It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by infinite
Muslims who back the west will probably start to become targets of the extremists,
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
It seems about time for a major war or a major withdraw. I choose the latter.
Originally posted by Amuk
As I mentioned we aren't the only ones with problems with them and IMO the ones that suffer the most are the poor Muslims who are facing High unemployment, sexual repression, and being fed a constant barrage of its all the Jews/Americas fault to keep their anger pointed out ward instead of in.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Another reason is the Muslim tendency to resist integration into western society. They may live among us, work with us, but at the end of the day they don't socialize with us.
Originally posted by Amuk
It seems to me that the world is headed in one of two directions, a Muslim World War OR a Civil War among the Muslims between the extremists and the "sane" one
Any thoughts on the subject?
[edit on 14-1-2005 by Amuk]
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
I don't know why it is the recourse to oppresion is to get involved.
Originally posted by St Udio
I've heard the administration/regime....repeat and insist...
the "coalition of the willing" is at War:: against Terrorists!
not Islam or Muslims.
If/When the zealots are forced or directed to make Religion THE cause...
those moderate peaceful masses will join in the fatwa & jihad against western civilization.
Whats this 21st century theme?
The Amish and other communities co-exist & flourish within the USA,
these communities are also socially & governmental wise, considered
'backward' and 'archaic' by the modern american standards...
Are these people next in line for a 'modernization & enlightenment' ?
Originally posted by Amuk
We are not the only people fighting the Extremists, so are Russia and I only see it expanding further in the future. There are already problems in Europe, Asia, India, Africa all with Muslim Extremists.
[edit on 14-1-2005 by Amuk]
Originally posted by stokes
That statement suggests to me that the american policy on Iraq is not extremist in itself when in fact it is. Inciting war on another nation is extremist. Nice twist of current events. This is a perfect example of how people are manipulated into believing the righteousness of one particular side in a conflict. It is highly effective yet so subtle.
[edit on 15-1-2005 by stokes]
Originally posted by stokes
That statement suggests to me that the American policy on Iraq is not extremist in itself when in fact it is. Inciting war on another nation is extremist. Nice twist of current events. This is a perfect example of how people are manipulated into believing the righteousness of one particular side in a conflict. It is highly effective yet so subtle.
Originally posted by goregrinder
Originally posted by stokes
That statement suggests to me that the american policy on Iraq is not extremist in itself when in fact it is. Inciting war on another nation is extremist. Nice twist of current events. This is a perfect example of how people are manipulated into believing the righteousness of one particular side in a conflict. It is highly effective yet so subtle.
[edit on 15-1-2005 by stokes]
While you seek to pin the problems we have with muslim extremists on the Bush administration, it's without a doubt, an easily disproved argument.
Originally posted by stokes
contrary to Amuk's statement "We are not the only people fighting the Extremists, ..."
The flip side of this, is an American influenced World War or another American Civil War just as realistic?