It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Onesmartdog
Be prepared to be called a liberal by conservatives and a conservative by liberals.
It feels good though.
The John Birch Society (JBS) is, in its own words, a conservative advocacy group supporting anti-communism and limited government.[2][3][4] It has been described as a radical right and far-right organization.[5][6][7][7][8] Businessman and founder Robert W. Welch, Jr. (1899–1985) developed an organizational infrastructure in 1958 of chapters nationwide. Its main activity in the 1960s, said Rick Perlstein, "comprised monthly meetings to watch a film by Welch, followed by writing postcards or letters to government officials linking specific policies to the Communist menace".[9] After an early rise in membership and influence, efforts by those such as conservative William F. Buckley, Jr. and National Review led the JBS to be identified as a fringe element of the conservative movement, mostly in fear of the radicalization of the American right.[10][11]
Founded in 1958, the John Birch Society (JBS) fiercely opposed the Civil Rights Movement during the 1960s and 1970s. Decades later, the rise of the Tea Party and the ongoing “Ron Paul Revolution” have helped the JBS make a comeback as it attracts young people by re-branding itself as “libertarian.” The organization is a significant force behind promoting the nullification of federal laws, as described in the most recent issue of The Public Eye. The JBS has also helped provide fodder for accusations that President Obama, considered by most Democrats to have governed as a centrist, is a Marxist.
originally posted by: FlyingWhale
a reply to: Onesmartdog
Honestly, for me, I wouldn't join any party. Seems to make people think they know your stance on a given political subject. I don't think anyone can fit exactly into one parties positions, so I won't join any of them. I do have to say I agree with most of what Libertarians say. Leave me alone and I'll leave you alone is pretty much how I look a this world.
originally posted by: FlyingWhale
a reply to: [post=20734282]Onesmartdog[/post
I don't think I'd go so far as living in the woods. Society is important to a point. Love the new party name.
Edit: I made it sound like I would eat bark. LOL!
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Onesmartdog
I agree with a lot of the JBS' positions, honestly. I find them to be reasonable, just, and eerily accurate.
originally posted by: CB328
I can't support the libertarian party because it seems to me that so many Libertarians have no clue of the reality of life in this country. Big business would destroy every person, plant and animal in existence if the government wasn't there to stop them, as well as scamming and bankrupting all of us.
And don't claim that "the market" would prevent it, there's an extremely long history of business doing every kind of immoral, inhuman and underhanded trick imaginable.
I can't support the libertarian party because it seems to me that so many Libertarians have no clue of the reality of life in this country.
Big business would destroy every person, plant and animal in existence if the government wasn't there to stop them Big business would destroy every person, plant and animal in existence if the government wasn't there to stop them, as well as scamming and bankrupting all of us.
if the government wasn't there to stop them Big business
The U.S. government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country's citizens, but is instead ruled by those of the rich and powerful, a new study from Princeton and Northwestern universities has concluded.