It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: MrBig2430
Well, we will have to wait until A&E working with another group who will have a Peer Review Report done on the WTC 7.
I believe that Report will be available around April of 2017.
You seem to just make up false facts and ignore the science and hard work others are doing.
Use flat earth for an example. If 999 scientists each on their own through research concluded the earth is a sphere backed by satellite imagery with no evidence of flat earth, why would they waste their time with a person concluding the earth is flat? You can find "proof" of flat earth on youtube. 911 conspiracists use much of the same false logic, pseudoscience, and claims of everyone being against them.
CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT TURNED OUT TO BE TRUE
This is a list OR INDEX of conspiracies considered proven to have existed or officially covered-up (and or later discovered) with or without newer evidence.
Are you a conspiracy theorist? If not, perhaps you should be. Yes, there have certainly been a lot of “conspiracy theories” over the years that have turned out not to be accurate. However, the truth is that a large number of very prominent conspiracy theories have turned out to actually be true. So the next time that you run into some “tin foil hat wearing lunatics”, you might want to actually listen to what they have to say. They may actually know some things that you do not. In fact, one recent study found that “conspiracy theorists” are actually more sane than the general population. So the next time you are tempted to dismiss someone as a “conspiracy theorist”, just remember that the one that is crazy might actually be you. The following are 16 popular conspiracy theories that turned out to be true…
911 conspiracists use much of the same false logic, pseudoscience, and claims of everyone being against them.
So, debunk the MIT, Purdue, and the other backers of fire collapse. Repeated research only increases the legitimate claim of fire collapse. Research has discredited jones and the like. Scientific proof, not opinion.
Name the cause of the WTC collapses backed by a majority of 911 conspiracists. Bombs, thermite, nukes, missiles, lasers, energy waves. Ironic those of "truth" cannot agree on a truth.
It seems more logical, that NIST can't bring themselves to admit that their real time methods are bogus.
Or they know, their whole real-time reasoning/calculations fall apart, when the second plane impact time was also 9 seconds earlier, and what we see in the LDEO plane impact seismogram are then explosions, and not a plane impact.