and Bill had many meetings about this with Laurence Rockefeller and discussed the phenomena).
Just like any other human being, to see disclosure happen in your life time is extremely fascinating and exciting, not something people generally would want to miss.

Despite her dishonesty and being a true typical politician, this actually an exciting thing about her potential presidency.

In before people still accusing me of Shilling. No I do not think you should vote for her, I think the USA needs a political and economic revolution and big time change.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 08:52 AM
'Cause she's one of them?

She's just playing the crowd. They will all do and say anything to get a vote.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 08:54 AM
A terribly corrupt and dishonest person will tell us the truth about UFO's. Do you even hear yourself?

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 08:57 AM
a reply to: Benicealways

The same was said when he was Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton , no disclosure happened.

Nor when he was a senior adviser to Obama.

As John Podesta — a senior advisor to President Barack Obama — stepped down from his post on Friday, he tweeted that his biggest regret about leaving the administration was some unfinished UFO business.

edit on 20-5-2016 by gortex because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 08:58 AM
a reply to: jjkenobi

Why not, even if you were a power and money hungry person this would still exhilarating to witness.
Not to mention, being the first to disclose would be a terrific ego boost, as well, either way the implications are here.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:10 AM
If the government knows about UFO's I don't think they tell a new president every 4 years....

That said I think they know..

The Seth guy who runs SETI, said his most commonly asked question is:

"If you do find proof of intelligent extraterrestrial life, who are you supposed to call first?"

His answer?

"No one..."

Well, no politician/president is going to turn down the oppertunity to be the person who gives the wildly historic "first contact speech."

So that means only a couple things...

1) Seth is lying and does have a number he is supposed to call..

2) the government knows SETI is looking in the wrong place, so it will never make contact.

The government can't KNOW SETI won't find anything, unless the government knows what's out's like proving a negative..


posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:14 AM
a reply to: Benicealways

There will NEVER be any disclosure.Ever. No one person will be believed by the world. Other countries have disclosed and it meant nothing.

It will never...ever...happen. So don't wait up....

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:17 AM
a reply to: Benicealways

If disclosure happens it won't come from The U.S. Why should it ?

I believe it will be an event the whole world will witness simultaneously.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:18 AM
a reply to: JoshuaCox

They don't have to tell her, she could just say:
'Given the available evidence it's safe to say we are being visited.'

Poof, taboo gone, thousands of millions will speak out and the world will know and the governments have no other option that to cooperate.

And no, other countries have declassified some files, none have actually officially disclosed. @mysteriousstranger

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:19 AM
a reply to: alldaylong

Well, disclosure per definition means a government structure coming forward.
But yes, it might be triggered by the next mass sighting.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:19 AM
Despite her dishonesty and being a true typical politician, this actually an exciting thing about her potential presidency.

"Once a liar, always a liar..." PERIOD.

I'll ONLY listen if the press conference is from "Cell Block C" from Leavenworth Federal Prison. If it ain't; I ain't..

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:21 AM
a reply to: mysterioustranger

There was disclosure , of sorts , back in 2011 but it was the answer people didn't want to hear so was dismissed.

Thank you for signing the petition asking the Obama Administration to acknowledge an extraterrestrial presence here on Earth.
The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race. In addition, there is no credible information to suggest that any evidence is being hidden from the public's eye.
However, that doesn't mean the subject of life outside our planet isn't being discussed or explored. In fact, there are a number of projects working toward the goal of understanding if life can or does exist off Earth. Here are a few examples:

If they were to say ET exists and are visiting what reason is there to believe that disclosure over the one above ?

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:25 AM
a reply to: gortex

It's not the answer people are 'looking for' because it's completely out of alignment with the evidence we have.

Only people who have not spend a second of research can belief such a statement.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:33 AM
a reply to: Benicealways

What evidence do we have ?
We have testimony , video and pictures and radar traces of things that may or may not of been there but as far as I'm aware there is no evidence linking any of those to an off world intelligence.

UFOs exist , but are they Alien ? ..... I don't think so.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 09:56 AM
Disclosure is a tricky business.

Disclosure of what? Backward engineering, ancient devices, secret discoveries.

Because I don't think they know much more than anyone else about UFOs and any entities that might be operating them. This is an ancient phenomenon, and people rarely witness an actual anomalous event. Often times the UFOs are ours now a days. What with secret aircraft, drones, and flares it's easy to mistake.

The only disclosure about ET that is going to come about - is if ET themselves show to the world they are here. Even then, there will still be people who deny it. They will say it's a hoax or mass hologram or what not.

I mean, after the Phoenix lights, Stephenville lights, the Kecksburg incident, Hudson Valley and so many other experiences shared - your either in the belief camp or your in the skeptics camp. But the polarization makes a consensus unobtainable.

I don't believe 'disclosure' will ever happen.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 10:23 AM
Yes she will.. She will disclose, "I am queen, and you all are F*ed!"


posted on May, 20 2016 @ 10:49 AM

edit on 20-5-2016 by AVtech34 because: (no reason given)

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 10:51 AM
I don't see that Hillary will have any more luck than any other president has had--and they were also interested. Carter was fascinated with UFOs. So was Nixon. Ford tried to get congressional hearings started on them. Bill Clinton wanted to know about UFOs and who killed JFK. Heretofore there has not been any lack of interest in Presidents about UFOs.

Yet none of them so far has been remotely successful in promoting "Disclosure." Why would Hillary be any different? Presidents, in particular, are temporary help. They don't actually run the place. Career civil servants and military do. Presidents come and go and those guys hang on for 40-50 years each. Those pinning their hopes of Disclosure on Hillary are going to be disappointed.

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 10:54 AM
a reply to: gortex

Mass sightings that include the greys, tens of thousands of contact reports, analyzed implants and a Harvard professor researching the abduction phenomena before it got any media attention who believed them.

And what else should flying disks and some absolutely baffling UFOs be (I know there are other probabilities, but given all the evidence, it just points to one thing).

posted on May, 20 2016 @ 11:01 AM
a reply to: gortex

You got that right Gort! There will never be a worldwide one. There has been one cared. No one announcement will ever come...again

top topics

<<   2 >>

log in