Muslim States Ban LGBT Groups From UN Meeting

A group of 51 states, collectively known as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, has denied 11 LGBTI organizations access to a high-level meeting at the United Nations. The meeting, which was scheduled for next month, would be discussing the prospects of ending AIDS. The action of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has sparked protests from United States, Canada and the European Union among other nations.
Muslim States Ban LGBT Groups From UN Meeting

This is something that could wake liberals up to how backward and evil Muslim states are.

'Selling' Children Is a Radical Form of Religion

Liberals seemingly don't care about the children whose lives are ruined because they're legally 'sold.' But, mess with LGBT groups and that could be a major wake-up call.

Or it could be something else to rationalize away and forget about like it never happened.

Great op lol, yes we lberals defend muslims from behing picked on because we are for the selling of kids, makes so much sense.

I've always found one of the biggest contradictions in the leftist and liberal support of Mooslims to be that the Mooslims are one of, if not the most hateful, bigoted, divisive, groups out there.

For how much times the leftists and progressives spend attacking the right for "offending" with words, there's nary a mention of the extreme hate coming out of the Mooslim world.

And no, that doesn't mean all Mooslims share in that hate but simply look at individual rights and freedoms and the lack lack there of across Mooslims nations, then tell me how any leftist worth their salt continues to ignore it.

I could do a quick google search and find thousands upon thousands of leftist articles/blogs claiming Trump and the right are the extremely hateful, yet will find almost nothing from those same writers on the Mooslims and their atrocious track record of human rights.

Will they at least be able to use the bathroom while they're there?

That's my biggest concern.

dp

Such bigots. How disgusting. The SJW's should be all over this,thank goodness-it is likely to make headline news for weeks,if not months. So relieved about that

en.m.wikipedia.org...

Member states.

Erdogan is President of this group.

So no surprise in their stance.

a reply to: Profusion

And yet many "Conservatives" in the US would applaud this decision, not publicly of-course.


a reply to: NthOther

originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: gladtobehere

So you don't go after the real bigots in this case, you go after US conservatives. Because that makes sense.

Well no, I think the OP is making the point that the "misguided" Liberals oppose bigotry against Moslems in contrast to the Trump "Conservatives".

Which by the way, just because you oppose the hatred (and generalizations) of an entire group doesnt mean you agree with everything they do.

I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy of Trump supporters simply because many Conservatives would probably be on the same page as this particular coalition in the UN, which also includes Russia and China.

Based on Conservative opposition to gay marriage and this belief of theirs that homosexuality and transgenderism is being pushed or promoted in our culture/society.

This can't possibly be real...Muslims are not Bigots; Islam is a religion of peace and love.
I'm sure this story is just disinformation.

Back me up Liberals.

So the Muslims are against gays and trans?? Shocked
This will surely make headlines...
Its what their bible preaches. They follow it verbatim.
Christians dont. This isn't surptising.

I'm not even going to address this. The post deteriorated into liberal and "SJW" bashing before the end of the first post and set the circle-jerk tone of this discussion.

a reply to: gladtobehere

So you don't go after the real bigots in this case, you go after US conservatives.

Because that makes sense.

What if powerful Muslim groups want this for the U.S. ?

a reply to: Profusion

People are always going to hate other people.

It's why we still have wars.

This idea of peaceful "coexist" memes and happy flower unicorn sunshine is as realistic as Caitlin Jenner's boobs.

originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: gladtobehere

So you don't go after the real bigots in this case, you go after US conservatives.

Because that makes sense.

Are you denying that many conservatives would support this decision or are you unhappy with the thread evolving?

OOOOOOoooooo the gloves come off!

The protected class vs the protected class OHHHHhhhhhh LETS GET READY TO RUMMMMMMMBBBLLLEEEE!!!!!

a reply to: Hazardous1408

It's called "derailing". And shamelessly, at that.

When Hillary Clinton finds out about this...I'll bet she'll give back that $100 Million...Ooooo...she's gonna be so MAD!

a reply to: NthOther

I don't believe in derailment of a thread.

Threads evolve all day.

Just about every anti Trump thread becomes a Hillary bash fest.

That's derailment. This is more additional info that makes a good point.
Re evangelicals et al.

& you didn't say that in your initial reply, contrary to that you seemed more than happy to continue that line of discussion.

Forgive me.



Edit: IAMTAT right on time to bring up Hillary.

You see my point Nth?

Where are the SJW's on this?