It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wall Street Journal‎: What If Clinton Gets Indicted?

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:01 AM
link   

If there are indictments, Team Clinton will dismiss them as an overreaction to unintentional, minor mistakes and try pushing on through. But that may be unacceptable to the party’s hierarchy, especially if indictments occur before the Democratic convention in Philadelphia opens July 25.

The party establishment might balk at having the ticket led by someone mired in a national-security scandal or by Mr. Sanders, a socialist and independent who has never before sought election as a Democrat or attended a state or national convention.

Instead, the party establishment might move to replace Mrs. Clinton with Vice President Joe Biden, a sentimental favorite, or Secretary of State John Kerry, whom many in the party’s leadership think more substantive, less prone to gaffes and, because of his 2004 loss against President George W. Bush, more deserving.
What If Clinton Gets Indicted?


The Wall Street Journal‎ is the most liberal major media outlet out there according to an independent study:


In a 2004 study, Tim Groseclose and Jeff Milyo calculated the ideological bias of 20 media outlets by counting the frequency they cited particular think tanks and comparing that to the frequency that legislators cited the same think tanks. They found that the news reporting of The Journal was the most liberal (more liberal than NPR or The New York Times).
The Wall Street Journal


Some people posted recently that only conservative-leaning news outlets were discussing the possibility of a Hillary Clinton indictment. That is obviously not true.

If you want an entirely unbiased view of the Clinton investigation, look at this:

Will a federal criminal charge be filed against Hillary Clinton in 2016?

According to that market, the current probability of a Clinton indictment by the end of this year is 27%.

Apparently only liberal-leaning sources mean anything to liberals. We've finally got it. Will they ignore it?


edit on 19-5-2016 by Profusion because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:11 AM
link   
She needs to, she is devil like. Horrible human being. How could the dems not know in the beginning they were sending crap options to the table.
edit on 19-5-2016 by crusadors because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

A cute sort of share buying social media site. Are you kidding me?

You didn't need that to show she may be indicted.

I posted on ATS about 2 months ago that Joe Biden's PR team, tthat is located not far from my home, was geared up to pull together an election team at any moment.

You mean to say that you think that Liberals only read Liberal-leaning sources.

You are incorrect.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: crusadors
She needs to, she is devil like. Horrible human being. How could the dems not know in the beginning they were sending crap options to the table.


Crap options? how many did the Republicans have? 16?

Now that is a lotta crap.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

I was sort of thinking, by your title, you would have some ideas as to what would happen if Clinton gets indicted.
That is not what was provided. I am let down.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: crusadors
She needs to, she is devil like. Horrible human being. How could the dems not know in the beginning they were sending crap options to the table.


Crap options? how many did the Republicans have? 16?

Now that is a lotta crap.


16 is better than 3....Who were you hoping for, Jesus??? C'mon man, the Republicans had some very good people try.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: crusadors

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: crusadors
She needs to, she is devil like. Horrible human being. How could the dems not know in the beginning they were sending crap options to the table.


Crap options? how many did the Republicans have? 16?

Now that is a lotta crap.


16 is better than 3....Who were you hoping for, Jesus??? C'mon man, the Republicans had some very good people try.


As in who??



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:30 AM
link   
Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush..........All good people....The others not mentioned are not nearly as bad as Hillary.

They DO care about the Union. They do want what is right. They give a damn. Hillary does not care about you or I.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: crusadors
Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush..........All good people....The others not mentioned are not nearly as bad as Hillary.

They DO care about the Union. They do want what is right. They give a damn. Hillary does not care about you or I.


Out of all those, I only found Lindsey Graham to be reasonable. None of them care about us either. I found Lindsey Graham reasonable when he sopke, no idea if he cares , though.
edit on 19-5-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-5-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)
Rand Paul was not too bad in the beginning, but his ideals diverged from his Father's a lot and too much from mine.
edit on 19-5-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)


The rest I find creepy and backwards, especiallly Carson.
edit on 19-5-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 01:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: crusadors
Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush..........All good people....The others not mentioned are not nearly as bad as Hillary.

They DO care about the Union. They do want what is right. They give a damn. Hillary does not care about you or I.


Out of all those, I only found Lindsey Graham to be reasonable. None of them care about us either. I found Lindsey Graham reasonable when he sopke, no idea if he cares , though. Rand Paul was not too bad in the beginning, but his ideals diverged from his Father's a lot and too much from mine.

The rest I find creepy and backwards, especiallly Carson.


I saw the passion....They cared. But I digress. The only analogy I can equate politics to is my own passion for college football. I am from Ohio, and a big Buckeye fan. So obviously we have a rival in Michigan. Politics is just like sports. You can have the worst team in the world, but you will never waiver from "your" team, no matter how bad they are. The liberals are going to back Hillary knowing she's awful just because she is on "their" team. Its stupid. Totally asinine. It will never change though because people are brain washed.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 02:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: crusadors

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: crusadors
Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush..........All good people....The others not mentioned are not nearly as bad as Hillary.

They DO care about the Union. They do want what is right. They give a damn. Hillary does not care about you or I.


Out of all those, I only found Lindsey Graham to be reasonable. None of them care about us either. I found Lindsey Graham reasonable when he sopke, no idea if he cares , though. Rand Paul was not too bad in the beginning, but his ideals diverged from his Father's a lot and too much from mine.

The rest I find creepy and backwards, especiallly Carson.


I saw the passion....They cared. But I digress. The only analogy I can equate politics to is my own passion for college football. I am from Ohio, and a big Buckeye fan. So obviously we have a rival in Michigan. Politics is just like sports. You can have the worst team in the world, but you will never waiver from "your" team, no matter how bad they are. The liberals are going to back Hillary knowing she's awful just because she is on "their" team. Its stupid. Totally asinine. It will never change though because people are brain washed.
Piss poor analogy. This is not a silly, meaningless football game, that doesn't mean a damn thing. This is politics that affect the lives of all Americans across the board. Stupid ass sport rivalries are just that, stupid and in the grand scheme of things, meaningless. Americans know more about dumb ass sports statistics and celebrity news than they do about their own political climate. It's not "they" or "us". It's "we", the people, AMERICANS.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 02:57 AM
link   
a reply to: reldra



I posted on ATS about 2 months ago that Joe Biden's PR team, tthat is located not far from my home, was geared up to pull together an election team at any moment.

First , let me offer you my deepest heartfelt sympathies. Joe Biden , the " lovable idiot".




posted on May, 19 2016 @ 03:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

I love it!

Lol!! An indictment is an "over reaction" Hahahahaha!!!

WTF are they smoking!!!??

Biden? I guess the bench is empty, no one in the dugout for the Dems. Sheesh.

Oh yeah, Bernie and the brownshirts.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 04:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: reldra



I posted on ATS about 2 months ago that Joe Biden's PR team, tthat is located not far from my home, was geared up to pull together an election team at any moment.

First , let me offer you my deepest heartfelt sympathies. Joe Biden , the " lovable idiot".

They are ALL idiots. Some, not lovable so much.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 09:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Profusion

I was sort of thinking, by your title, you would have some ideas as to what would happen if Clinton gets indicted.
That is not what was provided. I am let down.


From the article...


If there are indictments, Team Clinton will dismiss them as an overreaction to unintentional, minor mistakes and try pushing on through.



posted on May, 19 2016 @ 11:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: JimiBlack

originally posted by: crusadors

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: crusadors
Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush..........All good people....The others not mentioned are not nearly as bad as Hillary.

They DO care about the Union. They do want what is right. They give a damn. Hillary does not care about you or I.


Out of all those, I only found Lindsey Graham to be reasonable. None of them care about us either. I found Lindsey Graham reasonable when he sopke, no idea if he cares , though. Rand Paul was not too bad in the beginning, but his ideals diverged from his Father's a lot and too much from mine.

The rest I find creepy and backwards, especiallly Carson.


I saw the passion....They cared. But I digress. The only analogy I can equate politics to is my own passion for college football. I am from Ohio, and a big Buckeye fan. So obviously we have a rival in Michigan. Politics is just like sports. You can have the worst team in the world, but you will never waiver from "your" team, no matter how bad they are. The liberals are going to back Hillary knowing she's awful just because she is on "their" team. Its stupid. Totally asinine. It will never change though because people are brain washed.
Piss poor analogy. This is not a silly, meaningless football game, that doesn't mean a damn thing. This is politics that affect the lives of all Americans across the board. Stupid ass sport rivalries are just that, stupid and in the grand scheme of things, meaningless. Americans know more about dumb ass sports statistics and celebrity news than they do about their own political climate. It's not "they" or "us". It's "we", the people, AMERICANS.


You are asleep, everything I said it truth. You flipped it around. Dems will vote for dems, reps will vote reps, and that is just how it works. It was an analogy dude......You missed the whole point.




top topics



 
5

log in

join