It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Atomic clock is not a standard is accuracy.
Since we are discussing facts in LaBTop presentation, can you give us your evidence that proves LaBTop presentation is not correct?
Remember your "opinions" are not facts unless you can back them up.
Revisionists say sharp spikes (graph 1, above) mean bombs toppled the WTC. Scientists disprove the claim with the more detailed graph 2 (below). (Seismograph readings by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University: Won-Young Kim, senior research scientist; Arthur Lerner-Lam, associate director; Mary Tobin, senior science writer)
"There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," Lerner-Lam tells PM. "That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context."
Revisionists say sharp spikes (graph 1, above) mean bombs toppled the WTC. Scientists disprove the claim with the more detailed graph 2 (below). (Seismograph readings by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University: Won-Young Kim, senior research scientist; Arthur Lerner-Lam, associate director; Mary Tobin, senior science writer)
"There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," Lerner-Lam tells PM. "That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context."
Just because some guy on the internet posts page after page doesn't mean he's correct.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: LaBTop
Ask a simple question and you give me paragraphs? Just asked how network news in 2001 professionally had their times set on their field cameras to ensure they had the correct time. There is a process in science and industry to ensure equipment that measures is calibrated accurately and periodically. The calibration is usually set by a calibration lab. The lab documents how accurate the device is working. Simple statement. Prove that network news follows a standard to ensure time accuracy and how they conform / document to that standard. Then you need to prove the seismographs adhere to the same standard or a greater standard.
Something like this for starters. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
You act like you know nothing about lab procedures. What you are implying without proof is the video time stamps are of scientific lab quality with no proof what standard the news networks hold themselves to.
Ask NIST a simple question and NIST gives me paragraphs? Just asked how Network News in 2001 professionally had their times set on their field cameras to ensure they had the correct time. There is a process in science and industry to ensure equipment that measures is calibrated accurately and periodically. The calibration is usually set by a calibration lab. The lab documents how accurate the device is working. Simple statement. Let NIST prove that Network News follows a standard to ensure time accuracy and how they conform / document to that standard. Then NIST needs to prove the seismographs adhere to the same standard or a greater standard.
Something like this for starters. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
NIST acts like NIST knows nothing about lab procedures. What NIST is implying without proof is the video time stamps are of scientific lab quality with no proof what standard the news networks hold themselves to.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: neutronflux
Atomic clock is not a standard is accuracy.
Wrong, they are now.
Atomic Clocks to Become Even More Accurate
www.livescience.com...
Just because some guy on the internet posts page after page doesn't mean he's correct.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: neutronflux
Just asked how network news in 2001 professionally had their times set on their field cameras to ensure they had the correct time. There is a process in science and industry to ensure equipment that measures is calibrated accurately and periodically.
If it is so easy why don't you pick up the phone and call the networks?
I am sure they would be happy to help you.
The timing process was initially difficult. However, Task staff timing skills improved with practice while more visual material became available, and the number of timed assets increased. Ultimately, 3,357 of the 7,118 catalogued photographs and 2,789 of the 6,982 video clips in the database were timed with assigned relative uncertainties of 3 s or better.
With about one second? Even if that is documented. So some of your stated times are two second intervals. 1 second is half of your two seconds. that indicates you figuring can be between one to three seconds off. So by your own implications your times can be oshort one second or long one second.
Just because a Popular Mechanics editor wrote a shoddy piece of yellow journalism which has been thoroughly crashed into the ground by several better informed writers,
October 25, 2013, Michael Newman, NIST Public Affairs Office, to William Pepper, attorney for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. NIST is admitting criminal negligence here. They're also lying, because in this case the web stiffeners at the end of crucial girder A2001 were mainly there to prevent lateral walk off failure. If NIST had included them in the model, they couldn't have caused the initial collapse initiation failure. And this is just one problem with the NIST investigation no media outlet is willing to touch.